Marília Pacífico Lucisano, Gilmer Torres Ramos, Daniel José Blanco‐Victorio, Laura Ricardina Ramírez‐Sotelo, Ricardo Barbosa Lima, Paulo Nelson‐Filho, Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva, Jessica Arieta Miranda, Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva
{"title":"利用纳米层析成像技术确定初级第二磨牙根管锥度:体外研究","authors":"Marília Pacífico Lucisano, Gilmer Torres Ramos, Daniel José Blanco‐Victorio, Laura Ricardina Ramírez‐Sotelo, Ricardo Barbosa Lima, Paulo Nelson‐Filho, Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva, Jessica Arieta Miranda, Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe conicity of the root canals of primary teeth is an important measure for endodontic therapies. However, determining this conicity depends on the methods employed, which requires further investigation.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the conicity of the root canals of the upper and lower primary second molars using nanotomography (nCT).DesignAn in vitro study was performed using nine primary second molars, both upper and lower, subjected to nCT. Comparisons between the diameters of root canals were performed between the thirds (cervical—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, middle—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and apical—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7). The conicity (%) was determined for each root canal from cervical to apical. Data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe conicity ranged from 2% to 8% for the upper primary second molars. Significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7 points) were observed in the mesio‐ and distobuccal roots (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05), but not in the palatal roots (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> > .05). For the lower primary second molars, the conicity ranged from 2% to 17%, as well as significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7 points) were observed in all roots (distal, mesiobuccal, and mesiolingual; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05).ConclusionThe conicity of the upper primary second molars was different from that of the lower ones, which showed a greater variability.","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Root canal conicity determination of primary second molars using nanotomography: An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Marília Pacífico Lucisano, Gilmer Torres Ramos, Daniel José Blanco‐Victorio, Laura Ricardina Ramírez‐Sotelo, Ricardo Barbosa Lima, Paulo Nelson‐Filho, Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva, Jessica Arieta Miranda, Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ipd.13198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe conicity of the root canals of primary teeth is an important measure for endodontic therapies. However, determining this conicity depends on the methods employed, which requires further investigation.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the conicity of the root canals of the upper and lower primary second molars using nanotomography (nCT).DesignAn in vitro study was performed using nine primary second molars, both upper and lower, subjected to nCT. Comparisons between the diameters of root canals were performed between the thirds (cervical—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, middle—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and apical—<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7). The conicity (%) was determined for each root canal from cervical to apical. Data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe conicity ranged from 2% to 8% for the upper primary second molars. Significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7 points) were observed in the mesio‐ and distobuccal roots (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05), but not in the palatal roots (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> > .05). For the lower primary second molars, the conicity ranged from 2% to 17%, as well as significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic>0, <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>5, and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic>7 points) were observed in all roots (distal, mesiobuccal, and mesiolingual; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .05).ConclusionThe conicity of the upper primary second molars was different from that of the lower ones, which showed a greater variability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13198\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Root canal conicity determination of primary second molars using nanotomography: An in vitro study
BackgroundThe conicity of the root canals of primary teeth is an important measure for endodontic therapies. However, determining this conicity depends on the methods employed, which requires further investigation.AimThe aim of this study was to determine the conicity of the root canals of the upper and lower primary second molars using nanotomography (nCT).DesignAn in vitro study was performed using nine primary second molars, both upper and lower, subjected to nCT. Comparisons between the diameters of root canals were performed between the thirds (cervical—D0, middle—D5, and apical—D7). The conicity (%) was determined for each root canal from cervical to apical. Data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe conicity ranged from 2% to 8% for the upper primary second molars. Significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (D0, D5, and D7 points) were observed in the mesio‐ and distobuccal roots (p < .05), but not in the palatal roots (p > .05). For the lower primary second molars, the conicity ranged from 2% to 17%, as well as significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (D0, D5, and D7 points) were observed in all roots (distal, mesiobuccal, and mesiolingual; p < .05).ConclusionThe conicity of the upper primary second molars was different from that of the lower ones, which showed a greater variability.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide.
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.