The heterogeneous wound microbiome varies with wound care pain, dressing type, and inflammatory gene expression

Wound dressing changes are essential procedures for wound management. However, ~50% of patients experience severe pain during these procedures despite the availability of analgesic medications, indicating a need for novel therapeutics that address underlying causes of pain. Along with other clinical factors, wound pathogens and inflammatory immune responses have previously been implicated in wound pain. To test whether these factors could contribute to severe pain during wound dressing changes, we conducted an exploratory, cross‐sectional analysis of patient‐reported pain, inflammatory immune responses, and wound microbiome composition in 445 wounds at the time of a study dressing change. We profiled the bacterial composition of 406 wounds using 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing and quantified gene expression of 13 inflammatory markers in wound fluid using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Neither inflammatory gene expression nor clinically observed inflammation were associated with severe pain, but Corynebacterium and Streptococcus were of lower relative abundance in wounds of patients reporting severe pain than those reporting little or no pain. Wound microbiome composition differed by wound location, and correlated with six of the inflammatory markers, including complement receptor C5AR1, pro‐inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)1β, chemokine IL‐8, matrix metalloproteinase MMP2, and the antimicrobial peptide encoding cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide. Interestingly, we found a relationship between the wound microbiome and vacuum‐assisted wound closure (VAC). These findings identify preliminary, associative relationships between wound microbiota and host factors which motivate future investigation into the directional relationships between wound care pain, wound closure technologies, and the wound microbiome.