{"title":"连续双侧全踝关节置换术：第一踝关节和第二踝关节的患者报告结果无差异","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Total ankle replacement is an established treatment for end-stage arthritis. However, there is little data examining outcomes in sequential bilateral replacements. This study aimed to compare outcomes between first and second ankles in sequential replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients were retrospectively contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire including the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EQ-5D-3 L, and a question assessing satisfaction. Electronic records identified demographics, procedural details, and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty patients underwent sequential bilateral ankle replacement over the study period. At a mean follow-up of four years, 18 patients completed the follow-up questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference between first and second ankles in terms of MOXFQ score, EQ-5D-3 L or satisfaction. Eleven complications were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We report excellent outcomes after sequential bilateral ankle replacement with no difference in outcomes between first and second ankles. These results can be used to counsel patients in the future and manage expectations.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 520-523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential bilateral total ankle replacements: No difference in patient-reported outcomes between the first and second ankle\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Total ankle replacement is an established treatment for end-stage arthritis. However, there is little data examining outcomes in sequential bilateral replacements. This study aimed to compare outcomes between first and second ankles in sequential replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients were retrospectively contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire including the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EQ-5D-3 L, and a question assessing satisfaction. Electronic records identified demographics, procedural details, and complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty patients underwent sequential bilateral ankle replacement over the study period. At a mean follow-up of four years, 18 patients completed the follow-up questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference between first and second ankles in terms of MOXFQ score, EQ-5D-3 L or satisfaction. Eleven complications were noted.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We report excellent outcomes after sequential bilateral ankle replacement with no difference in outcomes between first and second ankles. These results can be used to counsel patients in the future and manage expectations.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 520-523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773124000754\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773124000754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sequential bilateral total ankle replacements: No difference in patient-reported outcomes between the first and second ankle
Background
Total ankle replacement is an established treatment for end-stage arthritis. However, there is little data examining outcomes in sequential bilateral replacements. This study aimed to compare outcomes between first and second ankles in sequential replacement.
Methods
Patients were retrospectively contacted to complete a follow-up questionnaire including the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EQ-5D-3 L, and a question assessing satisfaction. Electronic records identified demographics, procedural details, and complications.
Results
Twenty patients underwent sequential bilateral ankle replacement over the study period. At a mean follow-up of four years, 18 patients completed the follow-up questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference between first and second ankles in terms of MOXFQ score, EQ-5D-3 L or satisfaction. Eleven complications were noted.
Conclusions
We report excellent outcomes after sequential bilateral ankle replacement with no difference in outcomes between first and second ankles. These results can be used to counsel patients in the future and manage expectations.
期刊介绍：
Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society.
The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
