莫滕-莱文的 "行动研究中的学术诚信 "再探：作为内在性的教育

IF 1 4区管理学 Q4 MANAGEMENT

Systemic Practice and Action Research Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s11213-024-09674-2

David Coghlan

{"title":"莫滕-莱文的 \"行动研究中的学术诚信 \"再探：作为内在性的教育","authors":"David Coghlan","doi":"10.1007/s11213-024-09674-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits Morten Levin’s article, “Academic integrity in action research” published in the journal, Action Research (Levin 2012). It develops the main theme of rigour and relevance from the perspective of interiority. Interiority is a philosophical theory and method that enables action researchers attend to the data of their consciousness, that is how they experience, question, understand, test their understanding, make judgments, make decisions and act, which Levin understands as bildung. I offer interiority as the perspective on how rigour and relevance may be understood and integrated in a reframing of the bildung of action researchers as Morten discussed it in 2012.","PeriodicalId":51694,"journal":{"name":"Systemic Practice and Action Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morten Levin’s “Academic Integrity in Action Research” Revisited: Bildung as Interiority\",\"authors\":\"David Coghlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11213-024-09674-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article revisits Morten Levin’s article, “Academic integrity in action research” published in the journal, Action Research (Levin 2012). It develops the main theme of rigour and relevance from the perspective of interiority. Interiority is a philosophical theory and method that enables action researchers attend to the data of their consciousness, that is how they experience, question, understand, test their understanding, make judgments, make decisions and act, which Levin understands as bildung. I offer interiority as the perspective on how rigour and relevance may be understood and integrated in a reframing of the bildung of action researchers as Morten discussed it in 2012.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systemic Practice and Action Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systemic Practice and Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-024-09674-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systemic Practice and Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-024-09674-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重温了莫滕-莱文发表在《行动研究》杂志上的文章《行动研究中的学术诚信》（莱文，2012 年）。文章从内在性的角度阐述了严谨性和相关性这一主题。内在性是一种哲学理论和方法，能让行动研究人员关注他们的意识数据，即他们如何体验、质疑、理解、检验自己的理解、做出判断、决策和行动，莱文将其理解为 "培养"（bildung）。正如莫滕在 2012 年所讨论的那样，我将 "内在性 "作为一个视角，探讨如何理解严谨性和相关性，并将其融入行动研究者的 "教养 "之中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Morten Levin’s “Academic Integrity in Action Research” Revisited: Bildung as Interiority

查看原文本刊更多论文

Morten Levin’s “Academic Integrity in Action Research” Revisited: Bildung as Interiority

This article revisits Morten Levin’s article, “Academic integrity in action research” published in the journal, Action Research (Levin 2012). It develops the main theme of rigour and relevance from the perspective of interiority. Interiority is a philosophical theory and method that enables action researchers attend to the data of their consciousness, that is how they experience, question, understand, test their understanding, make judgments, make decisions and act, which Levin understands as bildung. I offer interiority as the perspective on how rigour and relevance may be understood and integrated in a reframing of the bildung of action researchers as Morten discussed it in 2012.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Systemic Practice and Action Research MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Systemic Practice and Action Research is dedicated to advancing deeper understandings of issues that confront the contemporary world, and better means for engaging with these issues for the benefit of individuals, organizations, communities and their natural environments. To this end, a fundamental rethink of the purposes and methods of science is needed, making it more systemic and action-orientated. The journal therefore seeks to make a substantial contribution to rethinking science as well as to the reflective application of systemic practice and action research in all types of organizational and social settings. This international journal is committed to nurturing wide-ranging conversations around both qualitative and technical approaches for the betterment of people''s lives and ways of working together. It seeks to influence policy and strategy in its advocacy of action research as a primary means to gain vision and leverage in wicked problem areas. All forms of investigation and reasoning are considered potentially suitable for publication, including personal experience. There are no priorities attached to settings for studies and no greater significance given to one methodological style over another - as long as the work demonstrates a reflective and systemic quality. The journal welcomes manuscripts that are original, are well written, and contain a vivid argument. Papers normally will demonstrate knowledge of existing literature. Full papers are normally between 5,000 – 10,000 words (although longer papers will not be excluded if the argument justifies the word count) and short papers are about 2,000 words. Notes and letters are welcomed for publication in the ''notes from the field'' and ''letters'' sections. A rigorous mentoring-based refereeing system is applied in all cases. Officially cited as: Syst Pract Action Res