儿童将无生命的物体拟人化

Elizabeth J. Goldman, Diane Poulin‐Dubois
{"title":"儿童将无生命的物体拟人化","authors":"Elizabeth J. Goldman, Diane Poulin‐Dubois","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article examines the extant literature on animism and anthropomorphism in infants and young children. A substantial body of work indicates that both infants and young children have a broad concept of what constitutes a sentient agent and react to inanimate objects as they do to people in the same context. The literature has also revealed a developmental pattern in which anthropomorphism decreases with age, but social robots appear to be an exception to this pattern. Additionally, the review shows that children attribute psychological properties to social robots less so than people but still anthropomorphize them. Importantly, some research suggests that anthropomorphism of social robots is dependent upon their morphology and human‐like behaviors. The extent to which children anthropomorphize robots is dependent on their exposure to them and the presence of human‐like features. Based on the existing literature, we conclude that in infancy, a large range of inanimate objects (e.g., boxes, geometric figures) that display animate motion patterns trigger the same behaviors observed in child‐adult interactions, suggesting some implicit form of anthropomorphism. The review concludes that additional research is needed to understand what infants and children judge as social agents and how the perception of inanimate agents changes over the lifespan. As exposure to robots and virtual assistants increases, future research must focus on better understanding the full impact that regular interactions with such partners will have on children's anthropomorphizing.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Psychology &gt; Learning</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Cognitive Biology &gt; Cognitive Development</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Computer Science and Robotics &gt; Robotics</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501132,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Cognitive Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children's anthropomorphism of inanimate agents\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth J. Goldman, Diane Poulin‐Dubois\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcs.1676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review article examines the extant literature on animism and anthropomorphism in infants and young children. A substantial body of work indicates that both infants and young children have a broad concept of what constitutes a sentient agent and react to inanimate objects as they do to people in the same context. The literature has also revealed a developmental pattern in which anthropomorphism decreases with age, but social robots appear to be an exception to this pattern. Additionally, the review shows that children attribute psychological properties to social robots less so than people but still anthropomorphize them. Importantly, some research suggests that anthropomorphism of social robots is dependent upon their morphology and human‐like behaviors. The extent to which children anthropomorphize robots is dependent on their exposure to them and the presence of human‐like features. Based on the existing literature, we conclude that in infancy, a large range of inanimate objects (e.g., boxes, geometric figures) that display animate motion patterns trigger the same behaviors observed in child‐adult interactions, suggesting some implicit form of anthropomorphism. The review concludes that additional research is needed to understand what infants and children judge as social agents and how the perception of inanimate agents changes over the lifespan. As exposure to robots and virtual assistants increases, future research must focus on better understanding the full impact that regular interactions with such partners will have on children's anthropomorphizing.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\\\"simple\\\"> <jats:list-item>Psychology &gt; Learning</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Cognitive Biology &gt; Cognitive Development</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Computer Science and Robotics &gt; Robotics</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论文章探讨了有关婴幼儿万物有灵论和拟人化的现有文献。大量研究表明,婴幼儿对什么是有生命的物体有着广泛的概念,他们对无生命物体的反应与在相同环境下对人的反应一样。文献还揭示了一种发展模式,即拟人化程度会随着年龄的增长而降低,但社交机器人似乎是这一模式的例外。此外,综述还显示,儿童对社交机器人的心理属性的归属程度低于人,但仍会将其拟人化。重要的是,一些研究表明,社交机器人的拟人化取决于其形态和类似人类的行为。儿童拟人化机器人的程度取决于他们对机器人的接触程度和机器人是否具有类似人类的特征。根据现有文献,我们得出结论:在婴儿期,大量无生命物体(如盒子、几何图形)显示出的有生命的运动模式会引发在儿童与成人互动中观察到的相同行为,这表明存在某种隐含的拟人化形式。综述得出结论,需要开展更多研究,以了解婴幼儿和儿童对社会代理的判断,以及对无生命代理的感知如何随着生命周期的变化而变化。随着接触机器人和虚拟助手的机会增多,未来的研究必须侧重于更好地了解与这些伙伴的定期互动对儿童拟人化的全面影响:心理学 > 学习 认知生物学 > 认知发展 计算机科学与机器人 > 机器人学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children's anthropomorphism of inanimate agents
This review article examines the extant literature on animism and anthropomorphism in infants and young children. A substantial body of work indicates that both infants and young children have a broad concept of what constitutes a sentient agent and react to inanimate objects as they do to people in the same context. The literature has also revealed a developmental pattern in which anthropomorphism decreases with age, but social robots appear to be an exception to this pattern. Additionally, the review shows that children attribute psychological properties to social robots less so than people but still anthropomorphize them. Importantly, some research suggests that anthropomorphism of social robots is dependent upon their morphology and human‐like behaviors. The extent to which children anthropomorphize robots is dependent on their exposure to them and the presence of human‐like features. Based on the existing literature, we conclude that in infancy, a large range of inanimate objects (e.g., boxes, geometric figures) that display animate motion patterns trigger the same behaviors observed in child‐adult interactions, suggesting some implicit form of anthropomorphism. The review concludes that additional research is needed to understand what infants and children judge as social agents and how the perception of inanimate agents changes over the lifespan. As exposure to robots and virtual assistants increases, future research must focus on better understanding the full impact that regular interactions with such partners will have on children's anthropomorphizing.This article is categorized under: Psychology > Learning Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development Computer Science and Robotics > Robotics
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信