绿色研发和环境政策方面的合作:税收还是标准

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin, Natacha Raffin
{"title":"绿色研发和环境政策方面的合作:税收还是标准","authors":"Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin, Natacha Raffin","doi":"10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we compare a tax and a standard as environmental tools depending on firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the government’s ability to credibly commit to its policy. We consider a duopoly model where production is polluting and in an effort to mitigate emissions, firms invest in green R &amp;D (in the presence of technological spillovers) either cooperatively or non-cooperatively. We explore two policy games in which the regulator establishes an emission tax or an emission standard either before or after firms engage in R &amp;D. We endogenize both the firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the regulator’s choice of policy instrument. We find that an emission standard is adopted only when firms choose not to cooperate. Conversely, a tax is desirable when firms collaborate in green R &amp;D. Moreover, we expand our framework by offering the opportunity for the regulator to authorize or ban cooperation in green R &amp;D before the firms make their strategic decisions.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooperation in green R &D and environmental policies: tax or standard\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin, Natacha Raffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this article, we compare a tax and a standard as environmental tools depending on firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the government’s ability to credibly commit to its policy. We consider a duopoly model where production is polluting and in an effort to mitigate emissions, firms invest in green R &amp;D (in the presence of technological spillovers) either cooperatively or non-cooperatively. We explore two policy games in which the regulator establishes an emission tax or an emission standard either before or after firms engage in R &amp;D. We endogenize both the firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the regulator’s choice of policy instrument. We find that an emission standard is adopted only when firms choose not to cooperate. Conversely, a tax is desirable when firms collaborate in green R &amp;D. Moreover, we expand our framework by offering the opportunity for the regulator to authorize or ban cooperation in green R &amp;D before the firms make their strategic decisions.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们比较了税收和标准作为环保工具的作用,这取决于企业的研发战略和政府对其政策做出可信承诺的能力。我们考虑了一个双头垄断模型,在该模型中,生产是污染性的,为了减少排放,企业会以合作或非合作的方式投资于绿色研发(在存在技术溢出效应的情况下)。我们探讨了两个政策博弈,在这两个博弈中,监管机构会在企业进行研究与开发之前或之后制定排放税或排放标准。我们将企业的研发战略和监管机构对政策工具的选择内生化。我们发现,只有当企业选择不合作时,才会采用排放标准。相反,当企业合作进行绿色研发时,税收则是可取的。此外,我们还扩展了我们的框架,为监管者提供了在企业做出战略决策之前授权或禁止绿色研发合作的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cooperation in green R &D and environmental policies: tax or standard

Cooperation in green R &D and environmental policies: tax or standard

In this article, we compare a tax and a standard as environmental tools depending on firms’ R &D strategy and the government’s ability to credibly commit to its policy. We consider a duopoly model where production is polluting and in an effort to mitigate emissions, firms invest in green R &D (in the presence of technological spillovers) either cooperatively or non-cooperatively. We explore two policy games in which the regulator establishes an emission tax or an emission standard either before or after firms engage in R &D. We endogenize both the firms’ R &D strategy and the regulator’s choice of policy instrument. We find that an emission standard is adopted only when firms choose not to cooperate. Conversely, a tax is desirable when firms collaborate in green R &D. Moreover, we expand our framework by offering the opportunity for the regulator to authorize or ban cooperation in green R &D before the firms make their strategic decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信