绿色研发和环境政策方面的合作:税收还是标准

IF 1.4 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin, Natacha Raffin
{"title":"绿色研发和环境政策方面的合作:税收还是标准","authors":"Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin, Natacha Raffin","doi":"10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we compare a tax and a standard as environmental tools depending on firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the government’s ability to credibly commit to its policy. We consider a duopoly model where production is polluting and in an effort to mitigate emissions, firms invest in green R &amp;D (in the presence of technological spillovers) either cooperatively or non-cooperatively. We explore two policy games in which the regulator establishes an emission tax or an emission standard either before or after firms engage in R &amp;D. We endogenize both the firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the regulator’s choice of policy instrument. We find that an emission standard is adopted only when firms choose not to cooperate. Conversely, a tax is desirable when firms collaborate in green R &amp;D. Moreover, we expand our framework by offering the opportunity for the regulator to authorize or ban cooperation in green R &amp;D before the firms make their strategic decisions.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":47149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regulatory Economics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooperation in green R &D and environmental policies: tax or standard\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin, Natacha Raffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this article, we compare a tax and a standard as environmental tools depending on firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the government’s ability to credibly commit to its policy. We consider a duopoly model where production is polluting and in an effort to mitigate emissions, firms invest in green R &amp;D (in the presence of technological spillovers) either cooperatively or non-cooperatively. We explore two policy games in which the regulator establishes an emission tax or an emission standard either before or after firms engage in R &amp;D. We endogenize both the firms’ R &amp;D strategy and the regulator’s choice of policy instrument. We find that an emission standard is adopted only when firms choose not to cooperate. Conversely, a tax is desirable when firms collaborate in green R &amp;D. Moreover, we expand our framework by offering the opportunity for the regulator to authorize or ban cooperation in green R &amp;D before the firms make their strategic decisions.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Regulatory Economics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Regulatory Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regulatory Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-024-09475-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们比较了税收和标准作为环保工具的作用,这取决于企业的研发战略和政府对其政策做出可信承诺的能力。我们考虑了一个双头垄断模型,在该模型中,生产是污染性的,为了减少排放,企业会以合作或非合作的方式投资于绿色研发(在存在技术溢出效应的情况下)。我们探讨了两个政策博弈,在这两个博弈中,监管机构会在企业进行研究与开发之前或之后制定排放税或排放标准。我们将企业的研发战略和监管机构对政策工具的选择内生化。我们发现,只有当企业选择不合作时,才会采用排放标准。相反,当企业合作进行绿色研发时,税收则是可取的。此外,我们还扩展了我们的框架,为监管者提供了在企业做出战略决策之前授权或禁止绿色研发合作的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cooperation in green R &D and environmental policies: tax or standard

Cooperation in green R &D and environmental policies: tax or standard

In this article, we compare a tax and a standard as environmental tools depending on firms’ R &D strategy and the government’s ability to credibly commit to its policy. We consider a duopoly model where production is polluting and in an effort to mitigate emissions, firms invest in green R &D (in the presence of technological spillovers) either cooperatively or non-cooperatively. We explore two policy games in which the regulator establishes an emission tax or an emission standard either before or after firms engage in R &D. We endogenize both the firms’ R &D strategy and the regulator’s choice of policy instrument. We find that an emission standard is adopted only when firms choose not to cooperate. Conversely, a tax is desirable when firms collaborate in green R &D. Moreover, we expand our framework by offering the opportunity for the regulator to authorize or ban cooperation in green R &D before the firms make their strategic decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Recent legislative and policy reforms have changed the nature of regulation. Partial deregulation has created a new dimension to regulatory problems, as the debate is extended to include diversification and new forms of regulation. The introduction of incentive-based rate schedules and ratemaking procedures, the integration of demand-side programs with planning for capitol expansion, and other developments, raise a host of theoretical and empirical questions. The Journal of Regulatory Economics serves as a high quality forum for the analysis of regulatory theories and institutions by developing the rigorous economics foundations of regulation. Both theoretical and applied works, including experimental research, are encouraged. Research in all aspects of regulation is of interest including traditional problems of natural monopoly, antitrust and competition policy, incentive regulation, deregulation, auction theory, new policy instruments, health and safety regulation, environmental regulation, insurance and financial regulation, hazardous and solid waste regulation, universal service obligation, and consumer product regulation. The JRE provides researchers, policy-makers, and institutions with current perspectives on the theory and practice of economics of regulation. While there are a number of journals and magazines that include the study of regulation, the JRE is unique in that it fills a gap in the market for a high quality journal dealing solely with the economics of regulation.Officially cited as: J Regul Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信