幼儿教育数字教育工具设计者的意图

Q1 Social Sciences
Maria Ploog , Tomasz Wiktorski
{"title":"幼儿教育数字教育工具设计者的意图","authors":"Maria Ploog ,&nbsp;Tomasz Wiktorski","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The popularity of programmable robots in early childhood education is growing. Such robots are discussed in the literature from the points of view of teachers, parents and children. We add the role of robot designers to this list. Focusing on designers and specifically their intentions is beneficial in two settings: in teacher training and whenever using the robots in playing activities in ECE. We present a qualitative study on robot designer intentions, conducted by group interviews with designers of two common but significantly different programmable robots, the <em>Kubo</em> robot and the <em>Rugged</em> robot. Using Activity Theory as the underlying framework for the thematic analysis of the interviews, our data reveal a large overlap of the intentions of both groups. They express the common goal of preparing children for the future although through slightly different competencies: enhancing computational thinking and 21st century skills, respectively. Both groups highlight the relevance of subjects outside computer science, specifically beyond coding. Our data also show a design process difference the <em>Rugged</em> robot was developed with a teacher-oriented approach whereas the <em>Kubo</em> robot with an object-oriented approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100653"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868924000217/pdfft?md5=82508243ec68fa6c4d534832299b9f7b&pid=1-s2.0-S2212868924000217-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The intentions of the designers of digital educational tools in early childhood education\",\"authors\":\"Maria Ploog ,&nbsp;Tomasz Wiktorski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The popularity of programmable robots in early childhood education is growing. Such robots are discussed in the literature from the points of view of teachers, parents and children. We add the role of robot designers to this list. Focusing on designers and specifically their intentions is beneficial in two settings: in teacher training and whenever using the robots in playing activities in ECE. We present a qualitative study on robot designer intentions, conducted by group interviews with designers of two common but significantly different programmable robots, the <em>Kubo</em> robot and the <em>Rugged</em> robot. Using Activity Theory as the underlying framework for the thematic analysis of the interviews, our data reveal a large overlap of the intentions of both groups. They express the common goal of preparing children for the future although through slightly different competencies: enhancing computational thinking and 21st century skills, respectively. Both groups highlight the relevance of subjects outside computer science, specifically beyond coding. Our data also show a design process difference the <em>Rugged</em> robot was developed with a teacher-oriented approach whereas the <em>Kubo</em> robot with an object-oriented approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868924000217/pdfft?md5=82508243ec68fa6c4d534832299b9f7b&pid=1-s2.0-S2212868924000217-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868924000217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868924000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可编程机器人在幼儿教育中越来越受欢迎。文献从教师、家长和儿童的角度对这些机器人进行了讨论。我们将机器人设计者的角色也列入其中。关注设计者,特别是他们的意图,在两种情况下都是有益的:教师培训和在幼儿教育的游戏活动中使用机器人。我们介绍了一项关于机器人设计者意图的定性研究,该研究通过小组访谈的方式进行,访谈对象是两款常见但有显著差异的可编程机器人--Kubo 机器人和 Rugged 机器人--的设计者。我们使用活动理论作为访谈主题分析的基础框架,我们的数据揭示了两组设计者意图的大量重叠之处。他们表达了共同的目标,即让孩子们为未来做好准备,尽管通过的能力略有不同:分别是增强计算思维和 21 世纪技能。两组学生都强调了计算机科学以外学科的相关性,特别是编码以外的学科。我们的数据还显示了设计过程的差异,Rugged 机器人的开发采用了面向教师的方法,而 Kubo 机器人则采用了面向对象的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The intentions of the designers of digital educational tools in early childhood education

The popularity of programmable robots in early childhood education is growing. Such robots are discussed in the literature from the points of view of teachers, parents and children. We add the role of robot designers to this list. Focusing on designers and specifically their intentions is beneficial in two settings: in teacher training and whenever using the robots in playing activities in ECE. We present a qualitative study on robot designer intentions, conducted by group interviews with designers of two common but significantly different programmable robots, the Kubo robot and the Rugged robot. Using Activity Theory as the underlying framework for the thematic analysis of the interviews, our data reveal a large overlap of the intentions of both groups. They express the common goal of preparing children for the future although through slightly different competencies: enhancing computational thinking and 21st century skills, respectively. Both groups highlight the relevance of subjects outside computer science, specifically beyond coding. Our data also show a design process difference the Rugged robot was developed with a teacher-oriented approach whereas the Kubo robot with an object-oriented approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信