Covid-19危重病人肝素的预防和治疗剂量与预后的相关性。

Rameshwar Alane, Venkatesh Khadke, Saleem Tamboli, P. Jadhav, Rahul Parsode
{"title":"Covid-19危重病人肝素的预防和治疗剂量与预后的相关性。","authors":"Rameshwar Alane, Venkatesh Khadke, Saleem Tamboli, P. Jadhav, Rahul Parsode","doi":"10.36106/ijar/6003165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction- Recently, a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), ofcially known as severe acute respiratory syndrome\ncoronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), caused a severe pandemic infection worldwide with considerable morbidity and\nmortality. A relatively high mortality of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worrying, and the application of heparin in COVID-19\nhas been recommended by some expert consensus because of the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation and venous thromboembolism.\nHowever, its efcacy remains to be validated.We aim to Correlate the association between prophylactic and therapeutic dosages of low\nmolecular weight heparin (LMWH) on mortality and other morbidity outcomes in critically ill patients of COVID-19 . Consecutive Methodspatients admitted to Dr. S. C.GMC Medical college and hospital Nanded with laboratory-conrmed COVID-19 were included in this\nretrospective observational study. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was established according to World Health Organization interim guidance and\nconrmed by RNA detection of the SARS-CoV-2 in the microbiology laboratory of the hospital. Outcomes between COVID-19 patients treated\nwith standard prophylactic LMWH enoxaparin dosage (subcutaneous enoxaparin 40–60 mg daily) or Therapeutic LMWH enoxaparin dosage\n(subcutaneous enoxaparin 40–60 mg twice daily) for 7 days were correlated. Out of 100 patients 50 re Results - ccived P-LMWH & 50 reccived\nT-LMWH among that 12 % patients expired in prophylactic group & 22% in therapeutic group. It was observed that the levels of D-dimer\nbefore & after of P-LMWH group were (D-dimer: 2.63±1.77, 0.63±1.19) and those of T-LMWH group were(D-dimer: 3.14 ± 2.15, 1.07 ±1.56 ).\nthe length of hospital stay was (11 ± 2.21) days in the P-LMWH group and (11 ± 3.99 ) Days in the T-LMWH group. Simillarly the saturation\nlevel of oxygen ware (SPO2 98% ) in P-LMWH group & (SPO2 97%) in T-LMWH group. 26% patients shows adverse effects to P-LMWH\ngroup & 32% patients to T-LMWH group. Study demonstrates that if you start earlier prophylactic LMW Conclusion- heparin to critically ill\npatients of covid 19 with raised D-dimer level the level of d-dimer will not further increased and comes down to normal value. Simillarly patients\nrecover earlier and reduces hospital stay of patients with improvement in oxygen saturation.","PeriodicalId":13502,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of applied research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CORRELATION OF PROPHYLACTIC AND THERAPEUTIC DOSE OF LMW HEPARIN WITH RESPECT TO OUTCOME IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS OF COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Rameshwar Alane, Venkatesh Khadke, Saleem Tamboli, P. Jadhav, Rahul Parsode\",\"doi\":\"10.36106/ijar/6003165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction- Recently, a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), ofcially known as severe acute respiratory syndrome\\ncoronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), caused a severe pandemic infection worldwide with considerable morbidity and\\nmortality. A relatively high mortality of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worrying, and the application of heparin in COVID-19\\nhas been recommended by some expert consensus because of the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation and venous thromboembolism.\\nHowever, its efcacy remains to be validated.We aim to Correlate the association between prophylactic and therapeutic dosages of low\\nmolecular weight heparin (LMWH) on mortality and other morbidity outcomes in critically ill patients of COVID-19 . Consecutive Methodspatients admitted to Dr. S. C.GMC Medical college and hospital Nanded with laboratory-conrmed COVID-19 were included in this\\nretrospective observational study. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was established according to World Health Organization interim guidance and\\nconrmed by RNA detection of the SARS-CoV-2 in the microbiology laboratory of the hospital. Outcomes between COVID-19 patients treated\\nwith standard prophylactic LMWH enoxaparin dosage (subcutaneous enoxaparin 40–60 mg daily) or Therapeutic LMWH enoxaparin dosage\\n(subcutaneous enoxaparin 40–60 mg twice daily) for 7 days were correlated. Out of 100 patients 50 re Results - ccived P-LMWH & 50 reccived\\nT-LMWH among that 12 % patients expired in prophylactic group & 22% in therapeutic group. It was observed that the levels of D-dimer\\nbefore & after of P-LMWH group were (D-dimer: 2.63±1.77, 0.63±1.19) and those of T-LMWH group were(D-dimer: 3.14 ± 2.15, 1.07 ±1.56 ).\\nthe length of hospital stay was (11 ± 2.21) days in the P-LMWH group and (11 ± 3.99 ) Days in the T-LMWH group. Simillarly the saturation\\nlevel of oxygen ware (SPO2 98% ) in P-LMWH group & (SPO2 97%) in T-LMWH group. 26% patients shows adverse effects to P-LMWH\\ngroup & 32% patients to T-LMWH group. Study demonstrates that if you start earlier prophylactic LMW Conclusion- heparin to critically ill\\npatients of covid 19 with raised D-dimer level the level of d-dimer will not further increased and comes down to normal value. Simillarly patients\\nrecover earlier and reduces hospital stay of patients with improvement in oxygen saturation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of applied research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of applied research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/6003165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of applied research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/6003165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言--最近,一种新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV),cially known as severe acute respiratory syndromecoronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2),在全球范围内引起了严重的大流行感染,造成了相当高的发病率和死亡率。2019 年严重冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相对较高的死亡率令人担忧,由于存在播散性血管内凝血和静脉血栓栓塞的风险,一些专家一致建议在 COVID-19 中应用肝素。我们的目的是研究低分子量肝素(LMWH)的预防和治疗剂量与 COVID-19 重症患者死亡率和其他发病率之间的关系。S.C.GMC医学院和南德医院收治的化验结果为COVID-19的连续患者被纳入这项回顾性观察研究。COVID-19的诊断是根据世界卫生组织的临时指南确定的,并通过医院微生物实验室检测到的SARS-CoV-2的RNA进行conrmed。对使用标准预防性 LMWH 依诺肝素剂量(皮下注射依诺肝素,每天 40-60 毫克)或治疗性 LMWH 依诺肝素剂量(皮下注射依诺肝素,每天两次,每次 40-60 毫克)治疗 7 天的 COVID-19 患者的疗效进行了比较。在 100 名患者中,50 人接受了 P-LMWH 治疗,50 人接受了 T-LMWH 治疗,其中 12% 的患者在预防组死亡,22% 的患者在治疗组死亡。据观察,P-LMWH 组前后的 D-二聚体水平分别为(D-二聚体:2.63±1.77,0.63±1.19),T-LMWH 组的 D-二聚体水平分别为(D-二聚体:3.14±2.15,1.07±1.56),P-LMWH 组的住院时间为(11±2.21)天,T-LMWH 组为(11±3.99)天。同样,P-LMWH 组的血氧饱和度为(SPO2 98%),T-LMWH 组为(SPO2 97%)。P-LMWH组有26%的患者出现不良反应,T-LMWH组有32%的患者出现不良反应。研究表明,如果对 D-二聚体水平升高的 covid 19 重症患者及早使用预防性 LMW 结论-肝素,D-二聚体水平就不会进一步升高,并会降至正常值。同样,患者也能更早康复,缩短住院时间,改善血氧饱和度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CORRELATION OF PROPHYLACTIC AND THERAPEUTIC DOSE OF LMW HEPARIN WITH RESPECT TO OUTCOME IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS OF COVID-19.
Introduction- Recently, a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), ofcially known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), caused a severe pandemic infection worldwide with considerable morbidity and mortality. A relatively high mortality of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worrying, and the application of heparin in COVID-19 has been recommended by some expert consensus because of the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation and venous thromboembolism. However, its efcacy remains to be validated.We aim to Correlate the association between prophylactic and therapeutic dosages of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on mortality and other morbidity outcomes in critically ill patients of COVID-19 . Consecutive Methodspatients admitted to Dr. S. C.GMC Medical college and hospital Nanded with laboratory-conrmed COVID-19 were included in this retrospective observational study. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was established according to World Health Organization interim guidance and conrmed by RNA detection of the SARS-CoV-2 in the microbiology laboratory of the hospital. Outcomes between COVID-19 patients treated with standard prophylactic LMWH enoxaparin dosage (subcutaneous enoxaparin 40–60 mg daily) or Therapeutic LMWH enoxaparin dosage (subcutaneous enoxaparin 40–60 mg twice daily) for 7 days were correlated. Out of 100 patients 50 re Results - ccived P-LMWH & 50 reccived T-LMWH among that 12 % patients expired in prophylactic group & 22% in therapeutic group. It was observed that the levels of D-dimer before & after of P-LMWH group were (D-dimer: 2.63±1.77, 0.63±1.19) and those of T-LMWH group were(D-dimer: 3.14 ± 2.15, 1.07 ±1.56 ). the length of hospital stay was (11 ± 2.21) days in the P-LMWH group and (11 ± 3.99 ) Days in the T-LMWH group. Simillarly the saturation level of oxygen ware (SPO2 98% ) in P-LMWH group & (SPO2 97%) in T-LMWH group. 26% patients shows adverse effects to P-LMWH group & 32% patients to T-LMWH group. Study demonstrates that if you start earlier prophylactic LMW Conclusion- heparin to critically ill patients of covid 19 with raised D-dimer level the level of d-dimer will not further increased and comes down to normal value. Simillarly patients recover earlier and reduces hospital stay of patients with improvement in oxygen saturation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信