NASEM 2021 对魁北克商业奶牛场牛奶蛋白产量预测的评估

S. Binggeli , H. Lapierre , R. Martineau , D.R. Ouellet , E. Charbonneau , D. Pellerin
{"title":"NASEM 2021 对魁北克商业奶牛场牛奶蛋白产量预测的评估","authors":"S. Binggeli ,&nbsp;H. Lapierre ,&nbsp;R. Martineau ,&nbsp;D.R. Ouellet ,&nbsp;E. Charbonneau ,&nbsp;D. Pellerin","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A recent study assessed the ability of 4 feed evaluation models to predict milk protein yield (MPY) in a commercial context, with data of 541 cows from 23 dairy herds in the province of Québec, Canada. However, the recently published Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM, 2021) was not released at that time. Thus, the current study evaluated NASEM using the same dataset. To be consistent with the previous study, predicted DMI was used. Therefore, MPY was predicted using the 2 estimations of DMI proposed by NASEM: one based on animal characteristics only (DMI<sub>Ao</sub>) and one also including ration characteristics (DMI<sub>A&amp;R</sub>). For each type of DMI estimates, 2 MPY predictions were made, using (1) the multivariate equation directly published in NASEM and (2) a variable efficiency of utilization of MP predicted using inputs and outputs from NASEM, published a posteriori. With the 2 approaches, multivariate and variable efficiency, the DMI<sub>A&amp;R</sub> yielded the best MPY predictions. The multivariate equation showed a regression bias between observed and predicted MPY with both DMI estimations. The estimated variable efficiency allowed for MPY predictions without mean and regression biases. With DMI<sub>A&amp;R</sub>, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were 0.72 and 0.78 for MPY predicted using the multivariate and variable efficiency equations, respectively. In comparison, DMI<sub>Ao</sub> CCC were 0.60 and 0.71, respectively. In conclusion, on commercial farms, where dairy rations are usually optimized for a group of cows, estimates of DMI based on animal and rations characteristics yielded the best MPY predictions. The multivariate equation from NASEM predicted MPY with a regression bias, whereas the variable efficiency of utilization of MP based on MP and energy supplies resulted in no bias in MPY predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"5 6","pages":"Pages 543-547"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM, 2021) feed evaluation model on predictions of milk protein yield on Québec commercial dairy farms\",\"authors\":\"S. Binggeli ,&nbsp;H. Lapierre ,&nbsp;R. Martineau ,&nbsp;D.R. Ouellet ,&nbsp;E. Charbonneau ,&nbsp;D. Pellerin\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A recent study assessed the ability of 4 feed evaluation models to predict milk protein yield (MPY) in a commercial context, with data of 541 cows from 23 dairy herds in the province of Québec, Canada. However, the recently published Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM, 2021) was not released at that time. Thus, the current study evaluated NASEM using the same dataset. To be consistent with the previous study, predicted DMI was used. Therefore, MPY was predicted using the 2 estimations of DMI proposed by NASEM: one based on animal characteristics only (DMI<sub>Ao</sub>) and one also including ration characteristics (DMI<sub>A&amp;R</sub>). For each type of DMI estimates, 2 MPY predictions were made, using (1) the multivariate equation directly published in NASEM and (2) a variable efficiency of utilization of MP predicted using inputs and outputs from NASEM, published a posteriori. With the 2 approaches, multivariate and variable efficiency, the DMI<sub>A&amp;R</sub> yielded the best MPY predictions. The multivariate equation showed a regression bias between observed and predicted MPY with both DMI estimations. The estimated variable efficiency allowed for MPY predictions without mean and regression biases. With DMI<sub>A&amp;R</sub>, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were 0.72 and 0.78 for MPY predicted using the multivariate and variable efficiency equations, respectively. In comparison, DMI<sub>Ao</sub> CCC were 0.60 and 0.71, respectively. In conclusion, on commercial farms, where dairy rations are usually optimized for a group of cows, estimates of DMI based on animal and rations characteristics yielded the best MPY predictions. The multivariate equation from NASEM predicted MPY with a regression bias, whereas the variable efficiency of utilization of MP based on MP and energy supplies resulted in no bias in MPY predictions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 543-547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的一项研究利用加拿大魁北克省 23 个奶牛场的 541 头奶牛的数据,评估了 4 种饲料评估模型在商业环境中预测牛奶蛋白质产量(MPY)的能力。然而,美国国家科学、工程和医学院(NASEM,2021 年)最近出版的《奶牛营养需求》当时尚未发布。因此,本研究使用相同的数据集对 NASEM 进行了评估。为了与之前的研究保持一致,使用了预测的 DMI。因此,使用 NASEM 提出的两种 DMI 估计值来预测 MPY:一种仅基于动物特征(DMIAo),另一种还包括日粮特征(DMIA&R)。对于每种类型的 DMI 估计值,均使用以下两种方法预测 MPY:(1) NASEM 直接公布的多变量方程;(2) 使用 NASEM 的输入和输出预测的 MP 可变利用效率(事后公布)。通过多变量和可变效率这两种方法,DMIA&R 得出的 MPY 预测结果最好。多变量方程显示,在两个 DMI 估计值中,观测到的 MPY 与预测的 MPY 之间存在回归偏差。估算的变量效率使 MPY 预测没有平均偏差和回归偏差。在 DMIA&R 中,使用多元方程和变量效率方程预测的 MPY 的一致性相关系数 (CCC) 分别为 0.72 和 0.78。相比之下,DMIAo 的 CCC 分别为 0.60 和 0.71。总之,在商业化牧场中,奶牛日粮通常是针对一组奶牛进行优化,根据动物和日粮特征估算的 DMI 预测 MPY 最佳。来自 NASEM 的多元方程对 MPY 的预测存在回归偏差,而基于 MP 和能量供应的 MP 利用效率变量对 MPY 的预测没有偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM, 2021) feed evaluation model on predictions of milk protein yield on Québec commercial dairy farms
A recent study assessed the ability of 4 feed evaluation models to predict milk protein yield (MPY) in a commercial context, with data of 541 cows from 23 dairy herds in the province of Québec, Canada. However, the recently published Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM, 2021) was not released at that time. Thus, the current study evaluated NASEM using the same dataset. To be consistent with the previous study, predicted DMI was used. Therefore, MPY was predicted using the 2 estimations of DMI proposed by NASEM: one based on animal characteristics only (DMIAo) and one also including ration characteristics (DMIA&R). For each type of DMI estimates, 2 MPY predictions were made, using (1) the multivariate equation directly published in NASEM and (2) a variable efficiency of utilization of MP predicted using inputs and outputs from NASEM, published a posteriori. With the 2 approaches, multivariate and variable efficiency, the DMIA&R yielded the best MPY predictions. The multivariate equation showed a regression bias between observed and predicted MPY with both DMI estimations. The estimated variable efficiency allowed for MPY predictions without mean and regression biases. With DMIA&R, concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were 0.72 and 0.78 for MPY predicted using the multivariate and variable efficiency equations, respectively. In comparison, DMIAo CCC were 0.60 and 0.71, respectively. In conclusion, on commercial farms, where dairy rations are usually optimized for a group of cows, estimates of DMI based on animal and rations characteristics yielded the best MPY predictions. The multivariate equation from NASEM predicted MPY with a regression bias, whereas the variable efficiency of utilization of MP based on MP and energy supplies resulted in no bias in MPY predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信