公共审计监督的成本:实际收益管理与创新损失

Phillip T. Lamoreaux, Noah M. Myers, Mason C. Snow
{"title":"公共审计监督的成本:实际收益管理与创新损失","authors":"Phillip T. Lamoreaux, Noah M. Myers, Mason C. Snow","doi":"10.2308/ajpt-2022-089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Prior research documents positive effects of PCAOB oversight on reporting and audit quality. However, to have a clear understanding of the net benefits of regulation, it is important to also investigate corresponding costs. To this end, we investigate the relation between PCAOB inspection oversight and real earnings management, a potentially value-destroying activity. We exploit the staggered timing of foreign governments’ allowance of PCAOB inspections in a generalized difference-in-differences design and find that companies engage in greater REM after the introduction of PCAOB inspection oversight. This relation is stronger for companies with a reduced ability to manage earnings via accruals. Lastly, we find a negative association between PCAOB oversight and innovation, particularly for firms making larger discretionary cuts to R&D expenditures. Collectively, our findings document unintended consequences of auditor regulatory oversight.\n JEL Classifications: G38; M41; M42; M48.","PeriodicalId":330359,"journal":{"name":"Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costs of Public Auditor Oversight: Real Earnings Management and Innovation Loss\",\"authors\":\"Phillip T. Lamoreaux, Noah M. Myers, Mason C. Snow\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/ajpt-2022-089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Prior research documents positive effects of PCAOB oversight on reporting and audit quality. However, to have a clear understanding of the net benefits of regulation, it is important to also investigate corresponding costs. To this end, we investigate the relation between PCAOB inspection oversight and real earnings management, a potentially value-destroying activity. We exploit the staggered timing of foreign governments’ allowance of PCAOB inspections in a generalized difference-in-differences design and find that companies engage in greater REM after the introduction of PCAOB inspection oversight. This relation is stronger for companies with a reduced ability to manage earnings via accruals. Lastly, we find a negative association between PCAOB oversight and innovation, particularly for firms making larger discretionary cuts to R&D expenditures. Collectively, our findings document unintended consequences of auditor regulatory oversight.\\n JEL Classifications: G38; M41; M42; M48.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2022-089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2022-089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

先前的研究记录了 PCAOB 监督对报告和审计质量的积极影响。然而,要清楚地了解监管的净收益,还必须调查相应的成本。为此,我们研究了 PCAOB 检查监督与实际收益管理(一种潜在的价值破坏活动)之间的关系。我们利用外国政府允许 PCAOB 检查的交错时间进行广义差分设计,发现在引入 PCAOB 检查监督后,公司会进行更多的 REM。对于通过应计制管理收益的能力下降的公司来说,这种关系更为密切。最后,我们发现 PCAOB 监督与创新之间存在负相关关系,尤其是那些随意削减研发支出的公司。总之,我们的研究结果记录了审计师监管的意外后果。JEL Classifications:G38;M41;M42;M48。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Costs of Public Auditor Oversight: Real Earnings Management and Innovation Loss
Prior research documents positive effects of PCAOB oversight on reporting and audit quality. However, to have a clear understanding of the net benefits of regulation, it is important to also investigate corresponding costs. To this end, we investigate the relation between PCAOB inspection oversight and real earnings management, a potentially value-destroying activity. We exploit the staggered timing of foreign governments’ allowance of PCAOB inspections in a generalized difference-in-differences design and find that companies engage in greater REM after the introduction of PCAOB inspection oversight. This relation is stronger for companies with a reduced ability to manage earnings via accruals. Lastly, we find a negative association between PCAOB oversight and innovation, particularly for firms making larger discretionary cuts to R&D expenditures. Collectively, our findings document unintended consequences of auditor regulatory oversight. JEL Classifications: G38; M41; M42; M48.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信