Kira Oberschmidt, C. Grünloh, S. Jansen-Kosterink, Monique Tabak
{"title":"快而不脏:快闪研究作为电子健康行动研究方法的实用性","authors":"Kira Oberschmidt, C. Grünloh, S. Jansen-Kosterink, Monique Tabak","doi":"10.35844/001c.92284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Action research (AR) is a participatory research approach that works in iterative cycles that are conducted in practice. However, some cycles of AR can take a long time, slowing down the speed of iterations. Therefore, in this study we investigate the use of a relatively new method for AR: the flash mob. Flash mob studies lend themselves to spontaneous, unplanned participation, by collecting large amounts of data in a short time, while also analyzing and reporting quickly on findings. To investigate the applicability of the flash mob as a method for AR in eHealth projects, we conducted three flash mob studies in two research projects and drew recommendations based on observations, reflections and short pre- and post-surveys. Outcomes show that the flash mob is a potential method for AR, as it is situated in a practical setting where stakeholders can easily be involved, and its pace could speed up the AR cycles. To further improve the applicability for AR, our main recommendations include: promoting the flash mob adequately to increase participation and improve the involvement of ‘champions’; tracking interactions outside the flash mob (e.g., comments and questions from bystanders); and choosing an accessible and visible location, taking into account the activities associated with the location.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quick, but Not Dirty: The Usefulness of Flash Mob Studies as a Method for Action Research in eHealth\",\"authors\":\"Kira Oberschmidt, C. Grünloh, S. Jansen-Kosterink, Monique Tabak\",\"doi\":\"10.35844/001c.92284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Action research (AR) is a participatory research approach that works in iterative cycles that are conducted in practice. However, some cycles of AR can take a long time, slowing down the speed of iterations. Therefore, in this study we investigate the use of a relatively new method for AR: the flash mob. Flash mob studies lend themselves to spontaneous, unplanned participation, by collecting large amounts of data in a short time, while also analyzing and reporting quickly on findings. To investigate the applicability of the flash mob as a method for AR in eHealth projects, we conducted three flash mob studies in two research projects and drew recommendations based on observations, reflections and short pre- and post-surveys. Outcomes show that the flash mob is a potential method for AR, as it is situated in a practical setting where stakeholders can easily be involved, and its pace could speed up the AR cycles. To further improve the applicability for AR, our main recommendations include: promoting the flash mob adequately to increase participation and improve the involvement of ‘champions’; tracking interactions outside the flash mob (e.g., comments and questions from bystanders); and choosing an accessible and visible location, taking into account the activities associated with the location.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of participatory research methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of participatory research methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.92284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.92284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
行动研究(AR)是一种参与式研究方法,它以迭代循环的方式在实践中开展。然而,行动研究的某些周期可能需要很长时间,从而减慢了迭代的速度。因此,在本研究中,我们调查了一种相对较新的 AR 方法的使用情况:快闪。快闪研究适合自发、无计划的参与,可以在短时间内收集大量数据,同时还能快速分析和报告研究结果。为了研究快闪作为 AR 方法在电子健康项目中的适用性,我们在两个研究项目中进行了三次快闪研究,并根据观察、反思和简短的前后调查提出了建议。研究结果表明,快闪活动是一种潜在的增强现实能力方法,因为它处于一种实际环境中,利益相关者可以很容易地参与进来,而且它的节奏可以加快增强现实能力的周期。为进一步提高 AR 的适用性,我们的主要建议包括:充分宣传快闪活动,以提高参与度和 "拥护者 "的参与度;跟踪快闪活动之外的互动情况(如旁观者的评论和问题);选择一个方便可见的地点,并考虑到与该地点相关的活动。
Quick, but Not Dirty: The Usefulness of Flash Mob Studies as a Method for Action Research in eHealth
Action research (AR) is a participatory research approach that works in iterative cycles that are conducted in practice. However, some cycles of AR can take a long time, slowing down the speed of iterations. Therefore, in this study we investigate the use of a relatively new method for AR: the flash mob. Flash mob studies lend themselves to spontaneous, unplanned participation, by collecting large amounts of data in a short time, while also analyzing and reporting quickly on findings. To investigate the applicability of the flash mob as a method for AR in eHealth projects, we conducted three flash mob studies in two research projects and drew recommendations based on observations, reflections and short pre- and post-surveys. Outcomes show that the flash mob is a potential method for AR, as it is situated in a practical setting where stakeholders can easily be involved, and its pace could speed up the AR cycles. To further improve the applicability for AR, our main recommendations include: promoting the flash mob adequately to increase participation and improve the involvement of ‘champions’; tracking interactions outside the flash mob (e.g., comments and questions from bystanders); and choosing an accessible and visible location, taking into account the activities associated with the location.