Samuel Rantataro , Laura Ferrer Pascual , Tomi Laurila
{"title":"胺类神经递质的电化学检测在缓冲溶液、体内和细胞培养系统中存在巨大差异","authors":"Samuel Rantataro , Laura Ferrer Pascual , Tomi Laurila","doi":"10.1016/j.elecom.2024.107732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Detection of neurotransmitters requires high sensitivity and temporal resolution, favoring electrochemical techniques for the sensing mechanism. However, electrochemical detection of amine neurotransmitters is highly dependent on electrode surface condition and thus, results obtained in clean buffer solutions are not directly applicable to the real measurement environment <em>in vivo</em> or <em>in vitro</em>. In these more complex electrolyte solutions, the presence of antioxidants and surface-adsorbing molecules drastically alters the redox characteristics of amine neurotransmitters, their precursors and metabolites. Accordingly, we surveyed their redox characteristics in the phosphate buffered saline (PBS), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and cell culture medium, with high-sensitivity electrodes made of single-walled carbon nanotube network.</div><div>The concentration of surface-fouling molecules was lowest in the PBS and highest in the culture medium. Accordingly, electrochemical reaction kinetics were facile in the PBS and sluggish in the culture medium. Surprisingly, analyte molecular structure had much more importance in the CSF compared to other electrolytes, however the reaction kinetics remained to be generally slower in the CSF compared to when measured in the PBS.</div><div>Whereas the CSF also contains L-Ascorbic acid and uric acid that are electrochemically active interfering molecules, they are either completely absent or can be omitted in the <em>in vitro</em> setting. On the contrast, the culture medium contains substantially higher concentration of surface-adsorbing molecules that causes more significant fouling of electrode and thus loss of sensitivity. As the <em>in vitro</em> brain-on-a-chip applications are rapidly being adopted, direct comparison of these different experimental settings was essential to understand their implications for electrochemical sensors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":304,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemistry Communications","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 107732"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrochemical detection of amine neurotransmitters is drastically different in buffer solutions, in vivo, and cell culture systems\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Rantataro , Laura Ferrer Pascual , Tomi Laurila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elecom.2024.107732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Detection of neurotransmitters requires high sensitivity and temporal resolution, favoring electrochemical techniques for the sensing mechanism. However, electrochemical detection of amine neurotransmitters is highly dependent on electrode surface condition and thus, results obtained in clean buffer solutions are not directly applicable to the real measurement environment <em>in vivo</em> or <em>in vitro</em>. In these more complex electrolyte solutions, the presence of antioxidants and surface-adsorbing molecules drastically alters the redox characteristics of amine neurotransmitters, their precursors and metabolites. Accordingly, we surveyed their redox characteristics in the phosphate buffered saline (PBS), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and cell culture medium, with high-sensitivity electrodes made of single-walled carbon nanotube network.</div><div>The concentration of surface-fouling molecules was lowest in the PBS and highest in the culture medium. Accordingly, electrochemical reaction kinetics were facile in the PBS and sluggish in the culture medium. Surprisingly, analyte molecular structure had much more importance in the CSF compared to other electrolytes, however the reaction kinetics remained to be generally slower in the CSF compared to when measured in the PBS.</div><div>Whereas the CSF also contains L-Ascorbic acid and uric acid that are electrochemically active interfering molecules, they are either completely absent or can be omitted in the <em>in vitro</em> setting. On the contrast, the culture medium contains substantially higher concentration of surface-adsorbing molecules that causes more significant fouling of electrode and thus loss of sensitivity. As the <em>in vitro</em> brain-on-a-chip applications are rapidly being adopted, direct comparison of these different experimental settings was essential to understand their implications for electrochemical sensors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electrochemistry Communications\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electrochemistry Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388248124000754\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ELECTROCHEMISTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrochemistry Communications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388248124000754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrochemical detection of amine neurotransmitters is drastically different in buffer solutions, in vivo, and cell culture systems
Detection of neurotransmitters requires high sensitivity and temporal resolution, favoring electrochemical techniques for the sensing mechanism. However, electrochemical detection of amine neurotransmitters is highly dependent on electrode surface condition and thus, results obtained in clean buffer solutions are not directly applicable to the real measurement environment in vivo or in vitro. In these more complex electrolyte solutions, the presence of antioxidants and surface-adsorbing molecules drastically alters the redox characteristics of amine neurotransmitters, their precursors and metabolites. Accordingly, we surveyed their redox characteristics in the phosphate buffered saline (PBS), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and cell culture medium, with high-sensitivity electrodes made of single-walled carbon nanotube network.
The concentration of surface-fouling molecules was lowest in the PBS and highest in the culture medium. Accordingly, electrochemical reaction kinetics were facile in the PBS and sluggish in the culture medium. Surprisingly, analyte molecular structure had much more importance in the CSF compared to other electrolytes, however the reaction kinetics remained to be generally slower in the CSF compared to when measured in the PBS.
Whereas the CSF also contains L-Ascorbic acid and uric acid that are electrochemically active interfering molecules, they are either completely absent or can be omitted in the in vitro setting. On the contrast, the culture medium contains substantially higher concentration of surface-adsorbing molecules that causes more significant fouling of electrode and thus loss of sensitivity. As the in vitro brain-on-a-chip applications are rapidly being adopted, direct comparison of these different experimental settings was essential to understand their implications for electrochemical sensors.
期刊介绍:
Electrochemistry Communications is an open access journal providing fast dissemination of short communications, full communications and mini reviews covering the whole field of electrochemistry which merit urgent publication. Short communications are limited to a maximum of 20,000 characters (including spaces) while full communications and mini reviews are limited to 25,000 characters (including spaces). Supplementary information is permitted for full communications and mini reviews but not for short communications. We aim to be the fastest journal in electrochemistry for these types of papers.