{"title":"在社会环境内和社会环境之间进行辩解,并有可能推迟做出选择","authors":"Hadi Pahlevan Yazdanabad","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides axiomatic characterizations for a class of models where a decision maker (henceforth, DM) maximizes a single preference ranking subject to a shortlist that depends on the underlying choice set and social context. Thus, the primitive is a dataset of choices from every choice set – social context pair that is called the context. The DM is supposed to choose the most preferred option from the shortlist of each context. However, due to existence of conflicting norms (or norms uncertainty), he/she might choose no option in some contexts. Therefore, unlike existing justification models, choice deferral is possible in our framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102985"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justification within and between social contexts with the possibility of choice deferral\",\"authors\":\"Hadi Pahlevan Yazdanabad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper provides axiomatic characterizations for a class of models where a decision maker (henceforth, DM) maximizes a single preference ranking subject to a shortlist that depends on the underlying choice set and social context. Thus, the primitive is a dataset of choices from every choice set – social context pair that is called the context. The DM is supposed to choose the most preferred option from the shortlist of each context. However, due to existence of conflicting norms (or norms uncertainty), he/she might choose no option in some contexts. Therefore, unlike existing justification models, choice deferral is possible in our framework.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematical Economics\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102985\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406824000478\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406824000478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Justification within and between social contexts with the possibility of choice deferral
This paper provides axiomatic characterizations for a class of models where a decision maker (henceforth, DM) maximizes a single preference ranking subject to a shortlist that depends on the underlying choice set and social context. Thus, the primitive is a dataset of choices from every choice set – social context pair that is called the context. The DM is supposed to choose the most preferred option from the shortlist of each context. However, due to existence of conflicting norms (or norms uncertainty), he/she might choose no option in some contexts. Therefore, unlike existing justification models, choice deferral is possible in our framework.
期刊介绍:
The primary objective of the Journal is to provide a forum for work in economic theory which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. For work to add to this primary objective, it is not sufficient that the mathematical reasoning be new and correct. The work must have real economic content. The economic ideas must be interesting and important. These ideas may pertain to any field of economics or any school of economic thought.