内窥镜检查中的知情同意:阅读、理解,还是仅仅签字?

iGIE Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2024.04.001
Ana Catarina Carvalho MD , Ricardo Cardoso MD , Hugo Marcelo Vieira MD , Américo Silva MD
{"title":"内窥镜检查中的知情同意:阅读、理解,还是仅仅签字?","authors":"Ana Catarina Carvalho MD ,&nbsp;Ricardo Cardoso MD ,&nbsp;Hugo Marcelo Vieira MD ,&nbsp;Américo Silva MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Although informed consent is a requirement for all interventional procedures such as those in GI endoscopy, its standardization is a challenge. Very thorough documents have been proposed, but it is unknown whether patients actually read them. We evaluated if patients read and understand informed consent forms and information leaflets for GI endoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, prospective, observational study was performed between April 2021 and April 2022 and included adult patients proposed for outpatient elective EGD and colonoscopy. Informed consent forms and information leaflets were mailed to patients, with a small text instruction added to the informed consent form. Before endoscopy, we assessed whether patients adequately read the informed consent form, based on patient signature, table questionnaire completion, and performance of the text instruction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 232 patients (50.6% men; mean age, 63.8 ± 12.76 years). Most had only a basic education (78.0%) and had previously undergone GI endoscopy (90.6%). Of the patients, 86.6% stated they had read the form and 13.4% did not. Although most signed the form (83.6%), only 24.6% adequately read and understood it. No statistically significant association between an adequate reading of the informed consent form and any of the assessed variables was found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the timely provision of information, most patients do not read or adequately understand the provided documents. It is necessary to develop new strategies to enhance patients’ involvement in decision-making, thus improving the doctor–patient relationship in obtaining informed consent. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05414435.)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 222-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000347/pdfft?md5=32c726985f9cbaf47d32df66dd0807c5&pid=1-s2.0-S2949708624000347-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informed consent in endoscopy: Read, understood, or just signed?\",\"authors\":\"Ana Catarina Carvalho MD ,&nbsp;Ricardo Cardoso MD ,&nbsp;Hugo Marcelo Vieira MD ,&nbsp;Américo Silva MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.igie.2024.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Although informed consent is a requirement for all interventional procedures such as those in GI endoscopy, its standardization is a challenge. Very thorough documents have been proposed, but it is unknown whether patients actually read them. We evaluated if patients read and understand informed consent forms and information leaflets for GI endoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, prospective, observational study was performed between April 2021 and April 2022 and included adult patients proposed for outpatient elective EGD and colonoscopy. Informed consent forms and information leaflets were mailed to patients, with a small text instruction added to the informed consent form. Before endoscopy, we assessed whether patients adequately read the informed consent form, based on patient signature, table questionnaire completion, and performance of the text instruction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 232 patients (50.6% men; mean age, 63.8 ± 12.76 years). Most had only a basic education (78.0%) and had previously undergone GI endoscopy (90.6%). Of the patients, 86.6% stated they had read the form and 13.4% did not. Although most signed the form (83.6%), only 24.6% adequately read and understood it. No statistically significant association between an adequate reading of the informed consent form and any of the assessed variables was found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the timely provision of information, most patients do not read or adequately understand the provided documents. It is necessary to develop new strategies to enhance patients’ involvement in decision-making, thus improving the doctor–patient relationship in obtaining informed consent. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05414435.)</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iGIE\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 222-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000347/pdfft?md5=32c726985f9cbaf47d32df66dd0807c5&pid=1-s2.0-S2949708624000347-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iGIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的虽然知情同意书是所有介入手术(如消化内镜手术)的必要条件,但其标准化却是一项挑战。虽然已经提出了非常详尽的文件,但患者是否真正阅读这些文件仍是未知数。我们评估了患者是否阅读并理解消化内镜检查的知情同意书和信息单。方法这项单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究于 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 4 月间进行,研究对象包括拟在门诊择期接受胃肠道造影术和结肠镜检查的成年患者。我们向患者邮寄了知情同意书和信息宣传单,并在知情同意书上添加了小文字说明。内镜检查前,我们根据患者的签名、表格问卷的填写情况以及文字说明的执行情况,评估患者是否充分阅读了知情同意书。大多数患者仅受过基础教育(78.0%),以前接受过消化内镜检查(90.6%)。86.6%的患者表示已阅读过表格,13.4%的患者表示未阅读过表格。虽然大多数患者(83.6%)在表格上签了字,但只有 24.6% 的患者充分阅读并理解了表格。尽管及时提供了信息,但大多数患者并未阅读或充分理解所提供的文件。有必要制定新的策略来提高患者对决策的参与度,从而在获得知情同意的过程中改善医患关系。(临床试验注册号:NCT05414435)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informed consent in endoscopy: Read, understood, or just signed?

Background and Aims

Although informed consent is a requirement for all interventional procedures such as those in GI endoscopy, its standardization is a challenge. Very thorough documents have been proposed, but it is unknown whether patients actually read them. We evaluated if patients read and understand informed consent forms and information leaflets for GI endoscopy.

Methods

This single-center, prospective, observational study was performed between April 2021 and April 2022 and included adult patients proposed for outpatient elective EGD and colonoscopy. Informed consent forms and information leaflets were mailed to patients, with a small text instruction added to the informed consent form. Before endoscopy, we assessed whether patients adequately read the informed consent form, based on patient signature, table questionnaire completion, and performance of the text instruction.

Results

The study included 232 patients (50.6% men; mean age, 63.8 ± 12.76 years). Most had only a basic education (78.0%) and had previously undergone GI endoscopy (90.6%). Of the patients, 86.6% stated they had read the form and 13.4% did not. Although most signed the form (83.6%), only 24.6% adequately read and understood it. No statistically significant association between an adequate reading of the informed consent form and any of the assessed variables was found.

Conclusions

Despite the timely provision of information, most patients do not read or adequately understand the provided documents. It is necessary to develop new strategies to enhance patients’ involvement in decision-making, thus improving the doctor–patient relationship in obtaining informed consent. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05414435.)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信