歧视、多元主义和社会从属关系：论莫罗的《不平等面面观

Q4 Social Sciences

Dialogue Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1017/s0012217323000276

Andrea Sangiovanni

{"title":"歧视、多元主义和社会从属关系：论莫罗的《不平等面面观","authors":"Andrea Sangiovanni","doi":"10.1017/s0012217323000276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sophia Moreau's wide-ranging and nuanced book defends a pluralist view of wrongful discrimination. I argue three points. First, I argue that Moreau's account of deliberative freedom does not provide a distinct ground for objecting to discrimination. Second, I argue that there is not as wide a gap between her view and expressivism as she makes there out to be. Third, there is an intriguing gap in the argument that deserves further exploration: Moreau never provides us with an account of when and why social subordination is wrong.","PeriodicalId":11232,"journal":{"name":"Dialogue","volume":"591 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination, Pluralism, and Social Subordination: On Moreau's Faces of Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Sangiovanni\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0012217323000276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sophia Moreau's wide-ranging and nuanced book defends a pluralist view of wrongful discrimination. I argue three points. First, I argue that Moreau's account of deliberative freedom does not provide a distinct ground for objecting to discrimination. Second, I argue that there is not as wide a gap between her view and expressivism as she makes there out to be. Third, there is an intriguing gap in the argument that deserves further exploration: Moreau never provides us with an account of when and why social subordination is wrong.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogue\",\"volume\":\"591 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217323000276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217323000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

索菲亚-莫罗（Sophia Moreau）在这本内容广泛、细致入微的书中捍卫了对不正当歧视的多元化观点。我的论点有三。首先，我认为莫罗关于审议自由的论述并没有为反对歧视提供独特的理由。其次，我认为她的观点与表达主义之间的差距并不像她所说的那样大。第三，她的论证中存在一个耐人寻味的漏洞，值得进一步探讨：莫罗从未向我们说明社会从属地位何时以及为何是错误的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Discrimination, Pluralism, and Social Subordination: On Moreau's Faces of Inequality

Sophia Moreau's wide-ranging and nuanced book defends a pluralist view of wrongful discrimination. I argue three points. First, I argue that Moreau's account of deliberative freedom does not provide a distinct ground for objecting to discrimination. Second, I argue that there is not as wide a gap between her view and expressivism as she makes there out to be. Third, there is an intriguing gap in the argument that deserves further exploration: Moreau never provides us with an account of when and why social subordination is wrong.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dialogue Social Sciences-Development

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dialogue is the official journal of the Canadian Philosophical Association. Its purpose is to publish high quality peer-reviewed scholarly articles, book symposia, critical notices, and book reviews in English and in French, in support of the Association"s mandate to promote philosophical scholarship and education. It is open to contributions in all branches of philosophy and from any philosophical perspective. Readers include professional teachers of philosophy, graduate students, and others with an interest in the field. Published for the Canadian Philosophical Association