VOTAT 在行动

Matthias Stadler, Amadeus J. Pickal, Laura Brandl, Florian Krieger
{"title":"VOTAT 在行动","authors":"Matthias Stadler, Amadeus J. Pickal, Laura Brandl, Florian Krieger","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/a000559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In our study, we integrated the vary-one-thing-at-a-time (VOTAT) strategy within epistemic activities in knowledge-lean problem-solving. VOTAT, altering a single variable while keeping others constant, was examined through a dual approach: an empirical analysis with MicroDYN tasks and a theoretical discussion. Empirically, we identified differences among participants who fully engaged in the VOTAT loop, those with incomplete loops, and nonusers. These distinctions were evident in their problem-solving approaches, hypothesis formulation, and decision-making efficiency. Theoretically, we contextualized VOTAT's role within epistemic activities, extending its application beyond the specific tasks in our study. Our findings reveal that VOTAT's use markedly impacts problem-solving processes, demonstrating varied cognitive strategies among different participant groups. This has implications for understanding problem-solving cognition and designing tasks that better capture the nuances of epistemic activities.","PeriodicalId":263823,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","volume":"703 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VOTAT in Action\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Stadler, Amadeus J. Pickal, Laura Brandl, Florian Krieger\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2151-2604/a000559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: In our study, we integrated the vary-one-thing-at-a-time (VOTAT) strategy within epistemic activities in knowledge-lean problem-solving. VOTAT, altering a single variable while keeping others constant, was examined through a dual approach: an empirical analysis with MicroDYN tasks and a theoretical discussion. Empirically, we identified differences among participants who fully engaged in the VOTAT loop, those with incomplete loops, and nonusers. These distinctions were evident in their problem-solving approaches, hypothesis formulation, and decision-making efficiency. Theoretically, we contextualized VOTAT's role within epistemic activities, extending its application beyond the specific tasks in our study. Our findings reveal that VOTAT's use markedly impacts problem-solving processes, demonstrating varied cognitive strategies among different participant groups. This has implications for understanding problem-solving cognition and designing tasks that better capture the nuances of epistemic activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"703 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在我们的研究中,我们将 "一次改变一件事"(VOTAT)策略纳入了知识导向问题解决的认识活动中。VOTAT 是在保持其他变量不变的情况下改变单个变量的策略,我们通过双重方法对其进行了研究:使用 MicroDYN 任务进行实证分析和理论讨论。通过实证分析,我们发现了完全参与 VOTAT 循环的参与者、循环不完整的参与者和非参与者之间的差异。这些差异体现在他们解决问题的方法、假设的提出和决策的效率上。从理论上讲,我们对 VOTAT 在认识活动中的作用进行了背景分析,将其应用范围扩展到研究的具体任务之外。我们的研究结果表明,VOTAT 的使用对问题解决过程产生了显著影响,在不同的参与者群体中表现出不同的认知策略。这对理解问题解决认知和设计能更好地捕捉认识活动细微差别的任务具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VOTAT in Action
Abstract: In our study, we integrated the vary-one-thing-at-a-time (VOTAT) strategy within epistemic activities in knowledge-lean problem-solving. VOTAT, altering a single variable while keeping others constant, was examined through a dual approach: an empirical analysis with MicroDYN tasks and a theoretical discussion. Empirically, we identified differences among participants who fully engaged in the VOTAT loop, those with incomplete loops, and nonusers. These distinctions were evident in their problem-solving approaches, hypothesis formulation, and decision-making efficiency. Theoretically, we contextualized VOTAT's role within epistemic activities, extending its application beyond the specific tasks in our study. Our findings reveal that VOTAT's use markedly impacts problem-solving processes, demonstrating varied cognitive strategies among different participant groups. This has implications for understanding problem-solving cognition and designing tasks that better capture the nuances of epistemic activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信