Matthias Stadler, Amadeus J. Pickal, Laura Brandl, Florian Krieger
{"title":"VOTAT 在行动","authors":"Matthias Stadler, Amadeus J. Pickal, Laura Brandl, Florian Krieger","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/a000559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In our study, we integrated the vary-one-thing-at-a-time (VOTAT) strategy within epistemic activities in knowledge-lean problem-solving. VOTAT, altering a single variable while keeping others constant, was examined through a dual approach: an empirical analysis with MicroDYN tasks and a theoretical discussion. Empirically, we identified differences among participants who fully engaged in the VOTAT loop, those with incomplete loops, and nonusers. These distinctions were evident in their problem-solving approaches, hypothesis formulation, and decision-making efficiency. Theoretically, we contextualized VOTAT's role within epistemic activities, extending its application beyond the specific tasks in our study. Our findings reveal that VOTAT's use markedly impacts problem-solving processes, demonstrating varied cognitive strategies among different participant groups. This has implications for understanding problem-solving cognition and designing tasks that better capture the nuances of epistemic activities.","PeriodicalId":263823,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","volume":"703 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VOTAT in Action\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Stadler, Amadeus J. Pickal, Laura Brandl, Florian Krieger\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2151-2604/a000559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: In our study, we integrated the vary-one-thing-at-a-time (VOTAT) strategy within epistemic activities in knowledge-lean problem-solving. VOTAT, altering a single variable while keeping others constant, was examined through a dual approach: an empirical analysis with MicroDYN tasks and a theoretical discussion. Empirically, we identified differences among participants who fully engaged in the VOTAT loop, those with incomplete loops, and nonusers. These distinctions were evident in their problem-solving approaches, hypothesis formulation, and decision-making efficiency. Theoretically, we contextualized VOTAT's role within epistemic activities, extending its application beyond the specific tasks in our study. Our findings reveal that VOTAT's use markedly impacts problem-solving processes, demonstrating varied cognitive strategies among different participant groups. This has implications for understanding problem-solving cognition and designing tasks that better capture the nuances of epistemic activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für Psychologie\",\"volume\":\"703 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract: In our study, we integrated the vary-one-thing-at-a-time (VOTAT) strategy within epistemic activities in knowledge-lean problem-solving. VOTAT, altering a single variable while keeping others constant, was examined through a dual approach: an empirical analysis with MicroDYN tasks and a theoretical discussion. Empirically, we identified differences among participants who fully engaged in the VOTAT loop, those with incomplete loops, and nonusers. These distinctions were evident in their problem-solving approaches, hypothesis formulation, and decision-making efficiency. Theoretically, we contextualized VOTAT's role within epistemic activities, extending its application beyond the specific tasks in our study. Our findings reveal that VOTAT's use markedly impacts problem-solving processes, demonstrating varied cognitive strategies among different participant groups. This has implications for understanding problem-solving cognition and designing tasks that better capture the nuances of epistemic activities.