基于治疗强度的糖尿病黄斑水肿一年期抗血管内皮生长因子治疗效果:来自 FRB!登记处的数据。

IF 4.4 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
{"title":"基于治疗强度的糖尿病黄斑水肿一年期抗血管内皮生长因子治疗效果:来自 FRB!登记处的数据。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare 1-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based on the proportion of visits where intravitreal VEGF inhibitor injections were delivered.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>There were 2288 treatment-naive eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy from October 31, 2015 to October 31, 2021 from the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n = 1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n = 1116).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Mean visual acuity (VA) change after 12 months of treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment was 3.6 (2.8–4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4–5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (<em>P</em> = 0.005). The mean (95% CI) central subfield thickness (CST) change was −69 (−76 to −61) μm and −85 (−92 to −78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.002). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the number of injections received over 12 months of treatment and the change in VA (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a moderately greater CST reduction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This registry analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468653024001829/pdfft?md5=a737b56b13893b703fbf97e56e8321e5&pid=1-s2.0-S2468653024001829-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Year Anti-VEGF Therapy Outcomes in Diabetic Macular Edema Based on Treatment Intensity\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oret.2024.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare 1-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based on the proportion of visits where intravitreal VEGF inhibitor injections were delivered.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>There were 2288 treatment-naive eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy from October 31, 2015 to October 31, 2021 from the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n = 1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n = 1116).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Mean visual acuity (VA) change after 12 months of treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment was 3.6 (2.8–4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4–5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (<em>P</em> = 0.005). The mean (95% CI) central subfield thickness (CST) change was −69 (−76 to −61) μm and −85 (−92 to −78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.002). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the number of injections received over 12 months of treatment and the change in VA (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a moderately greater CST reduction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This registry analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468653024001829/pdfft?md5=a737b56b13893b703fbf97e56e8321e5&pid=1-s2.0-S2468653024001829-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468653024001829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468653024001829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计队列研究。参与者从 2015 年 10 月 31 日到 2021 年 10 月 31 日,共有 2288 只未经治疗的 DME 患眼开始接受玻璃体内血管内皮生长因子抑制剂治疗,这些患眼来自抗击视网膜失明!国际成果登记处。方法根据接受注射的就诊比例对患者进行分组,A 组低于中位数 67%(n = 1172),B 组高于中位数(n = 1116)。结果治疗 12 个月后,A 组眼睛的平均视力变化为 3.6(2.8-4.4)个字母,而 B 组眼睛的平均视力变化为 5.2(4.4-5.9)个字母(P = 0.005)。A 组与 B 组的平均(95% CI)中央子场厚度(CST)变化分别为-69(-76 至 -61)微米和-85(-92 至 -78)微米(P = 0.002)。在 12 个月的治疗过程中,接受注射的次数与视力变化呈中度正相关(P = 0.001)。结论这项登记分析发现,在接受玻璃体内血管内皮生长因子抑制剂治疗的第一年中,接受治疗次数较多的 DME 眼睛的总体 VA 和解剖结果往往更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-Year Anti-VEGF Therapy Outcomes in Diabetic Macular Edema Based on Treatment Intensity

Purpose

To compare 1-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based on the proportion of visits where intravitreal VEGF inhibitor injections were delivered.

Design

Cohort study.

Participants

There were 2288 treatment-naive eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy from October 31, 2015 to October 31, 2021 from the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.

Methods

Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n = 1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n = 1116).

Main Outcome Measures

Mean visual acuity (VA) change after 12 months of treatment.

Results

The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment was 3.6 (2.8–4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4–5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (P = 0.005). The mean (95% CI) central subfield thickness (CST) change was −69 (−76 to −61) μm and −85 (−92 to −78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (P = 0.002). A moderate positive correlation was observed between the number of injections received over 12 months of treatment and the change in VA (P < 0.001). Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a moderately greater CST reduction.

Conclusions

This registry analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Retina
Ophthalmology. Retina Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信