艺术治疗机构中的交叉护理伦理

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Catherine Hyland Moon , Kimberly Faulkner
{"title":"艺术治疗机构中的交叉护理伦理","authors":"Catherine Hyland Moon ,&nbsp;Kimberly Faulkner","doi":"10.1016/j.aip.2024.102165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents intersectional care ethics as a framework for inclusive, anti-oppressive organizational structures and practices. A brief literature review documents the increasing demand in the art therapy field for theory and practice that is politically engaged and rooted in social justice. Two frameworks for analyzing an organization’s alignment with justice and equity are discussed: intersectionality theory and care ethics. Barriers to creating and maintaining just, equitable, and ethical organizations are also described, and examples are provided for how these barriers have been enacted in one professional association. The article concludes with recommendations posed in the form of questions intended to inspire creative conceptualizations of how intersectional care ethics might become manifest within art therapy organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47590,"journal":{"name":"Arts in Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersectional care ethics in art therapy organizations\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Hyland Moon ,&nbsp;Kimberly Faulkner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aip.2024.102165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article presents intersectional care ethics as a framework for inclusive, anti-oppressive organizational structures and practices. A brief literature review documents the increasing demand in the art therapy field for theory and practice that is politically engaged and rooted in social justice. Two frameworks for analyzing an organization’s alignment with justice and equity are discussed: intersectionality theory and care ethics. Barriers to creating and maintaining just, equitable, and ethical organizations are also described, and examples are provided for how these barriers have been enacted in one professional association. The article concludes with recommendations posed in the form of questions intended to inspire creative conceptualizations of how intersectional care ethics might become manifest within art therapy organizations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts in Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts in Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197455624000509\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197455624000509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了作为包容性、反压迫性组织结构和实践框架的交叉护理伦理。简短的文献综述记录了艺术治疗领域对政治参与和植根于社会正义的理论和实践的日益增长的需求。文中讨论了分析一个组织是否符合正义与公平的两个框架:交叉性理论和关怀伦理。文章还描述了创建和维护公正、公平和道德组织的障碍,并举例说明了这些障碍是如何在一个专业协会中形成的。文章最后以问题的形式提出了一些建议,旨在启发人们创造性地构思如何在艺术治疗组织中体现交叉性护理伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intersectional care ethics in art therapy organizations

This article presents intersectional care ethics as a framework for inclusive, anti-oppressive organizational structures and practices. A brief literature review documents the increasing demand in the art therapy field for theory and practice that is politically engaged and rooted in social justice. Two frameworks for analyzing an organization’s alignment with justice and equity are discussed: intersectionality theory and care ethics. Barriers to creating and maintaining just, equitable, and ethical organizations are also described, and examples are provided for how these barriers have been enacted in one professional association. The article concludes with recommendations posed in the form of questions intended to inspire creative conceptualizations of how intersectional care ethics might become manifest within art therapy organizations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Arts in Psychotherapy is a dynamic, contemporary journal publishing evidence-based research, expert opinion, theoretical positions, and case material on a wide range of topics intersecting the fields of mental health and creative arts therapies. It is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing 5 issues annually. Papers are welcomed from researchers and practitioners in the fields of art, dance/movement, drama, music, and poetry psychotherapy, as well as expressive and creative arts therapy, neuroscience, psychiatry, education, allied health, and psychology that aim to engage high level theoretical concepts with the rigor of professional practice. The journal welcomes contributions that present new and emergent knowledge about the role of the arts in healthcare, and engage a critical discourse relevant to an international readership that can inform the development of new services and the refinement of existing policies and practices. There is no restriction on research methods and review papers are welcome. From time to time the journal publishes special issues on topics warranting a distinctive focus relevant to the stated goals and scope of the publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信