研究取消购房限制的政策结果:来自中国的准实验证据

Xinghua Zhao , Bing Han , Yiming Guan , Zheng Cheng , Yuexi Yang
{"title":"研究取消购房限制的政策结果:来自中国的准实验证据","authors":"Xinghua Zhao ,&nbsp;Bing Han ,&nbsp;Yiming Guan ,&nbsp;Zheng Cheng ,&nbsp;Yuexi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While the impact of the house purchase restriction (HPR) policy on the housing market in China has been deeply examined, there is still little known about how the housing market varies when such policy is abandoned. To fill this gap, we first theoretically propose two hypotheses concerning the relationship between abandoning HPR policy and housing price and transaction based on the housing literature. We then examine the hypotheses by taking Jinan, China as empirical case that offer an excellent policy setting of some districts having discarded the policy while the other remains. The results derived from Synthetic Control Method (SCM) showed that the cancellation of the HPR policy plays a vital role in increasing the transaction volume, but it fails to promote house prices. The findings remain reliable after a series of placebo and robustness tests. This article adds new insight to the debate on efficacy of government intervention via more granular quantitative data, and further contributes to policy implications regarding housing market development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000184/pdfft?md5=aa4aaae18604f239f3467ae84106741b&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328624000184-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the policy outcomes of cancelling the house purchase restriction: quasi-experimental evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Xinghua Zhao ,&nbsp;Bing Han ,&nbsp;Yiming Guan ,&nbsp;Zheng Cheng ,&nbsp;Yuexi Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ugj.2024.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While the impact of the house purchase restriction (HPR) policy on the housing market in China has been deeply examined, there is still little known about how the housing market varies when such policy is abandoned. To fill this gap, we first theoretically propose two hypotheses concerning the relationship between abandoning HPR policy and housing price and transaction based on the housing literature. We then examine the hypotheses by taking Jinan, China as empirical case that offer an excellent policy setting of some districts having discarded the policy while the other remains. The results derived from Synthetic Control Method (SCM) showed that the cancellation of the HPR policy plays a vital role in increasing the transaction volume, but it fails to promote house prices. The findings remain reliable after a series of placebo and robustness tests. This article adds new insight to the debate on efficacy of government intervention via more granular quantitative data, and further contributes to policy implications regarding housing market development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Governance\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 122-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000184/pdfft?md5=aa4aaae18604f239f3467ae84106741b&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328624000184-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管住房限购政策对中国住房市场的影响已经得到了深入研究,但人们对放弃住房限购政策后住房市场的变化仍然知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们首先根据住房文献,从理论上提出了两个关于放弃住房限购政策与住房价格和交易之间关系的假设。然后,我们以中国济南为实证案例,对假设进行检验,济南提供了一个很好的政策环境,即一些地区放弃了该政策,而另一些地区则保留了该政策。合成控制法(SCM)得出的结果表明,取消 HPR 政策对增加交易量起到了重要作用,但却未能促进房价上涨。经过一系列安慰剂测试和稳健性测试后,研究结果依然可靠。本文通过更细化的定量数据,为有关政府干预效果的讨论增添了新的见解,并进一步为有关住房市场发展的政策含义做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the policy outcomes of cancelling the house purchase restriction: quasi-experimental evidence from China

While the impact of the house purchase restriction (HPR) policy on the housing market in China has been deeply examined, there is still little known about how the housing market varies when such policy is abandoned. To fill this gap, we first theoretically propose two hypotheses concerning the relationship between abandoning HPR policy and housing price and transaction based on the housing literature. We then examine the hypotheses by taking Jinan, China as empirical case that offer an excellent policy setting of some districts having discarded the policy while the other remains. The results derived from Synthetic Control Method (SCM) showed that the cancellation of the HPR policy plays a vital role in increasing the transaction volume, but it fails to promote house prices. The findings remain reliable after a series of placebo and robustness tests. This article adds new insight to the debate on efficacy of government intervention via more granular quantitative data, and further contributes to policy implications regarding housing market development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信