{"title":"伊朗延期献血者的回返率。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>The process of selecting blood donors is crucial for keeping the health of donors and ensuring the safety of the blood supply. However, it may create unpleasant feeling in those who are deferred. In this study, we aim to explore the return rates of Iranian deferred donors in comparison with eligible donors.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included all whole blood donors referred between March 2017 and March 2018, who experienced temporary deferral for any reason. Donors who successfully donated blood during this period were also part of the study. Participants were followed up until their next donation attempt, spanning 4.8 years after initial inclusion. Then odds of return and median return time for both deferred and eligible donors were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 993,824 volunteers, 733,153 (73.77%) were eligible and 192,332 (19.35%) temporary deferred. The return rate in the eligible and deferred donors was 74.77% vs. 51.77%, respectively (OR:2.78; 99%CI: 2.71–2.81). Odds of return among deferred regular (OR = 7.02, 99%CI:6.64–7.42), men (OR: 2.57, 99%CI:2.45–2.69), and over 45 years (OR: 1.15, 99% CI: 1.09–1.20), was higher than first-time, women, and younger donors. The median return time for eligible and deferred donors was 315 (99%CI: 313–316) and 1,467(99%CI: 1,412–1,524) days, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed the negative effect of deferral on the return rate, that led to a 23% reduction in the return of deferred donors. Avoiding unnecessary deferral through adherence to the standard operating procedure of donor selection and effective counselling which clarifies the purpose of deferral and encourages them to return after the deferral period ends are recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23262,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The return rate of deferred blood donors in Iran\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>The process of selecting blood donors is crucial for keeping the health of donors and ensuring the safety of the blood supply. However, it may create unpleasant feeling in those who are deferred. In this study, we aim to explore the return rates of Iranian deferred donors in comparison with eligible donors.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included all whole blood donors referred between March 2017 and March 2018, who experienced temporary deferral for any reason. Donors who successfully donated blood during this period were also part of the study. Participants were followed up until their next donation attempt, spanning 4.8 years after initial inclusion. Then odds of return and median return time for both deferred and eligible donors were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 993,824 volunteers, 733,153 (73.77%) were eligible and 192,332 (19.35%) temporary deferred. The return rate in the eligible and deferred donors was 74.77% vs. 51.77%, respectively (OR:2.78; 99%CI: 2.71–2.81). Odds of return among deferred regular (OR = 7.02, 99%CI:6.64–7.42), men (OR: 2.57, 99%CI:2.45–2.69), and over 45 years (OR: 1.15, 99% CI: 1.09–1.20), was higher than first-time, women, and younger donors. The median return time for eligible and deferred donors was 315 (99%CI: 313–316) and 1,467(99%CI: 1,412–1,524) days, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed the negative effect of deferral on the return rate, that led to a 23% reduction in the return of deferred donors. Avoiding unnecessary deferral through adherence to the standard operating procedure of donor selection and effective counselling which clarifies the purpose of deferral and encourages them to return after the deferral period ends are recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 135-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246782024000569\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246782024000569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The process of selecting blood donors is crucial for keeping the health of donors and ensuring the safety of the blood supply. However, it may create unpleasant feeling in those who are deferred. In this study, we aim to explore the return rates of Iranian deferred donors in comparison with eligible donors.
Materials and methods
The study included all whole blood donors referred between March 2017 and March 2018, who experienced temporary deferral for any reason. Donors who successfully donated blood during this period were also part of the study. Participants were followed up until their next donation attempt, spanning 4.8 years after initial inclusion. Then odds of return and median return time for both deferred and eligible donors were calculated.
Results
From 993,824 volunteers, 733,153 (73.77%) were eligible and 192,332 (19.35%) temporary deferred. The return rate in the eligible and deferred donors was 74.77% vs. 51.77%, respectively (OR:2.78; 99%CI: 2.71–2.81). Odds of return among deferred regular (OR = 7.02, 99%CI:6.64–7.42), men (OR: 2.57, 99%CI:2.45–2.69), and over 45 years (OR: 1.15, 99% CI: 1.09–1.20), was higher than first-time, women, and younger donors. The median return time for eligible and deferred donors was 315 (99%CI: 313–316) and 1,467(99%CI: 1,412–1,524) days, respectively.
Conclusion
This study revealed the negative effect of deferral on the return rate, that led to a 23% reduction in the return of deferred donors. Avoiding unnecessary deferral through adherence to the standard operating procedure of donor selection and effective counselling which clarifies the purpose of deferral and encourages them to return after the deferral period ends are recommended.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, the official journal of the French Society of Blood Transfusion (SFTS):
- an aid to training, at a European level
- the only French journal indexed in the hematology and immunology sections of Current Contents
Transfusion Clinique et Biologique spans fundamental research and everyday practice, with articles coming from both sides. Articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor and editorials are published in 4 editions a year, in French or in English, covering all scientific and medical aspects of transfusion: immunology, hematology, infectious diseases, genetics, molecular biology, etc. And finally, a convivial cross-disciplinary section on training and information offers practical updates.
Readership:
"Transfusers" are many and various: anesthetists, biologists, hematologists, and blood-bank, ICU and mobile emergency specialists...