与 ANCA 阳性相关的间质性肺病:与具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎不同的疾病谱

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Wenyan Zhu , Chunsheng Zhou , Xin Sun , Peijun Xue , Zongru Li , Weihong Zhang , Jiuliang Zhao , Ting Zhang , Min Peng , Juhong Shi , Chen Wang
{"title":"与 ANCA 阳性相关的间质性肺病:与具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎不同的疾病谱","authors":"Wenyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Chunsheng Zhou ,&nbsp;Xin Sun ,&nbsp;Peijun Xue ,&nbsp;Zongru Li ,&nbsp;Weihong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiuliang Zhao ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Peng ,&nbsp;Juhong Shi ,&nbsp;Chen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) is a type of autoantibodies associated with vasculitis. ANCA positivity is commonly observed in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. 7%-10% of ANCA-positive ILD patients don't present any symptoms of systemic vasculitis and are termed ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (ANCA-IIP). Some researchers propose that ANCA-IIP should be categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), although the official ATS/ERS statements exclude ANCA-IIP from this classification. Whether ANCA-IIP should be categorized into the entity of IPAF is still debatable.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with ANCA-IIP and those with IPAF were analyzed in a retrospective study of ILD. The clinical outcomes were determined through pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after a one-year follow-up, as well as assessing all-cause mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>27 patients with ANCA-IIP and 143 patients with IPAF were analyzed from a cohort of 995 patients with ILD. Patients in the ANCA-IIP group had an older age and a high proportion of males compared to those in the IPAF group. PFT results at baseline were similar between the two groups, except for a better FEV1% in the ANCA-IIP group. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy improved pulmonary function in patients with IPAF, but it continued to deteriorate after one year of treatment in the ANCA-IIP group. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ANCA-IIP group than in the IPAF group (22.2% vs. 6.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.017).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The responses to glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy differ between the ANCA-IIP and IPAF groups, leading to divergent prognoses. Therefore, it is inappropriate to classify ANCA-IIP as part of IPAF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interstitial lung diseases associated with ANCA positivity: A different disease spectrum from interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features\",\"authors\":\"Wenyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Chunsheng Zhou ,&nbsp;Xin Sun ,&nbsp;Peijun Xue ,&nbsp;Zongru Li ,&nbsp;Weihong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiuliang Zhao ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Peng ,&nbsp;Juhong Shi ,&nbsp;Chen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) is a type of autoantibodies associated with vasculitis. ANCA positivity is commonly observed in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. 7%-10% of ANCA-positive ILD patients don't present any symptoms of systemic vasculitis and are termed ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (ANCA-IIP). Some researchers propose that ANCA-IIP should be categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), although the official ATS/ERS statements exclude ANCA-IIP from this classification. Whether ANCA-IIP should be categorized into the entity of IPAF is still debatable.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients diagnosed with ANCA-IIP and those with IPAF were analyzed in a retrospective study of ILD. The clinical outcomes were determined through pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after a one-year follow-up, as well as assessing all-cause mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>27 patients with ANCA-IIP and 143 patients with IPAF were analyzed from a cohort of 995 patients with ILD. Patients in the ANCA-IIP group had an older age and a high proportion of males compared to those in the IPAF group. PFT results at baseline were similar between the two groups, except for a better FEV1% in the ANCA-IIP group. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy improved pulmonary function in patients with IPAF, but it continued to deteriorate after one year of treatment in the ANCA-IIP group. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ANCA-IIP group than in the IPAF group (22.2% vs. 6.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.017).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The responses to glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy differ between the ANCA-IIP and IPAF groups, leading to divergent prognoses. Therefore, it is inappropriate to classify ANCA-IIP as part of IPAF.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Medicine and Research\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Medicine and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041224000278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041224000278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)是一种与血管炎相关的自身抗体。ANCA阳性常见于间质性肺病(ILD)患者。7%-10%的ANCA阳性ILD患者没有任何全身性血管炎的症状,被称为ANCA阳性特发性间质性肺炎(ANCA-IIP)。一些研究人员建议将 ANCA-IIP 归类为具有自身免疫特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF),尽管 ATS/ERS 的官方声明将 ANCA-IIP 排除在这一分类之外。在一项关于 ILD 的回顾性研究中,对确诊为 ANCA-IIP 和 IPAF 的患者进行了分析。结果分析了995名ILD患者中的27名ANCA-IIP患者和143名IPAF患者。与IPAF组患者相比,ANCA-IIP组患者年龄较大,男性比例较高。除了ANCA-IIP组患者的FEV1%更高外,两组患者基线时的PFT结果相似。糖皮质激素和免疫抑制剂治疗改善了IPAF患者的肺功能,但ANCA-IIP组患者的肺功能在治疗一年后继续恶化。此外,ANCA-IIP 组的全因死亡率明显高于 IPAF 组(22.2% vs. 6.3%,P = 0.017)。因此,将 ANCA-IIP 归为 IPAF 的一部分是不恰当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interstitial lung diseases associated with ANCA positivity: A different disease spectrum from interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features

Background

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) is a type of autoantibodies associated with vasculitis. ANCA positivity is commonly observed in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. 7%-10% of ANCA-positive ILD patients don't present any symptoms of systemic vasculitis and are termed ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (ANCA-IIP). Some researchers propose that ANCA-IIP should be categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), although the official ATS/ERS statements exclude ANCA-IIP from this classification. Whether ANCA-IIP should be categorized into the entity of IPAF is still debatable.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with ANCA-IIP and those with IPAF were analyzed in a retrospective study of ILD. The clinical outcomes were determined through pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after a one-year follow-up, as well as assessing all-cause mortality.

Results

27 patients with ANCA-IIP and 143 patients with IPAF were analyzed from a cohort of 995 patients with ILD. Patients in the ANCA-IIP group had an older age and a high proportion of males compared to those in the IPAF group. PFT results at baseline were similar between the two groups, except for a better FEV1% in the ANCA-IIP group. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy improved pulmonary function in patients with IPAF, but it continued to deteriorate after one year of treatment in the ANCA-IIP group. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ANCA-IIP group than in the IPAF group (22.2% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.017).

Conclusion

The responses to glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy differ between the ANCA-IIP and IPAF groups, leading to divergent prognoses. Therefore, it is inappropriate to classify ANCA-IIP as part of IPAF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信