经颅电刺激在临床相关强度下调节发射率

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Forouzan Farahani , Niranjan Khadka , Lucas C. Parra , Marom Bikson , Mihály Vöröslakos
{"title":"经颅电刺激在临床相关强度下调节发射率","authors":"Forouzan Farahani ,&nbsp;Niranjan Khadka ,&nbsp;Lucas C. Parra ,&nbsp;Marom Bikson ,&nbsp;Mihály Vöröslakos","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Current flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Electric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25–0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2–18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 561-571"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000652/pdfft?md5=8e6a4059e976008e9e020a797aca6b86&pid=1-s2.0-S1935861X24000652-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities\",\"authors\":\"Forouzan Farahani ,&nbsp;Niranjan Khadka ,&nbsp;Lucas C. Parra ,&nbsp;Marom Bikson ,&nbsp;Mihály Vöröslakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brs.2024.04.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Current flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Electric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25–0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2–18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 561-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000652/pdfft?md5=8e6a4059e976008e9e020a797aca6b86&pid=1-s2.0-S1935861X24000652-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000652\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000652","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管低强度经颅电刺激(transcranial electrical stimulation,tES)取得了进展,但临床实际电场对神经元功能的疗效仍存在疑问。方法根据运动皮层(n = 2 只麻醉大鼠)和海马的电场测量结果校准电流模型。Neuropixels 2.0探针有384个通道,用于体内大鼠tES模型(n = 4只自由活动大鼠和2只氨基甲酸乙酯麻醉大鼠),以检测微弱电场对神经元发射率的影响。结果低至 0.35 V/m(0.25-0.47)的电场可急性调节海马的平均发射率。在这些强度下,发射率效应随电场强度以每 V/m 11.5 %(7.2-18.3)的速率单调增加。对于大多数兴奋性神经元来说,体节去极化刺激会增加点燃,而体节过极化刺激则会减少点燃。结论在清醒的动物中,电场对尖峰率的调节超过了之前在体外观察到的水平。射频效应可能是由锥体神经元的体极化介导的。我们建议今后所有的啮齿动物实验都直接测量电场,以确保实验的严谨性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities

Background

Notwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function.

Objective

To measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow.

Methods

Current flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents).

Results

Electric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25–0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2–18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive.

Conclusion

In awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
256
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation. Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信