产生低诱发力的神经肌肉电刺激对肘关节屈肌的肌肉损伤标志物产生反复阵痛效应

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sunggun Jeon , Stephanie A. Sontag , Lyric D. Richardson , Alex A. Olmos , Michael A. Trevino
{"title":"产生低诱发力的神经肌肉电刺激对肘关节屈肌的肌肉损伤标志物产生反复阵痛效应","authors":"Sunggun Jeon ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Sontag ,&nbsp;Lyric D. Richardson ,&nbsp;Alex A. Olmos ,&nbsp;Michael A. Trevino","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the repeated bout effect (RBE) on muscle damage markers following two bouts of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in untrained individuals. Following familiarization, participants received 45 consecutive NMES to the biceps brachii at an intensity that produced low evoked force for the elbow flexors. Muscle damage markers (maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC], elbow range of motion [ROM], muscle soreness via visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, pressure pain threshold [PPT], and muscle thickness) were measured before (PRE), after (POST), 1 day after (24 POST), and 2 days after (48 POST) NMES. Following 1 week of rest, procedures were replicated. Separate repeated measures two-way ANOVAs examined each measure. There were no interactions or bout main effects for MVIC or ROM. Time main effects indicated PRE MVIC was greater than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.002) and 24-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.024), and PRE ROM was greater than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.036). There was no interaction for muscle thickness. Respective time and bout main effects indicated muscle thickness at PRE was less than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.017), and second-bout muscle thickness (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.050) was less compared to the initial-bout. For PPT, there was an interaction (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.019). Initial-bout PRE PPT was less than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.033). Initial-bout 48-POST PPT was less than second-bout 48-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.037). There was a significant interaction for VAS (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.009). Initial-bout PRE VAS was less than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.033) and 24-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.015). Initial-bout POST and 24-POST VAS were greater than second-bout POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.023) and 24-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.006), respectively. The results support RBE on muscle damage markers related to inflammation, but not MVIC and ROM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular electrical stimulation producing low evoked force elicits the repeated bout effect on muscle damage markers of the elbow flexors\",\"authors\":\"Sunggun Jeon ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Sontag ,&nbsp;Lyric D. Richardson ,&nbsp;Alex A. Olmos ,&nbsp;Michael A. Trevino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examined the repeated bout effect (RBE) on muscle damage markers following two bouts of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in untrained individuals. Following familiarization, participants received 45 consecutive NMES to the biceps brachii at an intensity that produced low evoked force for the elbow flexors. Muscle damage markers (maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC], elbow range of motion [ROM], muscle soreness via visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, pressure pain threshold [PPT], and muscle thickness) were measured before (PRE), after (POST), 1 day after (24 POST), and 2 days after (48 POST) NMES. Following 1 week of rest, procedures were replicated. Separate repeated measures two-way ANOVAs examined each measure. There were no interactions or bout main effects for MVIC or ROM. Time main effects indicated PRE MVIC was greater than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.002) and 24-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.024), and PRE ROM was greater than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.036). There was no interaction for muscle thickness. Respective time and bout main effects indicated muscle thickness at PRE was less than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.017), and second-bout muscle thickness (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.050) was less compared to the initial-bout. For PPT, there was an interaction (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.019). Initial-bout PRE PPT was less than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.033). Initial-bout 48-POST PPT was less than second-bout 48-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.037). There was a significant interaction for VAS (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.009). Initial-bout PRE VAS was less than POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.033) and 24-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.015). Initial-bout POST and 24-POST VAS were greater than second-bout POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.023) and 24-POST (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.006), respectively. The results support RBE on muscle damage markers related to inflammation, but not MVIC and ROM.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 124-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究检测了未经训练的个体在两次神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)后肌肉损伤标志物的重复回合效应(RBE)。熟悉后,参与者接受45次连续的肱二头肌NMES,强度对肘关节屈肌产生低诱发力。肌肉损伤标志物(最大自主等距收缩[MVIC],肘关节活动范围[ROM],通过视觉模拟量表[VAS]评分的肌肉酸痛,压痛阈值[PPT]和肌肉厚度)在NMES之前(PRE),之后(POST), 1天后(24 POST)和2天后(48 POST)进行测量。休息1周后,重复上述步骤。单独的重复测量,双向方差分析检查每个测量。MVIC和ROM的主效应没有相互作用,时间主效应显示PRE - MVIC大于POST (p = 0.002)和24-POST (p = 0.024), PRE - ROM大于POST (p = 0.036)。肌肉厚度没有相互作用。分别在时间和回合的主要效应中,PRE的肌肉厚度小于POST (p = 0.017),而第二回合的肌肉厚度小于初始回合(p = 0.050)。PPT存在交互作用(p = 0.019)。PRE -约比PPT小于POST (p = 0.033)。48-POST首回合的PPT小于48-POST第二回合(p = 0.037)。VAS有显著交互作用(p = 0.009)。初始回合PRE VAS低于POST (p = 0.033)和24-POST (p = 0.015)。第一次POST和24次POST VAS评分分别高于第二次POST (p = 0.023)和24次POST (p = 0.006)。结果支持RBE对与炎症相关的肌肉损伤标志物,但不支持MVIC和ROM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation producing low evoked force elicits the repeated bout effect on muscle damage markers of the elbow flexors
This study examined the repeated bout effect (RBE) on muscle damage markers following two bouts of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in untrained individuals. Following familiarization, participants received 45 consecutive NMES to the biceps brachii at an intensity that produced low evoked force for the elbow flexors. Muscle damage markers (maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC], elbow range of motion [ROM], muscle soreness via visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, pressure pain threshold [PPT], and muscle thickness) were measured before (PRE), after (POST), 1 day after (24 POST), and 2 days after (48 POST) NMES. Following 1 week of rest, procedures were replicated. Separate repeated measures two-way ANOVAs examined each measure. There were no interactions or bout main effects for MVIC or ROM. Time main effects indicated PRE MVIC was greater than POST (p ​= ​0.002) and 24-POST (p ​= ​0.024), and PRE ROM was greater than POST (p ​= ​0.036). There was no interaction for muscle thickness. Respective time and bout main effects indicated muscle thickness at PRE was less than POST (p ​= ​0.017), and second-bout muscle thickness (p ​= ​0.050) was less compared to the initial-bout. For PPT, there was an interaction (p ​= ​0.019). Initial-bout PRE PPT was less than POST (p ​= ​0.033). Initial-bout 48-POST PPT was less than second-bout 48-POST (p ​= ​0.037). There was a significant interaction for VAS (p ​= ​0.009). Initial-bout PRE VAS was less than POST (p ​= ​0.033) and 24-POST (p ​= ​0.015). Initial-bout POST and 24-POST VAS were greater than second-bout POST (p ​= ​0.023) and 24-POST (p ​= ​0.006), respectively. The results support RBE on muscle damage markers related to inflammation, but not MVIC and ROM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信