袖带胃切除术与胃旁路术减肥手术后妊娠结局的比较

IF 1.5 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marie-Anne Joly , Violaine Peyronnet , Muriel Coupaye , Séverine Ledoux , Nicolas Pourtier , Lucile Pencole , Laurent Mandelbrot
{"title":"袖带胃切除术与胃旁路术减肥手术后妊娠结局的比较","authors":"Marie-Anne Joly ,&nbsp;Violaine Peyronnet ,&nbsp;Muriel Coupaye ,&nbsp;Séverine Ledoux ,&nbsp;Nicolas Pourtier ,&nbsp;Lucile Pencole ,&nbsp;Laurent Mandelbrot","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Bariatric surgery has an impact on subsequent pregnancies, in particular an association between gastric bypass and small for gestational age. Knowledge is lacking on whether sleeve gastrectomy is associated with more favorable pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to compare the impact of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA), and of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study in a single reference center, including all patients with a history of sleeve or bypass who delivered between 2004 and 2021 after their first pregnancy following bariatric surgery. We compared the incidence of SGA, intrauterine growth retardation, preterm delivery and adverse maternal outcomes between patients who had sleeve versus bypass.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 244 patients, 145 had a sleeve and 99 had a bypass. The proportion of SGA &lt; 10th percentile did not differ between the two groups (38/145 (26.2 %) vs 22/99 (22.22 %), respectively, p = 0.48). Preterm birth &lt; 37 WG was lower in the sleeve group (5/145 (3.45%) vs 12/99 (12.12 %) in the bypass group (p = 0.01), as well as NICU hospitalizations (3 (2.07%) vs 12/99 (12.12%), p &lt; 0.01). There was no difference regarding adverse maternal outcomes such as gestational diabetes and hypertensive complications. The proportion of SGA was not lower in patients with bypass when adjusting for other risk factors (BMI, smoking, geographic origin, diabetes and hypertension) (aOR 0.70; 95%CI 0.01 – 2.85).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>sleeve was associated with an incidence of SGA which was as high as after bypass, however the incidence of preterm birth was lower.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000292/pdfft?md5=940dd5fdbd5b6c16c1699ac80b68884e&pid=1-s2.0-S2590161324000292-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after bariatric surgery by sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Anne Joly ,&nbsp;Violaine Peyronnet ,&nbsp;Muriel Coupaye ,&nbsp;Séverine Ledoux ,&nbsp;Nicolas Pourtier ,&nbsp;Lucile Pencole ,&nbsp;Laurent Mandelbrot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Bariatric surgery has an impact on subsequent pregnancies, in particular an association between gastric bypass and small for gestational age. Knowledge is lacking on whether sleeve gastrectomy is associated with more favorable pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to compare the impact of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA), and of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study in a single reference center, including all patients with a history of sleeve or bypass who delivered between 2004 and 2021 after their first pregnancy following bariatric surgery. We compared the incidence of SGA, intrauterine growth retardation, preterm delivery and adverse maternal outcomes between patients who had sleeve versus bypass.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 244 patients, 145 had a sleeve and 99 had a bypass. The proportion of SGA &lt; 10th percentile did not differ between the two groups (38/145 (26.2 %) vs 22/99 (22.22 %), respectively, p = 0.48). Preterm birth &lt; 37 WG was lower in the sleeve group (5/145 (3.45%) vs 12/99 (12.12 %) in the bypass group (p = 0.01), as well as NICU hospitalizations (3 (2.07%) vs 12/99 (12.12%), p &lt; 0.01). There was no difference regarding adverse maternal outcomes such as gestational diabetes and hypertensive complications. The proportion of SGA was not lower in patients with bypass when adjusting for other risk factors (BMI, smoking, geographic origin, diabetes and hypertension) (aOR 0.70; 95%CI 0.01 – 2.85).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>sleeve was associated with an incidence of SGA which was as high as after bypass, however the incidence of preterm birth was lower.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000292/pdfft?md5=940dd5fdbd5b6c16c1699ac80b68884e&pid=1-s2.0-S2590161324000292-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减肥手术对妊娠有影响,尤其是胃旁路手术与胎龄小之间的关系。袖带胃切除术是否与更有利的妊娠结局相关,目前还缺乏相关知识。本研究旨在比较袖带胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对小于妊娠年龄(SGA)发生率和不良妊娠结局的影响。研究设计我们在一个参考中心进行了一项回顾性研究,包括所有在2004年至2021年期间接受过袖带胃切除术或胃旁路术,并在减肥手术后首次妊娠分娩的患者。我们比较了套扎术和分流术患者的 SGA、宫内发育迟缓、早产和不良孕产结局的发生率。结果在 244 名患者中,145 人进行了套扎术,99 人进行了分流术。两组 SGA < 10 百分位数的比例没有差异(分别为 38/145 (26.2 %) vs 22/99 (22.22 %),p = 0.48)。套管组的早产率< 37 WG(5/145(3.45%) vs 12/99(12.12%))和新生儿重症监护室住院率(3(2.07%) vs 12/99(12.12%),p< 0.01)均低于旁路组(p = 0.01)。在妊娠糖尿病和高血压并发症等不良孕产结果方面没有差异。在调整了其他风险因素(体重指数、吸烟、地域、糖尿病和高血压)后,分流术患者的 SGA 比例并没有降低(aOR 0.70;95%CI 0.01 - 2.85)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after bariatric surgery by sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass

Objective

Bariatric surgery has an impact on subsequent pregnancies, in particular an association between gastric bypass and small for gestational age. Knowledge is lacking on whether sleeve gastrectomy is associated with more favorable pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to compare the impact of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA), and of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective study in a single reference center, including all patients with a history of sleeve or bypass who delivered between 2004 and 2021 after their first pregnancy following bariatric surgery. We compared the incidence of SGA, intrauterine growth retardation, preterm delivery and adverse maternal outcomes between patients who had sleeve versus bypass.

Results

Of 244 patients, 145 had a sleeve and 99 had a bypass. The proportion of SGA < 10th percentile did not differ between the two groups (38/145 (26.2 %) vs 22/99 (22.22 %), respectively, p = 0.48). Preterm birth < 37 WG was lower in the sleeve group (5/145 (3.45%) vs 12/99 (12.12 %) in the bypass group (p = 0.01), as well as NICU hospitalizations (3 (2.07%) vs 12/99 (12.12%), p < 0.01). There was no difference regarding adverse maternal outcomes such as gestational diabetes and hypertensive complications. The proportion of SGA was not lower in patients with bypass when adjusting for other risk factors (BMI, smoking, geographic origin, diabetes and hypertension) (aOR 0.70; 95%CI 0.01 – 2.85).

Conclusion

sleeve was associated with an incidence of SGA which was as high as after bypass, however the incidence of preterm birth was lower.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信