梗阻性输尿管结石患者穹窿破裂的预测因素: 多中心数据分析

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_57_23
Y. Ghazwani, S. B. Hamri, Khalid A. Alrabeeah, A. Alkhayal, B. Alsaikhan, T. A. Alferayan, Omar B. Alfraidi, F. Balaraj, Mohammad Alghafees, Abdullah A Al Qurashi, Yasser A. Noureldin
{"title":"梗阻性输尿管结石患者穹窿破裂的预测因素: 多中心数据分析","authors":"Y. Ghazwani, S. B. Hamri, Khalid A. Alrabeeah, A. Alkhayal, B. Alsaikhan, T. A. Alferayan, Omar B. Alfraidi, F. Balaraj, Mohammad Alghafees, Abdullah A Al Qurashi, Yasser A. Noureldin","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_57_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Renal forniceal rupture (FR) is a unique complication of obstructive uropathy. This study aimed to identify the predictors of FR among patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteral calculi.\n \n \n \n After obtaining ethics approval, electronic records of patients from three National Guard hospitals in Saudi Arabia were reviewed between 2016 and 2020 to identify patients who presented with renal colic and were diagnosed with FR due to obstructive ureteric stones (FR group). An equivalent number of consecutive patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteric stones without FR was selected as a control group (non-FR group). Patients were grouped according to age group (<30, 30–40, 41–50, and >50 years), body mass index (BMI) class, gender, comorbidities, grade of hydronephrosis, location of the stone in the ureter, size of the stone (<3 mm, 3–7 mm, and >7 mm), and stone former status. Baseline patients’ and stone characteristics were compared, and a regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of FR.\n \n \n \n A total of 50 patients with FR were identified, and a control group of 50 patients without FR were selected. The baseline patients’ and stone demographic characteristics in terms of age (P = 0.42), gender (P = 0.275), BMI (P = 0.672), comorbidity, grade of hydronephrosis (P = 0.201), and stone location (P = 0.639) were comparable between the FR group and the non-FR group. However, the stone size was statistically significant between both groups (P = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, it was found that the stone size was associated with a significantly higher increase in the incidence of FR (odds ratio [OR]: 6.5 [1.235–34.434]; P = 0.027). Furthermore, the age group between 30 and 40 years was potentially at a lower risk for FR (OR: 0.262 [0.069–0.999]; P = 0.049).\n \n \n \n This multicenter study showed that the stone size 3–7 mm had a six-fold increase in the chance of FR, and the age group between 30 and 40 years is potentially at a lower risk for FR.\n","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of forniceal rupture in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi: Analysis of multicenter data\",\"authors\":\"Y. Ghazwani, S. B. Hamri, Khalid A. Alrabeeah, A. Alkhayal, B. Alsaikhan, T. A. Alferayan, Omar B. Alfraidi, F. Balaraj, Mohammad Alghafees, Abdullah A Al Qurashi, Yasser A. Noureldin\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ua.ua_57_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Renal forniceal rupture (FR) is a unique complication of obstructive uropathy. This study aimed to identify the predictors of FR among patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteral calculi.\\n \\n \\n \\n After obtaining ethics approval, electronic records of patients from three National Guard hospitals in Saudi Arabia were reviewed between 2016 and 2020 to identify patients who presented with renal colic and were diagnosed with FR due to obstructive ureteric stones (FR group). An equivalent number of consecutive patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteric stones without FR was selected as a control group (non-FR group). Patients were grouped according to age group (<30, 30–40, 41–50, and >50 years), body mass index (BMI) class, gender, comorbidities, grade of hydronephrosis, location of the stone in the ureter, size of the stone (<3 mm, 3–7 mm, and >7 mm), and stone former status. Baseline patients’ and stone characteristics were compared, and a regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of FR.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 50 patients with FR were identified, and a control group of 50 patients without FR were selected. The baseline patients’ and stone demographic characteristics in terms of age (P = 0.42), gender (P = 0.275), BMI (P = 0.672), comorbidity, grade of hydronephrosis (P = 0.201), and stone location (P = 0.639) were comparable between the FR group and the non-FR group. However, the stone size was statistically significant between both groups (P = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, it was found that the stone size was associated with a significantly higher increase in the incidence of FR (odds ratio [OR]: 6.5 [1.235–34.434]; P = 0.027). Furthermore, the age group between 30 and 40 years was potentially at a lower risk for FR (OR: 0.262 [0.069–0.999]; P = 0.049).\\n \\n \\n \\n This multicenter study showed that the stone size 3–7 mm had a six-fold increase in the chance of FR, and the age group between 30 and 40 years is potentially at a lower risk for FR.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":23633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Annals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_57_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_57_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾穹窿破裂(FR)是梗阻性尿病的一种独特并发症。本研究旨在确定因输尿管结石梗阻而出现肾绞痛的患者发生肾动脉破裂的预测因素。 在获得伦理批准后,研究人员查阅了沙特阿拉伯三家国民卫队医院 2016 年至 2020 年间的患者电子病历,以确定因梗阻性输尿管结石而出现肾绞痛并被诊断为 FR 的患者(FR 组)。此外,还选择了同等数量的因输尿管梗阻性结石导致肾绞痛但未患 FR 的连续患者作为对照组(非 FR 组)。根据年龄组(50 岁)、体重指数(BMI)等级、性别、合并症、肾积水等级、结石在输尿管中的位置、结石大小(7 毫米)和结石前状态对患者进行分组。对患者的基线特征和结石特征进行了比较,并进行了回归分析,以确定 FR 的预测因素。 该研究共确定了 50 名膀胱结石患者,并选择了 50 名没有膀胱结石的患者作为对照组。在年龄(P = 0.42)、性别(P = 0.275)、体重指数(BMI)(P = 0.672)、合并症、肾积水等级(P = 0.201)和结石位置(P = 0.639)等基线患者和结石人口统计学特征方面,FR 组与非 FR 组具有可比性。但是,两组之间的结石大小差异有统计学意义(P = 0.014)。多变量分析发现,结石大小与 FR 发病率的显著增加有关(几率比 [OR]:6.5 [1.235-34.434];P = 0.027)。此外,30 至 40 岁年龄组患 FR 的潜在风险较低(OR:0.262 [0.069-0.999];P = 0.049)。 这项多中心研究表明,3-7 毫米大小的结石发生急性肾功能衰竭的几率增加了六倍,而 30-40 岁年龄组发生急性肾功能衰竭的潜在风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of forniceal rupture in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi: Analysis of multicenter data
Renal forniceal rupture (FR) is a unique complication of obstructive uropathy. This study aimed to identify the predictors of FR among patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteral calculi. After obtaining ethics approval, electronic records of patients from three National Guard hospitals in Saudi Arabia were reviewed between 2016 and 2020 to identify patients who presented with renal colic and were diagnosed with FR due to obstructive ureteric stones (FR group). An equivalent number of consecutive patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteric stones without FR was selected as a control group (non-FR group). Patients were grouped according to age group (<30, 30–40, 41–50, and >50 years), body mass index (BMI) class, gender, comorbidities, grade of hydronephrosis, location of the stone in the ureter, size of the stone (<3 mm, 3–7 mm, and >7 mm), and stone former status. Baseline patients’ and stone characteristics were compared, and a regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of FR. A total of 50 patients with FR were identified, and a control group of 50 patients without FR were selected. The baseline patients’ and stone demographic characteristics in terms of age (P = 0.42), gender (P = 0.275), BMI (P = 0.672), comorbidity, grade of hydronephrosis (P = 0.201), and stone location (P = 0.639) were comparable between the FR group and the non-FR group. However, the stone size was statistically significant between both groups (P = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, it was found that the stone size was associated with a significantly higher increase in the incidence of FR (odds ratio [OR]: 6.5 [1.235–34.434]; P = 0.027). Furthermore, the age group between 30 and 40 years was potentially at a lower risk for FR (OR: 0.262 [0.069–0.999]; P = 0.049). This multicenter study showed that the stone size 3–7 mm had a six-fold increase in the chance of FR, and the age group between 30 and 40 years is potentially at a lower risk for FR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信