通过饲喂、饲养、营养、卫生和健康措施评估饲主对非洲白腰马(Atelerix albiventris)福利的投资情况

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Marijana Vučinić , Katarina Nenadović , Milan Došenović , Ana Pešić , Miloš Vučićević
{"title":"通过饲喂、饲养、营养、卫生和健康措施评估饲主对非洲白腰马(Atelerix albiventris)福利的投资情况","authors":"Marijana Vučinić ,&nbsp;Katarina Nenadović ,&nbsp;Milan Došenović ,&nbsp;Ana Pešić ,&nbsp;Miloš Vučićević","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents findings from an assessment of owners' investments in the welfare of African pygmy hedgehogs <em>(Atelerix albiventris)</em>, focusing on feeding, housing, enrichment, hygiene, and health practices. Participants were divided into three groups based on how they acquired information about hedgehog care: G1 consulted veterinarians, G2 consulted other owners and breeders, and G3 consulted the internet. Group G3 comprised the largest portion of participants (45%), while G1 had the fewest (22%). The majority of owners fed their hedgehogs commercial food (55%), supplemented with live worms, dry insects, or plants (79%). Most hedgehogs were housed in units smaller than 0.5 square meters (68%), and 84% lacked a hiding \"house\". Some owners did not provide a hedgehog wheel (17%). Owners consulting veterinarians (G1) were more likely to use commercial food (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), spend time interacting with their pets (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), wash the wheel daily (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), seek veterinary check-ups upon acquisition (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), schedule preventive examinations (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and consult veterinarians for health changes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared to internet consulters (G3). All G1 owners had hedgehog wheels, significantly more than G2 owners (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), where 27% lacked them. Significant differences existed between G1 and G2 in wheel washing frequency, post-acquisition veterinary visits (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), preventive check-ups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and contacting veterinarians for health changes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Overall, owners across all groups exhibited differences in care practices, including some errors such as inadequate housing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of owner investment in African pygmy hedgehog (Atelerix albiventris) welfare by feeding, housing, enrichment, hygiene, and health practice\",\"authors\":\"Marijana Vučinić ,&nbsp;Katarina Nenadović ,&nbsp;Milan Došenović ,&nbsp;Ana Pešić ,&nbsp;Miloš Vučićević\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jveb.2024.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article presents findings from an assessment of owners' investments in the welfare of African pygmy hedgehogs <em>(Atelerix albiventris)</em>, focusing on feeding, housing, enrichment, hygiene, and health practices. Participants were divided into three groups based on how they acquired information about hedgehog care: G1 consulted veterinarians, G2 consulted other owners and breeders, and G3 consulted the internet. Group G3 comprised the largest portion of participants (45%), while G1 had the fewest (22%). The majority of owners fed their hedgehogs commercial food (55%), supplemented with live worms, dry insects, or plants (79%). Most hedgehogs were housed in units smaller than 0.5 square meters (68%), and 84% lacked a hiding \\\"house\\\". Some owners did not provide a hedgehog wheel (17%). Owners consulting veterinarians (G1) were more likely to use commercial food (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), spend time interacting with their pets (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), wash the wheel daily (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), seek veterinary check-ups upon acquisition (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), schedule preventive examinations (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), and consult veterinarians for health changes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) compared to internet consulters (G3). All G1 owners had hedgehog wheels, significantly more than G2 owners (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), where 27% lacked them. Significant differences existed between G1 and G2 in wheel washing frequency, post-acquisition veterinary visits (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), preventive check-ups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and contacting veterinarians for health changes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Overall, owners across all groups exhibited differences in care practices, including some errors such as inadequate housing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787824000248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787824000248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了对饲养者在非洲侏儒刺猬(Atelerix albiventris)福利方面的投资进行评估的结果,重点关注饲养、居住、强化、卫生和健康实践。根据获取刺猬护理信息的方式,参与者被分为三组:G1 组咨询兽医,G2 组咨询其他主人和饲养者,G3 组咨询互联网。G3 组的参与者最多(45%),而 G1 组的参与者最少(22%)。大多数饲主给刺猬喂食商业食品(55%),辅以活虫、干昆虫或植物(79%)。大多数刺猬的饲养单位面积小于 0.5 平方米(68%),84% 的刺猬没有藏身的 "房子"。有些主人没有提供刺猬轮(17%)。与网络咨询者(G3)相比,向兽医咨询的主人(G1)更倾向于使用商业食品(P < 0.05)、花时间与宠物互动(P < 0.01)、每天清洗车轮(P < 0.01)、在获得刺猬后寻求兽医检查(P < 0.01)、安排预防性检查(P < 0.01)以及在健康发生变化时向兽医咨询(P < 0.01)。G1 的所有饲养者都有刺猬轮,明显多于 G2 的饲养者(P < 0.01),后者有 27% 的饲养者没有刺猬轮。G1 和 G2 在车轮清洗频率、购买后兽医上门服务(P <0.001)、预防性检查(P <0.001)和因健康变化联系兽医(P <0.01)方面存在显著差异。总体而言,所有组别的饲养者在护理方法上都存在差异,包括一些错误,如饲养不当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of owner investment in African pygmy hedgehog (Atelerix albiventris) welfare by feeding, housing, enrichment, hygiene, and health practice

This article presents findings from an assessment of owners' investments in the welfare of African pygmy hedgehogs (Atelerix albiventris), focusing on feeding, housing, enrichment, hygiene, and health practices. Participants were divided into three groups based on how they acquired information about hedgehog care: G1 consulted veterinarians, G2 consulted other owners and breeders, and G3 consulted the internet. Group G3 comprised the largest portion of participants (45%), while G1 had the fewest (22%). The majority of owners fed their hedgehogs commercial food (55%), supplemented with live worms, dry insects, or plants (79%). Most hedgehogs were housed in units smaller than 0.5 square meters (68%), and 84% lacked a hiding "house". Some owners did not provide a hedgehog wheel (17%). Owners consulting veterinarians (G1) were more likely to use commercial food (P < 0.05), spend time interacting with their pets (P < 0.01), wash the wheel daily (P < 0.01), seek veterinary check-ups upon acquisition (P < 0.01), schedule preventive examinations (P < 0.01), and consult veterinarians for health changes (P < 0.01) compared to internet consulters (G3). All G1 owners had hedgehog wheels, significantly more than G2 owners (P < 0.01), where 27% lacked them. Significant differences existed between G1 and G2 in wheel washing frequency, post-acquisition veterinary visits (P < 0.001), preventive check-ups (P < 0.001), and contacting veterinarians for health changes (P < 0.01). Overall, owners across all groups exhibited differences in care practices, including some errors such as inadequate housing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信