Eman H. Elbayoumi, Houssam Farres, Camilo A. Polania-Sandoval, Santh Prakash Lanka, Young Erben
{"title":"使用 TBE 装置进行复杂的 0 区主动脉弓修复术:病例报告和文献综述","authors":"Eman H. Elbayoumi, Houssam Farres, Camilo A. Polania-Sandoval, Santh Prakash Lanka, Young Erben","doi":"10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) is intended for the treatment of proximal descending aortic pathology with preservation of the left subclavian artery blood flow. For the treatment of more extensive pathologies comprising the aortic arch, current devices are limited. We present a case and literature review regarding use of TBE device in a proximal (Zone 0) aortic aneurysm repair.</p></div><div><h3>Case report</h3><p>A 59-year-old male patient with a history of ascending aortic open repair due to a type A dissection presented with an enlarging proximal descending aorta. Due to refusal for further open aortic surgical intervention, a two-staged hybrid repair was performed comprising extra-anatomic bypasses followed by zone 0 TBE repair. Complications related to surgical intervention; but, not to the aortic arch repair included anaphylactic reactions that required rescheduling of surgical procedure. Postoperative follow-up demonstrated a successful repair with patent stent grafts and bypasses.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>TBEs are part of the emerging technologies for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. This case highlights the use of the device in a patient with complex aortic dissection enlargement secondary to a previously emergent surgical management of a type A aortic dissection. The literature review highlights the emerging use of endovascular technologies and its pitfalls as the risk of stroke and endoleak in the short- and long-term are not insignificant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite its off-label use, TBEs can be effective and a feasible solution in patients who either refuse or do not qualify for open aortic surgical intervention. However, close follow-up is necessary, as short- and long-term studies suggest a significant rate of stroke and endoleaks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72235,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000370/pdfft?md5=bc49e2f7dbfa77940052f5397e77ceeb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772687824000370-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex zone 0 aortic arch repair using TBE device: Case report and literature review\",\"authors\":\"Eman H. Elbayoumi, Houssam Farres, Camilo A. Polania-Sandoval, Santh Prakash Lanka, Young Erben\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsurg.2024.100285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) is intended for the treatment of proximal descending aortic pathology with preservation of the left subclavian artery blood flow. For the treatment of more extensive pathologies comprising the aortic arch, current devices are limited. We present a case and literature review regarding use of TBE device in a proximal (Zone 0) aortic aneurysm repair.</p></div><div><h3>Case report</h3><p>A 59-year-old male patient with a history of ascending aortic open repair due to a type A dissection presented with an enlarging proximal descending aorta. Due to refusal for further open aortic surgical intervention, a two-staged hybrid repair was performed comprising extra-anatomic bypasses followed by zone 0 TBE repair. Complications related to surgical intervention; but, not to the aortic arch repair included anaphylactic reactions that required rescheduling of surgical procedure. Postoperative follow-up demonstrated a successful repair with patent stent grafts and bypasses.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>TBEs are part of the emerging technologies for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. This case highlights the use of the device in a patient with complex aortic dissection enlargement secondary to a previously emergent surgical management of a type A aortic dissection. The literature review highlights the emerging use of endovascular technologies and its pitfalls as the risk of stroke and endoleak in the short- and long-term are not insignificant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite its off-label use, TBEs can be effective and a feasible solution in patients who either refuse or do not qualify for open aortic surgical intervention. However, close follow-up is necessary, as short- and long-term studies suggest a significant rate of stroke and endoleaks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000370/pdfft?md5=bc49e2f7dbfa77940052f5397e77ceeb&pid=1-s2.0-S2772687824000370-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery. Brief reports and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772687824000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言胸支假体(TBE)用于治疗近端降主动脉病变,同时保留左锁骨下动脉血流。对于治疗主动脉弓更广泛的病变,目前的设备还很有限。病例报告一位 59 岁的男性患者因 A 型夹层而进行过升主动脉开放性修复术,并伴有近降主动脉扩大。由于拒绝进一步进行主动脉开放手术干预,患者接受了两阶段混合修复术,包括解剖外搭桥和 0 区 TBE 修复。与手术干预有关但与主动脉弓修复无关的并发症包括过敏反应,需要重新安排手术时间。术后随访显示,修复成功,支架移植物和旁路通畅。讨论TBE是治疗主动脉弓病变的新兴技术之一。本病例重点介绍了该装置在一名继发于 A 型主动脉夹层的复杂主动脉夹层扩大患者身上的应用。文献综述强调了血管内技术的新兴应用及其隐患,因为中风和内漏的风险在短期和长期内都不小。结论尽管在标签外使用,但对于拒绝或不符合开放性主动脉手术干预条件的患者来说,TBE 是有效和可行的解决方案。然而,由于短期和长期研究表明中风和内漏的发生率较高,因此有必要进行密切随访。
Complex zone 0 aortic arch repair using TBE device: Case report and literature review
Introduction
The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) is intended for the treatment of proximal descending aortic pathology with preservation of the left subclavian artery blood flow. For the treatment of more extensive pathologies comprising the aortic arch, current devices are limited. We present a case and literature review regarding use of TBE device in a proximal (Zone 0) aortic aneurysm repair.
Case report
A 59-year-old male patient with a history of ascending aortic open repair due to a type A dissection presented with an enlarging proximal descending aorta. Due to refusal for further open aortic surgical intervention, a two-staged hybrid repair was performed comprising extra-anatomic bypasses followed by zone 0 TBE repair. Complications related to surgical intervention; but, not to the aortic arch repair included anaphylactic reactions that required rescheduling of surgical procedure. Postoperative follow-up demonstrated a successful repair with patent stent grafts and bypasses.
Discussion
TBEs are part of the emerging technologies for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. This case highlights the use of the device in a patient with complex aortic dissection enlargement secondary to a previously emergent surgical management of a type A aortic dissection. The literature review highlights the emerging use of endovascular technologies and its pitfalls as the risk of stroke and endoleak in the short- and long-term are not insignificant.
Conclusion
Despite its off-label use, TBEs can be effective and a feasible solution in patients who either refuse or do not qualify for open aortic surgical intervention. However, close follow-up is necessary, as short- and long-term studies suggest a significant rate of stroke and endoleaks.