中高危弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤化疗后放疗的总生存期与无进展生存期的关系:系统综述与荟萃分析

IF 7.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
{"title":"中高危弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤化疗后放疗的总生存期与无进展生存期的关系:系统综述与荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether improved progression-free survival (PFS) from radiotherapy (RT) translates into an overall survival (OS) benefit for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies that compared combined-modality therapy (CMT) with chemotherapy (CT) alone. Weighted regression analyses were used to estimate the correlation between OS and PFS benefits. Cohen's kappa statistic assessed the consistency between DLBCL risk-models and PFS patterns. Furthermore, the benefit trend of RT was analyzed by fitting a linear regression model to the pooled hazard ratio (HR) according to the PFS patterns.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both 7 RCTs and 52 retrospective studies, correlations were found between PFS HR (HR<sub>PFS</sub>) and OS HR (HR<sub>OS</sub>) at trial level (<em>r</em> = 0.639–0.876), and between PFS and OS rates at treatment-arm level, regardless of CT regimens (<em>r</em> = 0.882–0.964). Incorporating RT into CT increased about 18% of PFS, and revealed a different OS benefit profile. Patients were stratified into four CT-generated PFS patterns (&gt;80%, &gt;60–80%, &gt;40–60%, and ≤40%), which was consistent with risk-stratified subgroups (kappa &gt; 0.6). Absolute gain in OS from RT ranged from ≤5% at PFS &gt;80% to about 21% at PFS ≤40%, with pooled HR<sub>OS</sub> from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.51–0.97) to 0.48 (95% CI, 0.36–0.63) after rituximab-based CT. The OS benefit of RT was predominant in intermediate- and high-risk patients with PFS ≤ 80%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We demonstrated a varied OS benefit profile of RT to inform treatment decisions and clinical trial design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 249-259"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000231/pdfft?md5=6ecbbe0e8123ee6ac7c34f77b7ccb7f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000231-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of overall survival benefit of radiotherapy with progression-free survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jncc.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether improved progression-free survival (PFS) from radiotherapy (RT) translates into an overall survival (OS) benefit for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies that compared combined-modality therapy (CMT) with chemotherapy (CT) alone. Weighted regression analyses were used to estimate the correlation between OS and PFS benefits. Cohen's kappa statistic assessed the consistency between DLBCL risk-models and PFS patterns. Furthermore, the benefit trend of RT was analyzed by fitting a linear regression model to the pooled hazard ratio (HR) according to the PFS patterns.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both 7 RCTs and 52 retrospective studies, correlations were found between PFS HR (HR<sub>PFS</sub>) and OS HR (HR<sub>OS</sub>) at trial level (<em>r</em> = 0.639–0.876), and between PFS and OS rates at treatment-arm level, regardless of CT regimens (<em>r</em> = 0.882–0.964). Incorporating RT into CT increased about 18% of PFS, and revealed a different OS benefit profile. Patients were stratified into four CT-generated PFS patterns (&gt;80%, &gt;60–80%, &gt;40–60%, and ≤40%), which was consistent with risk-stratified subgroups (kappa &gt; 0.6). Absolute gain in OS from RT ranged from ≤5% at PFS &gt;80% to about 21% at PFS ≤40%, with pooled HR<sub>OS</sub> from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.51–0.97) to 0.48 (95% CI, 0.36–0.63) after rituximab-based CT. The OS benefit of RT was predominant in intermediate- and high-risk patients with PFS ≤ 80%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We demonstrated a varied OS benefit profile of RT to inform treatment decisions and clinical trial design.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 249-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000231/pdfft?md5=6ecbbe0e8123ee6ac7c34f77b7ccb7f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2667005424000231-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Center\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667005424000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法通过系统性文献检索确定了比较联合模式疗法(CMT)与单纯化疗(CT)的随机对照试验(RCT)和回顾性研究。加权回归分析用于估计OS和PFS获益之间的相关性。Cohen's kappa 统计评估了 DLBCL 风险模型与 PFS 模式之间的一致性。结果在7项RCT研究和52项回顾性研究中,试验水平的PFS HR(HRPFS)和OS HR(HROS)之间存在相关性(r = 0.639-0.876),治疗组水平的PFS和OS率之间也存在相关性,与CT方案无关(r = 0.882-0.964)。在CT中加入RT可增加约18%的PFS,并显示出不同的OS获益情况。患者被分为四种CT生成的PFS模式(80%、60%-80%、40%-60%和≤40%),这与风险分层亚组一致(kappa >0.6)。RT带来的OS绝对收益从PFS >80%时的≤5%到PFS≤40%时的约21%不等,基于利妥昔单抗的CT后的汇总HROS从0.70(95% CI,0.51-0.97)到0.48(95% CI,0.36-0.63)不等。RT的OS获益主要体现在PFS≤80%的中危和高危患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of overall survival benefit of radiotherapy with progression-free survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate whether improved progression-free survival (PFS) from radiotherapy (RT) translates into an overall survival (OS) benefit for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods

A systematic literature search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies that compared combined-modality therapy (CMT) with chemotherapy (CT) alone. Weighted regression analyses were used to estimate the correlation between OS and PFS benefits. Cohen's kappa statistic assessed the consistency between DLBCL risk-models and PFS patterns. Furthermore, the benefit trend of RT was analyzed by fitting a linear regression model to the pooled hazard ratio (HR) according to the PFS patterns.

Results

For both 7 RCTs and 52 retrospective studies, correlations were found between PFS HR (HRPFS) and OS HR (HROS) at trial level (r = 0.639–0.876), and between PFS and OS rates at treatment-arm level, regardless of CT regimens (r = 0.882–0.964). Incorporating RT into CT increased about 18% of PFS, and revealed a different OS benefit profile. Patients were stratified into four CT-generated PFS patterns (>80%, >60–80%, >40–60%, and ≤40%), which was consistent with risk-stratified subgroups (kappa > 0.6). Absolute gain in OS from RT ranged from ≤5% at PFS >80% to about 21% at PFS ≤40%, with pooled HROS from 0.70 (95% CI, 0.51–0.97) to 0.48 (95% CI, 0.36–0.63) after rituximab-based CT. The OS benefit of RT was predominant in intermediate- and high-risk patients with PFS ≤ 80%.

Conclusion

We demonstrated a varied OS benefit profile of RT to inform treatment decisions and clinical trial design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信