各种精神障碍的重叠:功能网络连接分析

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Hossein Dini , Luis E. Bruni , Thomas Z. Ramsøy , Vince D. Calhoun , Mohammad S.E. Sendi
{"title":"各种精神障碍的重叠:功能网络连接分析","authors":"Hossein Dini ,&nbsp;Luis E. Bruni ,&nbsp;Thomas Z. Ramsøy ,&nbsp;Vince D. Calhoun ,&nbsp;Mohammad S.E. Sendi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Functional network connectivity (FNC) has previously been shown to distinguish patient groups from healthy controls (HC). However, the overlap across psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar (BP), and schizoaffective disorder (SAD) is not evident yet. This study focuses on studying the overlap across these three psychotic disorders in both dynamic and static FNC (dFNC/sFNC). We used resting-state fMRI, demographics, and clinical information from the Bipolar–Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes cohort (BSNIP). The data includes three groups of patients with schizophrenia (SZ, <em>N</em> = 181), bipolar (BP, <em>N</em> = 163), and schizoaffective (SAD, <em>N</em> = 130) and HC (<em>N</em> = 238) groups. After estimating each individual's dFNC, we group them into three distinct states. We evaluated two dFNC features, including occupancy rate (OCR) and distance travelled over time. Finally, the extracted features, including both sFNC and dFNC, are tested statistically across patients and HC groups. In addition, we explored the link between the clinical scores and the extracted features. We evaluated the connectivity patterns and their overlap among SZ, BP, and SAD disorders (false discovery rate or FDR corrected <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Results showed dFNC captured unique information about overlap across disorders where all disorder groups showed similar pattern of activity in state 2. Moreover, the results showed similar patterns between SZ and SAD in state 1 which was different than BP. Finally, the distance travelled feature of SZ (average <em>R</em> = 0.245, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and combined distance travelled from all disorders was predictive of the PANSS symptoms scores (average <em>R</em> = 0.147, p &lt; 0.01).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 112354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The overlap across psychotic disorders: A functional network connectivity analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Dini ,&nbsp;Luis E. Bruni ,&nbsp;Thomas Z. Ramsøy ,&nbsp;Vince D. Calhoun ,&nbsp;Mohammad S.E. Sendi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Functional network connectivity (FNC) has previously been shown to distinguish patient groups from healthy controls (HC). However, the overlap across psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar (BP), and schizoaffective disorder (SAD) is not evident yet. This study focuses on studying the overlap across these three psychotic disorders in both dynamic and static FNC (dFNC/sFNC). We used resting-state fMRI, demographics, and clinical information from the Bipolar–Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes cohort (BSNIP). The data includes three groups of patients with schizophrenia (SZ, <em>N</em> = 181), bipolar (BP, <em>N</em> = 163), and schizoaffective (SAD, <em>N</em> = 130) and HC (<em>N</em> = 238) groups. After estimating each individual's dFNC, we group them into three distinct states. We evaluated two dFNC features, including occupancy rate (OCR) and distance travelled over time. Finally, the extracted features, including both sFNC and dFNC, are tested statistically across patients and HC groups. In addition, we explored the link between the clinical scores and the extracted features. We evaluated the connectivity patterns and their overlap among SZ, BP, and SAD disorders (false discovery rate or FDR corrected <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Results showed dFNC captured unique information about overlap across disorders where all disorder groups showed similar pattern of activity in state 2. Moreover, the results showed similar patterns between SZ and SAD in state 1 which was different than BP. Finally, the distance travelled feature of SZ (average <em>R</em> = 0.245, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and combined distance travelled from all disorders was predictive of the PANSS symptoms scores (average <em>R</em> = 0.147, p &lt; 0.01).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000588\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能网络连通性(FNC)曾被证明可以区分患者群体和健康对照组(HC)。然而,精神分裂症(SZ)、双相情感障碍(BP)和分裂情感障碍(SAD)等精神疾病之间的重叠尚不明显。本研究重点研究这三种精神疾病在动态和静态 FNC(dFNC/sFNC)方面的重叠。我们使用了双相-精神分裂症中间表型网络队列(BSNIP)中的静息态 fMRI、人口统计学和临床信息。数据包括精神分裂症(SZ,N = 181)、双相情感障碍(BP,N = 163)、分裂情感障碍(SAD,N = 130)和HC(HC,N = 238)三组患者。在估算出每个人的 dFNC 后,我们将他们分为三种不同的状态。我们评估了两个 dFNC 特征,包括占用率(OCR)和随时间移动的距离。最后,我们对提取的特征(包括 sFNC 和 dFNC)进行了跨患者和 HC 组的统计测试。此外,我们还探索了临床评分与提取特征之间的联系。我们评估了 SZ、BP 和 SAD 疾病之间的连接模式及其重叠情况(假发现率或 FDR 校正 p < 0.05)。结果表明,dFNC捕捉到了不同失调症之间重叠的独特信息,所有失调症组在状态 2 中都表现出相似的活动模式。此外,结果显示 SZ 和 SAD 在状态 1 中的活动模式与 BP 不同。最后,SZ 的旅行距离特征(平均 R = 0.245,p < 0.01)和所有失调症的合并旅行距离可预测 PANSS 症状得分(平均 R = 0.147,p < 0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The overlap across psychotic disorders: A functional network connectivity analysis

Functional network connectivity (FNC) has previously been shown to distinguish patient groups from healthy controls (HC). However, the overlap across psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar (BP), and schizoaffective disorder (SAD) is not evident yet. This study focuses on studying the overlap across these three psychotic disorders in both dynamic and static FNC (dFNC/sFNC). We used resting-state fMRI, demographics, and clinical information from the Bipolar–Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes cohort (BSNIP). The data includes three groups of patients with schizophrenia (SZ, N = 181), bipolar (BP, N = 163), and schizoaffective (SAD, N = 130) and HC (N = 238) groups. After estimating each individual's dFNC, we group them into three distinct states. We evaluated two dFNC features, including occupancy rate (OCR) and distance travelled over time. Finally, the extracted features, including both sFNC and dFNC, are tested statistically across patients and HC groups. In addition, we explored the link between the clinical scores and the extracted features. We evaluated the connectivity patterns and their overlap among SZ, BP, and SAD disorders (false discovery rate or FDR corrected p < 0.05). Results showed dFNC captured unique information about overlap across disorders where all disorder groups showed similar pattern of activity in state 2. Moreover, the results showed similar patterns between SZ and SAD in state 1 which was different than BP. Finally, the distance travelled feature of SZ (average R = 0.245, p < 0.01) and combined distance travelled from all disorders was predictive of the PANSS symptoms scores (average R = 0.147, p < 0.01).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信