BScMed Madeline Bhend, BS Chase Gauthier, MD Tyler Gonzalez, M. J. B. Md
{"title":"拇趾外翻手术后患者报告结果的比较:改良 Lapidus 与微创技术","authors":"BScMed Madeline Bhend, BS Chase Gauthier, MD Tyler Gonzalez, M. J. B. Md","doi":"10.1177/2473011424S00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Purpose: The modified Lapidus procedure (MLP) or a minimally invasive surgery distal transverse osteotomy (MISDTO) are acceptable surgical treatment options for hallux valgus. The current literature is evolving when comparing the effects of each procedure on patient reported outcomes and post-operative complications. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and patient reported outcomes using the Patient Reported Outcome Instrumentation System (PROMIS) for the MLP and MISDTO. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a MLP or MISDTO for hallux valgus correction at Prisma Health Midlands between February 2020 – February 2022. Data collected included: demographic data, postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and PROMIS scores, including Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility scores. Paired Student’s T-Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to compare continuous variables and Chi-Squared test for categorical variables. Results: A total of 81 patients undergoing MLP and 78 undergoing MISDTO were included in the study. Average follow-up for MLP and MISDTO patients was 53.7 and 43.4 weeks, respectively. MLP demonstrated significant improvement in PI (52.5 vs 56.8, P< 0.001) and Mobility (46.3 vs 43.4, P=0.044) scores, while MISDTO demonstrated a significant improvement in PI (48.8 vs 57.1, P< 0.001), PF (50.2 vs 44.9, P< 0.001), and Mobility (49 vs 42.8, P< 0.001) scores. MISDTO patients had significantly larger improvements in PI (7.6 vs 4.5, P=0.008), PF (5.3 vs 2.2, P=0.026), and Mobility (5.5 vs 2.9, P=0.02) compared to MLP patients. MISDTO patients had a significantly lower non-union rate (13.6% vs 2.6%, P=0.025), hardware failure rate (0% vs 9.9%, P=0.007), and time to weight-bear (2.2 vs 7.8 weeks, P< 0.001). Conclusion: Both MLP and MISDTO procedures are effective treatments for improving the pain and mobility issues associated with hallux valgus while maintaining patients’ function. MISDTO was found to improve patient reported outcomes significantly more than MLP, with a lower non-union rate, lower hardware failure rate, and shorter time to weight-bear. These findings suggest MISDTO is superior to MLP in improving patient reported outcomes and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of hallux valgus. Further study multicenter and long term outcome studies could be useful further evaluate these short term findings.","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"162 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Post-Operative Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Following Bunion Surgery: Modified Lapidus vs Minimally Invasive Techniques\",\"authors\":\"BScMed Madeline Bhend, BS Chase Gauthier, MD Tyler Gonzalez, M. J. B. Md\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2473011424S00042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction/Purpose: The modified Lapidus procedure (MLP) or a minimally invasive surgery distal transverse osteotomy (MISDTO) are acceptable surgical treatment options for hallux valgus. The current literature is evolving when comparing the effects of each procedure on patient reported outcomes and post-operative complications. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and patient reported outcomes using the Patient Reported Outcome Instrumentation System (PROMIS) for the MLP and MISDTO. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a MLP or MISDTO for hallux valgus correction at Prisma Health Midlands between February 2020 – February 2022. Data collected included: demographic data, postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and PROMIS scores, including Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility scores. Paired Student’s T-Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to compare continuous variables and Chi-Squared test for categorical variables. Results: A total of 81 patients undergoing MLP and 78 undergoing MISDTO were included in the study. Average follow-up for MLP and MISDTO patients was 53.7 and 43.4 weeks, respectively. MLP demonstrated significant improvement in PI (52.5 vs 56.8, P< 0.001) and Mobility (46.3 vs 43.4, P=0.044) scores, while MISDTO demonstrated a significant improvement in PI (48.8 vs 57.1, P< 0.001), PF (50.2 vs 44.9, P< 0.001), and Mobility (49 vs 42.8, P< 0.001) scores. MISDTO patients had significantly larger improvements in PI (7.6 vs 4.5, P=0.008), PF (5.3 vs 2.2, P=0.026), and Mobility (5.5 vs 2.9, P=0.02) compared to MLP patients. MISDTO patients had a significantly lower non-union rate (13.6% vs 2.6%, P=0.025), hardware failure rate (0% vs 9.9%, P=0.007), and time to weight-bear (2.2 vs 7.8 weeks, P< 0.001). Conclusion: Both MLP and MISDTO procedures are effective treatments for improving the pain and mobility issues associated with hallux valgus while maintaining patients’ function. MISDTO was found to improve patient reported outcomes significantly more than MLP, with a lower non-union rate, lower hardware failure rate, and shorter time to weight-bear. These findings suggest MISDTO is superior to MLP in improving patient reported outcomes and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of hallux valgus. Further study multicenter and long term outcome studies could be useful further evaluate these short term findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424S00042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424S00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言/目的:改良Lapidus手术(MLP)或微创手术远端横向截骨术(MISDTO)是可以接受的治疗外翻的手术方法。在比较每种手术对患者报告结果和术后并发症的影响时,目前的文献还在不断发展。本研究的目的是使用患者报告结果工具系统(PROMIS)比较MLP和MISDTO的术后效果、负重时间和患者报告结果。方法:本研究回顾性分析了2020年2月至2022年2月期间在Prisma Health Midlands接受MLP或MISDTO矫正外翻的患者。收集的数据包括:人口统计学数据、术后结果、负重时间和PROMIS评分,包括疼痛干扰(PI)、身体功能(PF)和活动能力评分。对连续变量采用配对学生 T 检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,对分类变量采用 Chi-Squared 检验。结果共有81名患者接受了MLP治疗,78名患者接受了MISDTO治疗。MLP 和 MISDTO 患者的平均随访时间分别为 53.7 周和 43.4 周。MLP显示PI(52.5 vs 56.8,P< 0.001)和Mobility(46.3 vs 43.4,P=0.044)评分有明显改善,而MISDTO显示PI(48.8 vs 57.1,P< 0.001)、PF(50.2 vs 44.9,P< 0.001)和Mobility(49 vs 42.8,P< 0.001)评分有明显改善。与MLP患者相比,MISDTO患者在PI(7.6 vs 4.5,P=0.008)、PF(5.3 vs 2.2,P=0.026)和活动能力(5.5 vs 2.9,P=0.02)方面的改善幅度明显更大。MISDTO患者的未愈合率(13.6% vs 2.6%,P=0.025)、硬件失败率(0% vs 9.9%,P=0.007)和负重时间(2.2 vs 7.8周,P< 0.001)均明显低于MLP患者。结论:MLP和MISDTO手术都是有效的治疗方法,可改善与足外翻相关的疼痛和活动问题,同时保持患者的功能。研究发现,MISDTO比MLP更能改善患者报告的结果,其非愈合率更低,硬件故障率更低,负重时间更短。这些研究结果表明,MISDTO 在改善患者报告结果和治疗外翻的术后效果方面优于 MLP。进一步的多中心研究和长期疗效研究将有助于进一步评估这些短期研究结果。
A Comparison of Post-Operative Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Following Bunion Surgery: Modified Lapidus vs Minimally Invasive Techniques
Introduction/Purpose: The modified Lapidus procedure (MLP) or a minimally invasive surgery distal transverse osteotomy (MISDTO) are acceptable surgical treatment options for hallux valgus. The current literature is evolving when comparing the effects of each procedure on patient reported outcomes and post-operative complications. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and patient reported outcomes using the Patient Reported Outcome Instrumentation System (PROMIS) for the MLP and MISDTO. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a MLP or MISDTO for hallux valgus correction at Prisma Health Midlands between February 2020 – February 2022. Data collected included: demographic data, postoperative outcomes, time to weight bear, and PROMIS scores, including Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Mobility scores. Paired Student’s T-Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were used to compare continuous variables and Chi-Squared test for categorical variables. Results: A total of 81 patients undergoing MLP and 78 undergoing MISDTO were included in the study. Average follow-up for MLP and MISDTO patients was 53.7 and 43.4 weeks, respectively. MLP demonstrated significant improvement in PI (52.5 vs 56.8, P< 0.001) and Mobility (46.3 vs 43.4, P=0.044) scores, while MISDTO demonstrated a significant improvement in PI (48.8 vs 57.1, P< 0.001), PF (50.2 vs 44.9, P< 0.001), and Mobility (49 vs 42.8, P< 0.001) scores. MISDTO patients had significantly larger improvements in PI (7.6 vs 4.5, P=0.008), PF (5.3 vs 2.2, P=0.026), and Mobility (5.5 vs 2.9, P=0.02) compared to MLP patients. MISDTO patients had a significantly lower non-union rate (13.6% vs 2.6%, P=0.025), hardware failure rate (0% vs 9.9%, P=0.007), and time to weight-bear (2.2 vs 7.8 weeks, P< 0.001). Conclusion: Both MLP and MISDTO procedures are effective treatments for improving the pain and mobility issues associated with hallux valgus while maintaining patients’ function. MISDTO was found to improve patient reported outcomes significantly more than MLP, with a lower non-union rate, lower hardware failure rate, and shorter time to weight-bear. These findings suggest MISDTO is superior to MLP in improving patient reported outcomes and postoperative outcomes in the treatment of hallux valgus. Further study multicenter and long term outcome studies could be useful further evaluate these short term findings.