一项随机临床试验,比较了利多卡因静脉注射、鼻内注射或眶下神经阻滞剂对接受喙突鼻切除术的狗的疗效。

IF 1.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Maria Isabel Gomez-Martinez , Jodie Hughes , Briony Alderson , Julia Deutsch
{"title":"一项随机临床试验,比较了利多卡因静脉注射、鼻内注射或眶下神经阻滞剂对接受喙突鼻切除术的狗的疗效。","authors":"Maria Isabel Gomez-Martinez ,&nbsp;Jodie Hughes ,&nbsp;Briony Alderson ,&nbsp;Julia Deutsch","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the efficacy of lidocaine administered intravenously, intranasally or as an infraorbital nerve block in dogs undergoing rostral rhinoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Randomized clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><p>A total of 43 client-owned dogs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After premedication with medetomidine 0.01 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> and methadone 0.2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> intramuscularly, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Dogs were randomly allocated to receive 2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> of 2% lidocaine as a bilateral infraorbital nerve block (INB) via the caudal intraoral approach, via bilateral topical intranasal administration (TIA) or as an intravenous bolus (IVB). At 5 minutes following lidocaine administration, responses to rhinoscopy (RR) and biopsies (RB) were evaluated using a simple scoring system (0: no reaction; 1: reaction). Response to the rhinoscopy in the recovery period (RE) was recorded. Recovery quality was scored using a simple descriptive score. Heart rate, respiratory rate and noninvasive arterial blood pressure were recorded. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl 0.001 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> was administered if an increase &gt; 20% in any variable occurred. Gross movement was attenuated using propofol 0.5 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> IV. Scores were analysed using the Chi-square test with Monte Carlo method. Cardiorespiratory changes among and overtime between groups were compared using one-way <span>anova</span> and one-way <span>anova</span> for repeated measures, respectively, or the correspondent non-parametric tests; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Of the 43 dogs, 42 completed the study. No statistically significant differences were detected in either physical reactions or changes in cardiorespiratory variables for RR, RB, RE or recovery quality, although RB tended to be higher in group TIA (7/10 <em>versus</em> 1/10 INB and 3/13 IVB).Various cardiorespiratory variables changed overtime within groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><p>In dogs, all three investigated techniques attenuated responses during rostral rhinoscopy in dogs, although INB and IVB were more efficacious when biopsies were taken.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of lidocaine administered intravenously, intranasally or as infraorbital nerve block in dogs undergoing rostral rhinosocopy\",\"authors\":\"Maria Isabel Gomez-Martinez ,&nbsp;Jodie Hughes ,&nbsp;Briony Alderson ,&nbsp;Julia Deutsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the efficacy of lidocaine administered intravenously, intranasally or as an infraorbital nerve block in dogs undergoing rostral rhinoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Randomized clinical trial.</p></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><p>A total of 43 client-owned dogs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After premedication with medetomidine 0.01 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> and methadone 0.2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> intramuscularly, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Dogs were randomly allocated to receive 2 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> of 2% lidocaine as a bilateral infraorbital nerve block (INB) via the caudal intraoral approach, via bilateral topical intranasal administration (TIA) or as an intravenous bolus (IVB). At 5 minutes following lidocaine administration, responses to rhinoscopy (RR) and biopsies (RB) were evaluated using a simple scoring system (0: no reaction; 1: reaction). Response to the rhinoscopy in the recovery period (RE) was recorded. Recovery quality was scored using a simple descriptive score. Heart rate, respiratory rate and noninvasive arterial blood pressure were recorded. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl 0.001 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> was administered if an increase &gt; 20% in any variable occurred. Gross movement was attenuated using propofol 0.5 mg kg<sup>–1</sup> IV. Scores were analysed using the Chi-square test with Monte Carlo method. Cardiorespiratory changes among and overtime between groups were compared using one-way <span>anova</span> and one-way <span>anova</span> for repeated measures, respectively, or the correspondent non-parametric tests; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Of the 43 dogs, 42 completed the study. No statistically significant differences were detected in either physical reactions or changes in cardiorespiratory variables for RR, RB, RE or recovery quality, although RB tended to be higher in group TIA (7/10 <em>versus</em> 1/10 INB and 3/13 IVB).Various cardiorespiratory variables changed overtime within groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><p>In dogs, all three investigated techniques attenuated responses during rostral rhinoscopy in dogs, although INB and IVB were more efficacious when biopsies were taken.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较利多卡因静脉注射、鼻内注射或眶下神经阻滞剂对接受喙突鼻镜检查的狗的疗效。方法在使用美托咪定 0.01 毫克/千克-1 和美沙酮 0.2 毫克/千克-1 肌肉注射进行预处理后,使用丙泊酚诱导麻醉,并在氧气中使用异氟醚维持麻醉。狗被随机分配接受 2 毫克/千克-1 的 2% 利多卡因,通过口腔内尾部途径、双侧局部鼻内给药(TIA)或静脉注射(IVB)进行双侧眶下神经阻滞(INB)。注射利多卡因 5 分钟后,采用简单的评分系统(0:无反应;1:有反应)评估患者对鼻镜检查(RR)和活检(RB)的反应。对恢复期鼻镜检查的反应(RE)进行记录。恢复质量采用简单的描述性评分。记录心率、呼吸频率和无创动脉血压。如果任何变量增加了 20%,则静脉注射 0.001 毫克/千克的芬太尼。使用异丙酚 0.5 毫克/公斤-1 静脉注射可减轻大运动量。采用蒙特卡洛方法进行卡方检验。组间和组间超时心肺功能变化的比较分别采用重复测量的单因子anova和单因子anova,或相应的非参数检验;P < 0.05。在RR、RB、RE或恢复质量方面,无论是身体反应还是心肺变量的变化都没有发现有统计学意义的差异,但TIA组的RB往往更高(7/10对1/10 INB和3/13 IVB)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of lidocaine administered intravenously, intranasally or as infraorbital nerve block in dogs undergoing rostral rhinosocopy

Objective

To compare the efficacy of lidocaine administered intravenously, intranasally or as an infraorbital nerve block in dogs undergoing rostral rhinoscopy.

Study design

Randomized clinical trial.

Animals

A total of 43 client-owned dogs.

Methods

After premedication with medetomidine 0.01 mg kg–1 and methadone 0.2 mg kg–1 intramuscularly, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Dogs were randomly allocated to receive 2 mg kg–1 of 2% lidocaine as a bilateral infraorbital nerve block (INB) via the caudal intraoral approach, via bilateral topical intranasal administration (TIA) or as an intravenous bolus (IVB). At 5 minutes following lidocaine administration, responses to rhinoscopy (RR) and biopsies (RB) were evaluated using a simple scoring system (0: no reaction; 1: reaction). Response to the rhinoscopy in the recovery period (RE) was recorded. Recovery quality was scored using a simple descriptive score. Heart rate, respiratory rate and noninvasive arterial blood pressure were recorded. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl 0.001 mg kg-1 was administered if an increase > 20% in any variable occurred. Gross movement was attenuated using propofol 0.5 mg kg–1 IV. Scores were analysed using the Chi-square test with Monte Carlo method. Cardiorespiratory changes among and overtime between groups were compared using one-way anova and one-way anova for repeated measures, respectively, or the correspondent non-parametric tests; p < 0.05.

Result

Of the 43 dogs, 42 completed the study. No statistically significant differences were detected in either physical reactions or changes in cardiorespiratory variables for RR, RB, RE or recovery quality, although RB tended to be higher in group TIA (7/10 versus 1/10 INB and 3/13 IVB).Various cardiorespiratory variables changed overtime within groups.

Conclusions and clinical relevance

In dogs, all three investigated techniques attenuated responses during rostral rhinoscopy in dogs, although INB and IVB were more efficacious when biopsies were taken.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信