预测不同潮汐系统下全球大地水准面模型高度异常的潜在误差

A. Fedorchuk
{"title":"预测不同潮汐系统下全球大地水准面模型高度异常的潜在误差","authors":"A. Fedorchuk","doi":"10.33841/1819-1339-1-47-58-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the method of predicting the errors of height anomalies obtained from high-order global geoid models (EGM_2008, EIGEN_6C4, GECO, XGM2019e2159, SGG_UGM_2) and taking into account different tide systems (free/zero/mean-tide). A correct understanding of how much the choice of the global model height tide system affects the accuracy of calculating the normal heights of the Earth’s physical surface is an important component for obtaining reliable results. The purpose of the work is to predict the potential errors of height anomalies for three main concepts of tidal corrections (tidal systems) used in the creation of global geoid models. Method. The essence of the prediction method is to find a connection between the height anomalies of the global geoid models and the PL-quasi-geoid2021 regional quasi-geoid model. On the basis of the established connection, the prediction of potential errors of height anomalies was made, taking into account the choice of one or another system of tides. The prediction of the errors of height anomalies is implemented on the basis of 200 GNSS stations located on the territory of Ukraine and in the border sector. To find the connection between the heights of the global geoid models and the PL-quasi-geoid2021 regional model, a territory was allocated in the western border sector measuring 48°-52° in latitude and 21°-25° in longitude. For 36 GNSS stations located in the border area, a scale coefficient between global and regional height anomalies was found. Results. In the border sector, the factual errors of height anomalies are estimated at the level of 0.01-0.03 m based on the standard deviation and at the level of the mean square deviation of 0.17–0.18 m, 0.15-0.16 m, and 0.08–0.09 m for the free, zero and mean-tide systems, respectively. The standard deviations of the predicted potential errors for the border sector were 0.02-0.03 m, and the mean square values were 0.17–0.18 m, 0.13 m and 0.06 m for similar tidal systems. The residual errors of height anomalies for the border sector amounted to 0.03 m according to the standard and mean square deviation. Assessment of accuracy prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of models EGM_2008, EIGEN_6C4, GECO, XGM2019e2159, SGG_UGM_2 carried out on the basis of 200 GNSS stations was 0.03 m by standard deviation and 0.15 m (free-tide), 0.13 m (zero-tide) and 0.06 m (mean-tide) by mean square value. Scientific novelty. First implemented was the prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of global geoid models, which was performed by the scale factor for GNSS stations located on the territory of Ukraine and taking into account different tidal systems. Practical significance. The predicted errors of height anomalies make it possible to calculate the normal heights of GNSS stations and points on the Earth’s physical surface with an accuracy of about 3 cm. The obtained results allow the use of height anomalies of global geoid models of high order for more accurate geodetics work.","PeriodicalId":422474,"journal":{"name":"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry","volume":"508 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of global geoid models for different tidal systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Fedorchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.33841/1819-1339-1-47-58-68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the method of predicting the errors of height anomalies obtained from high-order global geoid models (EGM_2008, EIGEN_6C4, GECO, XGM2019e2159, SGG_UGM_2) and taking into account different tide systems (free/zero/mean-tide). A correct understanding of how much the choice of the global model height tide system affects the accuracy of calculating the normal heights of the Earth’s physical surface is an important component for obtaining reliable results. The purpose of the work is to predict the potential errors of height anomalies for three main concepts of tidal corrections (tidal systems) used in the creation of global geoid models. Method. The essence of the prediction method is to find a connection between the height anomalies of the global geoid models and the PL-quasi-geoid2021 regional quasi-geoid model. On the basis of the established connection, the prediction of potential errors of height anomalies was made, taking into account the choice of one or another system of tides. The prediction of the errors of height anomalies is implemented on the basis of 200 GNSS stations located on the territory of Ukraine and in the border sector. To find the connection between the heights of the global geoid models and the PL-quasi-geoid2021 regional model, a territory was allocated in the western border sector measuring 48°-52° in latitude and 21°-25° in longitude. For 36 GNSS stations located in the border area, a scale coefficient between global and regional height anomalies was found. Results. In the border sector, the factual errors of height anomalies are estimated at the level of 0.01-0.03 m based on the standard deviation and at the level of the mean square deviation of 0.17–0.18 m, 0.15-0.16 m, and 0.08–0.09 m for the free, zero and mean-tide systems, respectively. The standard deviations of the predicted potential errors for the border sector were 0.02-0.03 m, and the mean square values were 0.17–0.18 m, 0.13 m and 0.06 m for similar tidal systems. The residual errors of height anomalies for the border sector amounted to 0.03 m according to the standard and mean square deviation. Assessment of accuracy prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of models EGM_2008, EIGEN_6C4, GECO, XGM2019e2159, SGG_UGM_2 carried out on the basis of 200 GNSS stations was 0.03 m by standard deviation and 0.15 m (free-tide), 0.13 m (zero-tide) and 0.06 m (mean-tide) by mean square value. Scientific novelty. First implemented was the prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of global geoid models, which was performed by the scale factor for GNSS stations located on the territory of Ukraine and taking into account different tidal systems. Practical significance. The predicted errors of height anomalies make it possible to calculate the normal heights of GNSS stations and points on the Earth’s physical surface with an accuracy of about 3 cm. The obtained results allow the use of height anomalies of global geoid models of high order for more accurate geodetics work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry\",\"volume\":\"508 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-1-47-58-68\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-1-47-58-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章介绍了预测从高阶全球大地水准面模型(EGM_2008、EIGEN_6C4、GECO、XGM2019e2159、SGG_UGM_2)获得的高度异常误差的方法,并考虑了不同的潮汐系统(自由潮/零潮/平均潮)。正确理解全球模式高度潮汐系统的选择对地球物理表面法线高度计算精度的影响,是获得可靠结果的重要组成部分。这项工作的目的是预测用于创建全球大地水准面模型的三种主要潮汐修正概念(潮汐系统)的高度异常的潜在误差。方法。预测方法的实质是找到全球大地水准面模型的高度异常与 PL-quasi-geoid2021 区域准大地水准面模型之间的联系。在建立联系的基础上,考虑到选择一种或另一种潮汐系统,对高度异常的潜在误差进行预测。高度异常误差的预测是在位于乌克兰领土和边境地区的 200 个全球导航卫星系 统台站的基础上进行的。为了找到全球大地水准面模型和 PL-quasi-geoid2021 区域模型高度之间的联系,在西部边境地区分配了一块纬度为 48°-52°、经度为 21°-25°的区域。对于位于边界地区的 36 个全球导航卫星系统台站,找到了全球和区域高度异常之间的比例系数。结果。在边境地区,根据标准偏差估计高度异常的实际误差为 0.01-0.03 米,自由潮、零潮和平均潮系统的均方偏差分别为 0.17-0.18 米、0.15-0.16 米和 0.08-0.09 米。在类似潮汐系统中,边界地区预测潜在误差的标准偏差为 0.02-0.03 米,均方差值分别为 0.17-0.18 米、0.13 米和 0.06 米。根据标准偏差和均方偏差,边界地区高度异常的残余误差为 0.03 米。在 200 个全球导航卫星系统台站的基础上,对 EGM_2008、EIGEN_6C4、GECO、XGM2019e2159、SGG_UGM_2 模型高度异常的潜在误差进行了精度预测评估,标准偏差为 0.03 米,均方值为 0.15 米(自由潮)、0.13 米(零潮)和 0.06 米(平均潮)。科学新颖性。首次对全球大地水准面模型高度异常的潜在误差进行了预测,该预测是根据位于乌克兰境内的全球导航卫星系统台站的比例因子进行的,并考虑到了不同的潮汐系统。实际意义。通过预测高度异常误差,可以计算全球导航卫星系统台站和地球表面各点的正常 高度,精确度约为 3 厘米。根据所获得的结果,可以使用高阶全球大地水准面模型的高度异常值来进行更精确的大地测量工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of global geoid models for different tidal systems
The article presents the method of predicting the errors of height anomalies obtained from high-order global geoid models (EGM_2008, EIGEN_6C4, GECO, XGM2019e2159, SGG_UGM_2) and taking into account different tide systems (free/zero/mean-tide). A correct understanding of how much the choice of the global model height tide system affects the accuracy of calculating the normal heights of the Earth’s physical surface is an important component for obtaining reliable results. The purpose of the work is to predict the potential errors of height anomalies for three main concepts of tidal corrections (tidal systems) used in the creation of global geoid models. Method. The essence of the prediction method is to find a connection between the height anomalies of the global geoid models and the PL-quasi-geoid2021 regional quasi-geoid model. On the basis of the established connection, the prediction of potential errors of height anomalies was made, taking into account the choice of one or another system of tides. The prediction of the errors of height anomalies is implemented on the basis of 200 GNSS stations located on the territory of Ukraine and in the border sector. To find the connection between the heights of the global geoid models and the PL-quasi-geoid2021 regional model, a territory was allocated in the western border sector measuring 48°-52° in latitude and 21°-25° in longitude. For 36 GNSS stations located in the border area, a scale coefficient between global and regional height anomalies was found. Results. In the border sector, the factual errors of height anomalies are estimated at the level of 0.01-0.03 m based on the standard deviation and at the level of the mean square deviation of 0.17–0.18 m, 0.15-0.16 m, and 0.08–0.09 m for the free, zero and mean-tide systems, respectively. The standard deviations of the predicted potential errors for the border sector were 0.02-0.03 m, and the mean square values were 0.17–0.18 m, 0.13 m and 0.06 m for similar tidal systems. The residual errors of height anomalies for the border sector amounted to 0.03 m according to the standard and mean square deviation. Assessment of accuracy prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of models EGM_2008, EIGEN_6C4, GECO, XGM2019e2159, SGG_UGM_2 carried out on the basis of 200 GNSS stations was 0.03 m by standard deviation and 0.15 m (free-tide), 0.13 m (zero-tide) and 0.06 m (mean-tide) by mean square value. Scientific novelty. First implemented was the prediction of potential errors of height anomalies of global geoid models, which was performed by the scale factor for GNSS stations located on the territory of Ukraine and taking into account different tidal systems. Practical significance. The predicted errors of height anomalies make it possible to calculate the normal heights of GNSS stations and points on the Earth’s physical surface with an accuracy of about 3 cm. The obtained results allow the use of height anomalies of global geoid models of high order for more accurate geodetics work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信