贸易开放会改善还是恶化撒哈拉以南非洲的公共治理?

Gislain Stéphane Gandjon Fankem , Cédric Feyom
{"title":"贸易开放会改善还是恶化撒哈拉以南非洲的公共治理?","authors":"Gislain Stéphane Gandjon Fankem ,&nbsp;Cédric Feyom","doi":"10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature on the effect of trade openness on public governance shows contrasting results. Using a renewed empirical strategy, we contribute to the understanding of this indeterminacy by studying the influence of trade openness on public governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. We also examine how this effect varies with structural characteristics that may be subject to reforms. In this respect, we use an original measure of trade openness. We consider public governance and its three dimensions, namely economic governance, political governance, and institutional governance. Overall, we find that trade openness improves public governance, political governance, and economic governance. On the other hand, it worsens institutional governance. Moreover, these effects of trade openness on the dimensions of public governance depend on the defined levels of technology transfer, foreign direct investment, and natural resources. Our results are robust to different openness and governance indicators, alternative specifications, study periods, endogeneity, and cross-sectional dependence. Above all, they highlight the interest of dissociating public governance to understand the contrast observed in the empirical literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13794,"journal":{"name":"International Economics","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 100502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does trade openness improve or worsen public governance in sub-Saharan Africa?\",\"authors\":\"Gislain Stéphane Gandjon Fankem ,&nbsp;Cédric Feyom\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The literature on the effect of trade openness on public governance shows contrasting results. Using a renewed empirical strategy, we contribute to the understanding of this indeterminacy by studying the influence of trade openness on public governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. We also examine how this effect varies with structural characteristics that may be subject to reforms. In this respect, we use an original measure of trade openness. We consider public governance and its three dimensions, namely economic governance, political governance, and institutional governance. Overall, we find that trade openness improves public governance, political governance, and economic governance. On the other hand, it worsens institutional governance. Moreover, these effects of trade openness on the dimensions of public governance depend on the defined levels of technology transfer, foreign direct investment, and natural resources. Our results are robust to different openness and governance indicators, alternative specifications, study periods, endogeneity, and cross-sectional dependence. Above all, they highlight the interest of dissociating public governance to understand the contrast observed in the empirical literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economics\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701724000258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701724000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于贸易开放对公共治理的影响的文献显示了截然不同的结果。我们采用新的实证策略,通过研究贸易开放对撒哈拉以南非洲公共治理的影响,有助于理解这种不确定性。我们还研究了这种影响是如何随可能进行改革的结构特征而变化的。在这方面,我们使用了一种独创的贸易开放度衡量标准。我们考虑了公共治理及其三个维度,即经济治理、政治治理和制度治理。总体而言,我们发现贸易开放会改善公共治理、政治治理和经济治理。另一方面,贸易开放会恶化制度治理。此外,贸易开放对公共治理的影响取决于技术转让、外国直接投资和自然资源的定义水平。我们的研究结果对不同的开放度和治理指标、替代规格、研究时期、内生性和横截面依赖性都是稳健的。最重要的是,它们凸显了将公共治理分离开来以理解实证文献中观察到的反差的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does trade openness improve or worsen public governance in sub-Saharan Africa?

The literature on the effect of trade openness on public governance shows contrasting results. Using a renewed empirical strategy, we contribute to the understanding of this indeterminacy by studying the influence of trade openness on public governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. We also examine how this effect varies with structural characteristics that may be subject to reforms. In this respect, we use an original measure of trade openness. We consider public governance and its three dimensions, namely economic governance, political governance, and institutional governance. Overall, we find that trade openness improves public governance, political governance, and economic governance. On the other hand, it worsens institutional governance. Moreover, these effects of trade openness on the dimensions of public governance depend on the defined levels of technology transfer, foreign direct investment, and natural resources. Our results are robust to different openness and governance indicators, alternative specifications, study periods, endogeneity, and cross-sectional dependence. Above all, they highlight the interest of dissociating public governance to understand the contrast observed in the empirical literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Economics
International Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信