象征性工艺品的演变:功能如何塑造形式

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Murillo Pagnotta , Izzy Wisher , Malte Lau Petersen , Felix Riede , Riccardo Fusaroli , Kristian Tylén
{"title":"象征性工艺品的演变:功能如何塑造形式","authors":"Murillo Pagnotta ,&nbsp;Izzy Wisher ,&nbsp;Malte Lau Petersen ,&nbsp;Felix Riede ,&nbsp;Riccardo Fusaroli ,&nbsp;Kristian Tylén","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the indisputable significance of human symbolic cognition and behavior, we still lack a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which such capacities evolved during the Paleolithic. An important source of evidence is constituted by archaeological findings of intentional markings left on rock and bone surfaces, but these are often opaque with respect to their original meaning and function. Here we present experimental work that systematically addresses the relation between properties of intentional markings and their cognitive implications to support inferences about their past functions. Participants reproduced engraved markings dating to c. 100.000 years ago from the South African Blombos and Diepkloof sites in three conditions of cultural transmission: as part of an aesthetic, identity marking, and communicative activity. Their reproductions were then used as stimuli in a suite of five perceptual experiments to investigate differences in their cognitive implications over time and explore similarities with the archaeological record.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 261-267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000357/pdfft?md5=1ec72782a4b0ff4b43e7da70b3febd15&pid=1-s2.0-S1090513824000357-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evolution of symbolic artefacts: How function shapes form\",\"authors\":\"Murillo Pagnotta ,&nbsp;Izzy Wisher ,&nbsp;Malte Lau Petersen ,&nbsp;Felix Riede ,&nbsp;Riccardo Fusaroli ,&nbsp;Kristian Tylén\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the indisputable significance of human symbolic cognition and behavior, we still lack a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which such capacities evolved during the Paleolithic. An important source of evidence is constituted by archaeological findings of intentional markings left on rock and bone surfaces, but these are often opaque with respect to their original meaning and function. Here we present experimental work that systematically addresses the relation between properties of intentional markings and their cognitive implications to support inferences about their past functions. Participants reproduced engraved markings dating to c. 100.000 years ago from the South African Blombos and Diepkloof sites in three conditions of cultural transmission: as part of an aesthetic, identity marking, and communicative activity. Their reproductions were then used as stimuli in a suite of five perceptual experiments to investigate differences in their cognitive implications over time and explore similarities with the archaeological record.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 261-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000357/pdfft?md5=1ec72782a4b0ff4b43e7da70b3febd15&pid=1-s2.0-S1090513824000357-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000357\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人类符号认知和行为的重要性毋庸置疑,但我们仍然缺乏对旧石器时代这种能力演变机制的详细了解。考古发现的岩石和骨骼表面有意留下的标记是一个重要的证据来源,但这些标记的原始意义和功能往往是不透明的。在此,我们介绍了一项实验研究,该研究系统地探讨了有意标记的属性与其认知含义之间的关系,以支持对其过去功能的推断。实验参与者在三种文化传播条件下复制了南非布隆博斯遗址和迪普克洛夫遗址中约 10 万年前的雕刻标记:作为审美活动、身份标记和交流活动的一部分。然后,他们的复制品被用作五项感知实验的刺激物,以研究其认知含义随时间推移而产生的差异,并探索其与考古记录的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The evolution of symbolic artefacts: How function shapes form

Despite the indisputable significance of human symbolic cognition and behavior, we still lack a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which such capacities evolved during the Paleolithic. An important source of evidence is constituted by archaeological findings of intentional markings left on rock and bone surfaces, but these are often opaque with respect to their original meaning and function. Here we present experimental work that systematically addresses the relation between properties of intentional markings and their cognitive implications to support inferences about their past functions. Participants reproduced engraved markings dating to c. 100.000 years ago from the South African Blombos and Diepkloof sites in three conditions of cultural transmission: as part of an aesthetic, identity marking, and communicative activity. Their reproductions were then used as stimuli in a suite of five perceptual experiments to investigate differences in their cognitive implications over time and explore similarities with the archaeological record.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信