Gordon P. Watt, Krishna N Keshavamurthy, T. Nguyen, M. Lobbes, M. Jochelson, Janice S. Sung, C. Moskowitz, Prusha Patel, Xiaolin Liang, Meghan Woods, John L. Hopper, M. C. Pike, J. Bernstein
{"title":"接受对比增强乳腺 X 射线照相术的妇女患乳腺癌与乳腺 X 射线密度定量测量的关系。","authors":"Gordon P. Watt, Krishna N Keshavamurthy, T. Nguyen, M. Lobbes, M. Jochelson, Janice S. Sung, C. Moskowitz, Prusha Patel, Xiaolin Liang, Meghan Woods, John L. Hopper, M. C. Pike, J. Bernstein","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women with high mammographic density (MD) have an increased risk of breast cancer. They may be offered contrast-enhanced mammogram (CEM) to improve breast cancer screening performance. Using a cohort of women receiving CEM, we evaluated whether conventional and modified MD measures were associated with breast cancer. Sixty-six cases with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer were frequency-matched on age to 133 cancer-free controls. On low-energy cranio-caudal CEMs (equivalent to standard mammogram), we measured quantitative MD using CUMULUS software at the conventional intensity threshold (\"Cumulus\") and higher-than-conventional thresholds (\"Altocumulus\", \"Cirrocumulus\"). The measures were standardized to enable estimation of odds per age- and adiposity-adjusted standard deviation (OPERA). In multivariable logistic regression of case-control status, only the highest-intensity measure, Cirrocumulus, was statistically significantly associated with breast cancer (OPERA = 1.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.89). Conventional Cumulus did not contribute to model fit. For women receiving CEM, Cirrocumulus MD might better predict breast cancer than conventional quantitative MD.","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of breast cancer with quantitative mammographic density measures for women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography.\",\"authors\":\"Gordon P. Watt, Krishna N Keshavamurthy, T. Nguyen, M. Lobbes, M. Jochelson, Janice S. Sung, C. Moskowitz, Prusha Patel, Xiaolin Liang, Meghan Woods, John L. Hopper, M. C. Pike, J. Bernstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkae026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Women with high mammographic density (MD) have an increased risk of breast cancer. They may be offered contrast-enhanced mammogram (CEM) to improve breast cancer screening performance. Using a cohort of women receiving CEM, we evaluated whether conventional and modified MD measures were associated with breast cancer. Sixty-six cases with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer were frequency-matched on age to 133 cancer-free controls. On low-energy cranio-caudal CEMs (equivalent to standard mammogram), we measured quantitative MD using CUMULUS software at the conventional intensity threshold (\\\"Cumulus\\\") and higher-than-conventional thresholds (\\\"Altocumulus\\\", \\\"Cirrocumulus\\\"). The measures were standardized to enable estimation of odds per age- and adiposity-adjusted standard deviation (OPERA). In multivariable logistic regression of case-control status, only the highest-intensity measure, Cirrocumulus, was statistically significantly associated with breast cancer (OPERA = 1.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.89). Conventional Cumulus did not contribute to model fit. For women receiving CEM, Cirrocumulus MD might better predict breast cancer than conventional quantitative MD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
乳房 X 线照相密度(MD)高的女性患乳腺癌的风险更高。为了提高乳腺癌筛查效果,她们可能会接受造影剂增强乳腺 X 线照相术(CEM)。我们利用一组接受 CEM 检查的妇女,评估了传统和改良的 MD 测量值是否与乳腺癌有关。将 66 例新确诊的单侧乳腺癌病例与 133 例未患癌症的对照组进行年龄频率匹配。我们使用 CUMULUS 软件在常规强度阈值("Cumulus")和高于常规强度阈值("Altocumulus"、"Cirrocumulus")下对低能量头颈部 CEM(相当于标准乳房 X 光检查)进行定量 MD 测量。对测量结果进行了标准化处理,以便估算出每年龄和脂肪调整标准偏差(OPERA)的几率。在病例对照状态的多变量逻辑回归中,只有强度最高的测量值 "Cirrocumulus "与乳腺癌有显著的统计学关联(OPERA = 1.40,95% CI 1.04-1.89)。常规积云对模型拟合无贡献。对于接受 CEM 治疗的妇女,Cirrocumulus MD 可能比传统的定量 MD 更能预测乳腺癌。
Association of breast cancer with quantitative mammographic density measures for women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography.
Women with high mammographic density (MD) have an increased risk of breast cancer. They may be offered contrast-enhanced mammogram (CEM) to improve breast cancer screening performance. Using a cohort of women receiving CEM, we evaluated whether conventional and modified MD measures were associated with breast cancer. Sixty-six cases with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer were frequency-matched on age to 133 cancer-free controls. On low-energy cranio-caudal CEMs (equivalent to standard mammogram), we measured quantitative MD using CUMULUS software at the conventional intensity threshold ("Cumulus") and higher-than-conventional thresholds ("Altocumulus", "Cirrocumulus"). The measures were standardized to enable estimation of odds per age- and adiposity-adjusted standard deviation (OPERA). In multivariable logistic regression of case-control status, only the highest-intensity measure, Cirrocumulus, was statistically significantly associated with breast cancer (OPERA = 1.40, 95% CI 1.04-1.89). Conventional Cumulus did not contribute to model fit. For women receiving CEM, Cirrocumulus MD might better predict breast cancer than conventional quantitative MD.