Jiwon Yang, Won-Mook Choi, Danbi Lee, J. Shim, K. Kim, Y. Lim, Han Chu Lee, D. Moon, D. Jung, J. Choi
{"title":"多结节 BCLC-A 型肝细胞癌患者肝脏切除术和经导管化疗栓塞术的疗效","authors":"Jiwon Yang, Won-Mook Choi, Danbi Lee, J. Shim, K. Kim, Y. Lim, Han Chu Lee, D. Moon, D. Jung, J. Choi","doi":"10.17998/jlc.2024.03.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThis study aimed to compare the outcomes of liver resection (LR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria who were not eligible for liver transplantation.\n\n\nMethods\nWe retrospectively analyzed 483 patients with multinodular HCC within the Milan criteria, who underwent either LR or TACE as an initial therapy between 2013 and 2022. The overall survival (OS) in the entire population and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients who underwent LR and TACE and achieved a complete response were analyzed. Propensity score (PS) matching analysis was also used for a fair comparison of outcomes between the two groups.\n\n\nResults\nAmong the 483 patients, 107 (22.2%) and 376 (77.8%) underwent LR and TACE, respectively. The median size of the largest tumor was 2.0 cm, and 72.3% of the patients had two HCC lesions. The median OS and RFS were significantly longer in the LR group than in the TACE group (p <0.01 for both). In the multivariate analysis, TACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.81 and aHR, 2.41) and large tumor size (aHR, 1.43 and aHR, 1.44) were significantly associated with worse OS and RFS, respectively. The PS-matched analysis also demonstrated that the LR group had significantly longer OS and RFS than the TACE group (PS <0.05).\n\n\nConclusion\nIn this study, LR showed better OS and RFS than TACE in patients with multinodular Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A HCC. Therefore, LR can be considered an effective treatment option for these patients.","PeriodicalId":94087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of liver cancer","volume":"602 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Liver Resection and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Multinodular BCLC-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Jiwon Yang, Won-Mook Choi, Danbi Lee, J. Shim, K. Kim, Y. Lim, Han Chu Lee, D. Moon, D. Jung, J. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.17998/jlc.2024.03.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nThis study aimed to compare the outcomes of liver resection (LR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria who were not eligible for liver transplantation.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nWe retrospectively analyzed 483 patients with multinodular HCC within the Milan criteria, who underwent either LR or TACE as an initial therapy between 2013 and 2022. The overall survival (OS) in the entire population and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients who underwent LR and TACE and achieved a complete response were analyzed. Propensity score (PS) matching analysis was also used for a fair comparison of outcomes between the two groups.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nAmong the 483 patients, 107 (22.2%) and 376 (77.8%) underwent LR and TACE, respectively. The median size of the largest tumor was 2.0 cm, and 72.3% of the patients had two HCC lesions. The median OS and RFS were significantly longer in the LR group than in the TACE group (p <0.01 for both). In the multivariate analysis, TACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.81 and aHR, 2.41) and large tumor size (aHR, 1.43 and aHR, 1.44) were significantly associated with worse OS and RFS, respectively. The PS-matched analysis also demonstrated that the LR group had significantly longer OS and RFS than the TACE group (PS <0.05).\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nIn this study, LR showed better OS and RFS than TACE in patients with multinodular Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A HCC. Therefore, LR can be considered an effective treatment option for these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of liver cancer\",\"volume\":\"602 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of liver cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2024.03.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of liver cancer","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2024.03.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景本研究旨在比较不符合肝移植条件的符合米兰标准的多结节性肝细胞癌(HCC)患者接受肝切除术(LR)和经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)的疗效。方法我们回顾性分析了483例符合米兰标准的多结节性HCC患者,这些患者在2013年至2022年间接受了LR或TACE作为初始治疗。我们分析了所有患者的总生存期(OS)以及接受 LR 和 TACE 并获得完全缓解的患者的无复发生存期(RFS)。结果483例患者中,分别有107例(22.2%)和376例(77.8%)接受了LR和TACE治疗。最大肿瘤的中位尺寸为2.0厘米,72.3%的患者有两个HCC病灶。LR组的中位OS和RFS明显长于TACE组(两者的P均<0.01)。在多变量分析中,TACE(调整后危险比[aHR]为1.81,aHR为2.41)和肿瘤体积大(aHR为1.43,aHR为1.44)分别与较差的OS和RFS显著相关。PS匹配分析也表明,LR组的OS和RFS明显长于TACE组(PS<0.05)。因此,LR 可被视为此类患者的有效治疗方案。
Outcomes of Liver Resection and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Multinodular BCLC-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Background
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of liver resection (LR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria who were not eligible for liver transplantation.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 483 patients with multinodular HCC within the Milan criteria, who underwent either LR or TACE as an initial therapy between 2013 and 2022. The overall survival (OS) in the entire population and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients who underwent LR and TACE and achieved a complete response were analyzed. Propensity score (PS) matching analysis was also used for a fair comparison of outcomes between the two groups.
Results
Among the 483 patients, 107 (22.2%) and 376 (77.8%) underwent LR and TACE, respectively. The median size of the largest tumor was 2.0 cm, and 72.3% of the patients had two HCC lesions. The median OS and RFS were significantly longer in the LR group than in the TACE group (p <0.01 for both). In the multivariate analysis, TACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.81 and aHR, 2.41) and large tumor size (aHR, 1.43 and aHR, 1.44) were significantly associated with worse OS and RFS, respectively. The PS-matched analysis also demonstrated that the LR group had significantly longer OS and RFS than the TACE group (PS <0.05).
Conclusion
In this study, LR showed better OS and RFS than TACE in patients with multinodular Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A HCC. Therefore, LR can be considered an effective treatment option for these patients.