睡眠/觉醒的规律性影响压力如何塑造执行功能

Gabriel R. Gilmore, Anna L. Smith, Fallon B. Dickinson, A. Crosswell, Wendy Berry Mendes, Lauren N. Whitehurst
{"title":"睡眠/觉醒的规律性影响压力如何塑造执行功能","authors":"Gabriel R. Gilmore, Anna L. Smith, Fallon B. Dickinson, A. Crosswell, Wendy Berry Mendes, Lauren N. Whitehurst","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2024.1359723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sleep and stress processes shape executive function. Evidence suggests that poor sleep regulation can lead to significant impairments in executive functions. Psychological stress can also directly impact a variety of executive functions, often leading to declines, but may additionally reduce executive function via its negative impact on sleep. Rates of perceived stress and poor sleep have skyrocketed in recent years. As such, it has become increasingly important to understand how daily stress exposures and sleep processes modulate executive functions.In a remote 21-day app-based study, 227 participants completed sleep and stress assessments three times a day. They also completed three executive functioning tasks at various timepoints across the 21-day study interval that assessed cognitive inhibition (Emotional Stroop task), cognitive flexibility (Trail Making Test A and B), and working memory (Backwards Digit Span).Participants with consistent sleep/wake schedules reported fewer acute stress events when compared to those with inconsistent sleep schedules. Those with greater sleep/wake regularity also had faster responses to self-relevant negative probes (vs. general negative and neutral) in the Stroop task. Further, variability in sleep/wake timing and reported acute stress exposures across the 21-day study interval interacted to predict performance on the Emotional Stroop task. Specifically, as the number of acute stress events experienced across the 21-day interval increased, participants with more regular sleep schedules had slower overall response times on the Stroop. Higher acute stress exposures led to specific response time delays to neutral and self-relevant negative probes for those with high sleep/wake regularity. We found no impact of the number of acute stress events or stress intensities on working memory span, Stroop accuracy, or Trails response time.These data may indicate that sleep/wake regularity preserves adaptive inhibitory control responses to cumulative acute stress.","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep/wake regularity influences how stress shapes executive function\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel R. Gilmore, Anna L. Smith, Fallon B. Dickinson, A. Crosswell, Wendy Berry Mendes, Lauren N. Whitehurst\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frsle.2024.1359723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sleep and stress processes shape executive function. Evidence suggests that poor sleep regulation can lead to significant impairments in executive functions. Psychological stress can also directly impact a variety of executive functions, often leading to declines, but may additionally reduce executive function via its negative impact on sleep. Rates of perceived stress and poor sleep have skyrocketed in recent years. As such, it has become increasingly important to understand how daily stress exposures and sleep processes modulate executive functions.In a remote 21-day app-based study, 227 participants completed sleep and stress assessments three times a day. They also completed three executive functioning tasks at various timepoints across the 21-day study interval that assessed cognitive inhibition (Emotional Stroop task), cognitive flexibility (Trail Making Test A and B), and working memory (Backwards Digit Span).Participants with consistent sleep/wake schedules reported fewer acute stress events when compared to those with inconsistent sleep schedules. Those with greater sleep/wake regularity also had faster responses to self-relevant negative probes (vs. general negative and neutral) in the Stroop task. Further, variability in sleep/wake timing and reported acute stress exposures across the 21-day study interval interacted to predict performance on the Emotional Stroop task. Specifically, as the number of acute stress events experienced across the 21-day interval increased, participants with more regular sleep schedules had slower overall response times on the Stroop. Higher acute stress exposures led to specific response time delays to neutral and self-relevant negative probes for those with high sleep/wake regularity. We found no impact of the number of acute stress events or stress intensities on working memory span, Stroop accuracy, or Trails response time.These data may indicate that sleep/wake regularity preserves adaptive inhibitory control responses to cumulative acute stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in sleep\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2024.1359723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2024.1359723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

睡眠和压力过程会影响执行功能。有证据表明,睡眠调节不良会导致执行功能严重受损。心理压力也会直接影响各种执行功能,通常会导致执行功能下降,但也可能通过对睡眠的负面影响降低执行功能。近年来,感知压力和睡眠不佳的比例急剧上升。在一项为期 21 天的远程应用程序研究中,227 名参与者每天三次完成睡眠和压力评估。在为期21天的远程应用程序研究中,227名参与者每天三次完成睡眠和压力评估,并在不同时间点完成了三项执行功能任务,分别评估认知抑制(情感斯特罗普任务)、认知灵活性(追踪测试A和B)和工作记忆(向后数字跨度)。与睡眠时间不一致的参与者相比,睡眠/觉醒时间一致的参与者报告的急性压力事件更少。睡眠/觉醒时间更有规律的人在斯特罗普任务中对与自身相关的负性探究(与一般负性和中性探究相比)的反应也更快。此外,在21天的研究间隔中,睡眠/觉醒时间的变化和所报告的急性压力暴露相互影响,从而预测了在情绪Stroop任务中的表现。具体来说,随着在21天研究间隔中经历的急性压力事件数量的增加,睡眠时间更规律的参与者在Stroop任务中的总体反应时间更慢。对于那些睡眠/觉醒规律性较高的人来说,较高的急性压力暴露会导致他们对中性和自我相关的负性探究的特定反应时间延迟。我们发现,急性应激事件的数量或应激强度对工作记忆时间跨度、Stroop准确性或径向反应时间均无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sleep/wake regularity influences how stress shapes executive function
Sleep and stress processes shape executive function. Evidence suggests that poor sleep regulation can lead to significant impairments in executive functions. Psychological stress can also directly impact a variety of executive functions, often leading to declines, but may additionally reduce executive function via its negative impact on sleep. Rates of perceived stress and poor sleep have skyrocketed in recent years. As such, it has become increasingly important to understand how daily stress exposures and sleep processes modulate executive functions.In a remote 21-day app-based study, 227 participants completed sleep and stress assessments three times a day. They also completed three executive functioning tasks at various timepoints across the 21-day study interval that assessed cognitive inhibition (Emotional Stroop task), cognitive flexibility (Trail Making Test A and B), and working memory (Backwards Digit Span).Participants with consistent sleep/wake schedules reported fewer acute stress events when compared to those with inconsistent sleep schedules. Those with greater sleep/wake regularity also had faster responses to self-relevant negative probes (vs. general negative and neutral) in the Stroop task. Further, variability in sleep/wake timing and reported acute stress exposures across the 21-day study interval interacted to predict performance on the Emotional Stroop task. Specifically, as the number of acute stress events experienced across the 21-day interval increased, participants with more regular sleep schedules had slower overall response times on the Stroop. Higher acute stress exposures led to specific response time delays to neutral and self-relevant negative probes for those with high sleep/wake regularity. We found no impact of the number of acute stress events or stress intensities on working memory span, Stroop accuracy, or Trails response time.These data may indicate that sleep/wake regularity preserves adaptive inhibitory control responses to cumulative acute stress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信