Krithika Shenoy, Richard J. Cote, Gayathri Kini, Mary Anthes-Bartlow, Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan
{"title":"前列腺核心活检是否不可避免?质量改进计划。","authors":"Krithika Shenoy, Richard J. Cote, Gayathri Kini, Mary Anthes-Bartlow, Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0492-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT.—\nCore biopsies are standard of care for diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. Fragmentation makes numeric assessment of cancer challenging and increases risk of inaccurate staging with direct implications on management.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE.—\nTo determine factors responsible for fragmentation at our institution.\n\n\nDESIGN.—\nProstate core biopsies performed at 2 hospital sites during 1 week were prospectively identified. Biopsies were received in multipart formalin jars, either mounted on a nonadherent dressing pad (Telfa, Medtronic Inc) or freely suspended, and grossed by experienced pathologists' assistants. Fragmentation was defined as the difference between number of cores sent by the clinician and number of cores counted by the pathologist on microscopy.\n\n\nRESULTS.—\nForty-six cases (15 benign; 31 malignant) with 535 specimen jars were identified of which 309 of 535 (57.8%) had >1 biopsy core per jar; 230 of 535 (43%) were received mounted on Telfa and 185 of 535 (34.6%) had histologic evidence of adenocarcinoma. Overall fragmentation rate was 157 of 535 (29.3%). Lowest fragmentation rate was seen when 1 core was submitted per jar regardless of mounting method (31 of 226; 14% for single versus 126 of 309; 41% for >1 per jar; P < .001). For 1 Telfa-mounted core, rate of fragmentation was 5 of 18 (27.8%) versus 26 of 203 (12.8%) when unmounted (P = .24). Significant increase in fragmentation of Telfa-mounted cores was seen when there were 3 per jar (32 of 70; 46% mounted fragmented versus 9 of 47; 19% unmounted fragmented specimens; P = .01).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS.—\nSubmission of >1 biopsy core per jar and use of Telfa for mounting are associated with increased fragmentation. We recommend limiting submission to 1 core per jar and avoid mounting on Telfa pads.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"115 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Fragmentation of Prostate Core Biopsies Inevitable? A Quality Improvement Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Krithika Shenoy, Richard J. Cote, Gayathri Kini, Mary Anthes-Bartlow, Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2023-0492-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT.—\\nCore biopsies are standard of care for diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. Fragmentation makes numeric assessment of cancer challenging and increases risk of inaccurate staging with direct implications on management.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE.—\\nTo determine factors responsible for fragmentation at our institution.\\n\\n\\nDESIGN.—\\nProstate core biopsies performed at 2 hospital sites during 1 week were prospectively identified. Biopsies were received in multipart formalin jars, either mounted on a nonadherent dressing pad (Telfa, Medtronic Inc) or freely suspended, and grossed by experienced pathologists' assistants. Fragmentation was defined as the difference between number of cores sent by the clinician and number of cores counted by the pathologist on microscopy.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS.—\\nForty-six cases (15 benign; 31 malignant) with 535 specimen jars were identified of which 309 of 535 (57.8%) had >1 biopsy core per jar; 230 of 535 (43%) were received mounted on Telfa and 185 of 535 (34.6%) had histologic evidence of adenocarcinoma. Overall fragmentation rate was 157 of 535 (29.3%). Lowest fragmentation rate was seen when 1 core was submitted per jar regardless of mounting method (31 of 226; 14% for single versus 126 of 309; 41% for >1 per jar; P < .001). For 1 Telfa-mounted core, rate of fragmentation was 5 of 18 (27.8%) versus 26 of 203 (12.8%) when unmounted (P = .24). Significant increase in fragmentation of Telfa-mounted cores was seen when there were 3 per jar (32 of 70; 46% mounted fragmented versus 9 of 47; 19% unmounted fragmented specimens; P = .01).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS.—\\nSubmission of >1 biopsy core per jar and use of Telfa for mounting are associated with increased fragmentation. We recommend limiting submission to 1 core per jar and avoid mounting on Telfa pads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":\"115 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0492-OA\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0492-OA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Fragmentation of Prostate Core Biopsies Inevitable? A Quality Improvement Initiative.
CONTEXT.—
Core biopsies are standard of care for diagnosis and surveillance of prostate cancer. Fragmentation makes numeric assessment of cancer challenging and increases risk of inaccurate staging with direct implications on management.
OBJECTIVE.—
To determine factors responsible for fragmentation at our institution.
DESIGN.—
Prostate core biopsies performed at 2 hospital sites during 1 week were prospectively identified. Biopsies were received in multipart formalin jars, either mounted on a nonadherent dressing pad (Telfa, Medtronic Inc) or freely suspended, and grossed by experienced pathologists' assistants. Fragmentation was defined as the difference between number of cores sent by the clinician and number of cores counted by the pathologist on microscopy.
RESULTS.—
Forty-six cases (15 benign; 31 malignant) with 535 specimen jars were identified of which 309 of 535 (57.8%) had >1 biopsy core per jar; 230 of 535 (43%) were received mounted on Telfa and 185 of 535 (34.6%) had histologic evidence of adenocarcinoma. Overall fragmentation rate was 157 of 535 (29.3%). Lowest fragmentation rate was seen when 1 core was submitted per jar regardless of mounting method (31 of 226; 14% for single versus 126 of 309; 41% for >1 per jar; P < .001). For 1 Telfa-mounted core, rate of fragmentation was 5 of 18 (27.8%) versus 26 of 203 (12.8%) when unmounted (P = .24). Significant increase in fragmentation of Telfa-mounted cores was seen when there were 3 per jar (32 of 70; 46% mounted fragmented versus 9 of 47; 19% unmounted fragmented specimens; P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS.—
Submission of >1 biopsy core per jar and use of Telfa for mounting are associated with increased fragmentation. We recommend limiting submission to 1 core per jar and avoid mounting on Telfa pads.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric.
Indexed/Abstracted:
Web of Science SCIE
Scopus
CAS
INSPEC
Portico