{"title":"感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病孕妇的中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率和血小板-淋巴细胞比率","authors":"Lebechukwu, B.C., Mbachu, N.A., Eleje, G.U., Orji, E. C., Obiegbu, N.P., Umennadi, R.O","doi":"10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic inflammation, a factor for high mortality, persists throughout the pregnancy period of women living with human immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). \nAim: To determine whether pregnancy alone or the combined effects of HIV and pregnancy are the sources of the inflammation, this study evaluated the predictive variables for inflammation, lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR). \nMaterials and Methods: A population of 128 women, aged 15-49 years were grouped into 4; Group A- 32 HIV positive and pregnant, Group B- 32 HIV negative and pregnant, Group C- 32 HIV positive not pregnant, Group D- 32 HIV negative not pregnant (control group). Differential white blood cell and platelet count methods were used to determine the neutrophil (N), Lymphocyte (L) and platelet (P) counts. The ratio calculation method was used to derive the NLR and PLR. \nResults: NLR was significantly higher for group A (2.62±0.41) compared to groups B (2.25 ± 0.18); C (0.95 ± 0.07); D (1.68 ± 0.19) at p ≤ 0.00. However, the NLR of groups A and B (p ≤ 0.05) were not significantly different, PLR was significantly higher for group A (9.86±1.12) compared to groups B (6.65 ± 1.12); C (5.35 ± 0.47); D (6.34 ± 0.43). There was no significant difference in blood pressure across the groups, significant difference was however observed in their Body Mass Index. \nConclusion: Hence, Inflammation may have been caused by pregnancy alone.","PeriodicalId":8498,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":"63 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrophil-lymphocyte and Platelet-lymphocyte Ratios of Pregnant Women Living with HIV/AIDS\",\"authors\":\"Lebechukwu, B.C., Mbachu, N.A., Eleje, G.U., Orji, E. C., Obiegbu, N.P., Umennadi, R.O\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Chronic inflammation, a factor for high mortality, persists throughout the pregnancy period of women living with human immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). \\nAim: To determine whether pregnancy alone or the combined effects of HIV and pregnancy are the sources of the inflammation, this study evaluated the predictive variables for inflammation, lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR). \\nMaterials and Methods: A population of 128 women, aged 15-49 years were grouped into 4; Group A- 32 HIV positive and pregnant, Group B- 32 HIV negative and pregnant, Group C- 32 HIV positive not pregnant, Group D- 32 HIV negative not pregnant (control group). Differential white blood cell and platelet count methods were used to determine the neutrophil (N), Lymphocyte (L) and platelet (P) counts. The ratio calculation method was used to derive the NLR and PLR. \\nResults: NLR was significantly higher for group A (2.62±0.41) compared to groups B (2.25 ± 0.18); C (0.95 ± 0.07); D (1.68 ± 0.19) at p ≤ 0.00. However, the NLR of groups A and B (p ≤ 0.05) were not significantly different, PLR was significantly higher for group A (9.86±1.12) compared to groups B (6.65 ± 1.12); C (5.35 ± 0.47); D (6.34 ± 0.43). There was no significant difference in blood pressure across the groups, significant difference was however observed in their Body Mass Index. \\nConclusion: Hence, Inflammation may have been caused by pregnancy alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajbgmb/2024/v16i5376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性炎症是导致高死亡率的一个因素,感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的妇女在整个孕期都存在慢性炎症。目的:为了确定是妊娠本身还是 HIV 和妊娠的共同作用导致了炎症,本研究评估了炎症、淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)的预测变量。材料与方法将 128 名 15-49 岁的女性分为 4 组:A 组--32 名 HIV 阳性且怀孕;B 组--32 名 HIV 阴性且怀孕;C 组--32 名 HIV 阳性未怀孕;D 组--32 名 HIV 阴性未怀孕(对照组)。采用白细胞和血小板计数差法测定中性粒细胞(N)、淋巴细胞(L)和血小板(P)计数。采用比值计算法得出 NLR 和 PLR。结果A 组(2.62±0.41)的 NLR 明显高于 B 组(2.25±0.18)、C 组(0.95±0.07)和 D 组(1.68±0.19),P≤0.00。然而,A 组和 B 组的 NLR(p ≤ 0.05)无显著差异,A 组的 PLR(9.86±1.12)显著高于 B 组(6.65±1.12);C 组(5.35±0.47);D 组(6.34±0.43)。各组的血压没有明显差异,但体重指数有明显差异。结论因此,炎症可能仅由妊娠引起。
Neutrophil-lymphocyte and Platelet-lymphocyte Ratios of Pregnant Women Living with HIV/AIDS
Background: Chronic inflammation, a factor for high mortality, persists throughout the pregnancy period of women living with human immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
Aim: To determine whether pregnancy alone or the combined effects of HIV and pregnancy are the sources of the inflammation, this study evaluated the predictive variables for inflammation, lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR).
Materials and Methods: A population of 128 women, aged 15-49 years were grouped into 4; Group A- 32 HIV positive and pregnant, Group B- 32 HIV negative and pregnant, Group C- 32 HIV positive not pregnant, Group D- 32 HIV negative not pregnant (control group). Differential white blood cell and platelet count methods were used to determine the neutrophil (N), Lymphocyte (L) and platelet (P) counts. The ratio calculation method was used to derive the NLR and PLR.
Results: NLR was significantly higher for group A (2.62±0.41) compared to groups B (2.25 ± 0.18); C (0.95 ± 0.07); D (1.68 ± 0.19) at p ≤ 0.00. However, the NLR of groups A and B (p ≤ 0.05) were not significantly different, PLR was significantly higher for group A (9.86±1.12) compared to groups B (6.65 ± 1.12); C (5.35 ± 0.47); D (6.34 ± 0.43). There was no significant difference in blood pressure across the groups, significant difference was however observed in their Body Mass Index.
Conclusion: Hence, Inflammation may have been caused by pregnancy alone.