L. Abdulaal, A. Maiter, M. Salehi, M. Sharkey, T. Alnasser, Pankaj Garg, S. Rajaram, C. Hill, Christopher Johns, Alex Rothman, K. Dwivedi, D. Kiely, S. Alabed, Andrew J Swift
{"title":"针对 CT 肺血管造影检查慢性肺栓塞的人工智能工具的系统性综述","authors":"L. Abdulaal, A. Maiter, M. Salehi, M. Sharkey, T. Alnasser, Pankaj Garg, S. Rajaram, C. Hill, Christopher Johns, Alex Rothman, K. Dwivedi, D. Kiely, S. Alabed, Andrew J Swift","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2024.1335349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Chronic pulmonary embolism (PE) may result in pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Automated CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) interpretation using artificial intelligence (AI) tools has the potential for improving diagnostic accuracy, reducing delays to diagnosis and yielding novel information of clinical value in CTEPH. This systematic review aimed to identify and appraise existing studies presenting AI tools for CTPA in the context of chronic PE and CTEPH. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched on 11 September 2023. Journal publications presenting AI tools for CTPA in patients with chronic PE or CTEPH were eligible for inclusion. Information about model design, training and testing was extracted. Study quality was assessed using compliance with the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). Results Five studies were eligible for inclusion, all of which presented deep learning AI models to evaluate PE. First study evaluated the lung parenchymal changes in chronic PE and two studies used an AI model to classify PE, with none directly assessing the pulmonary arteries. In addition, a separate study developed a CNN tool to distinguish chronic PE using 2D maximum intensity projection reconstructions. While another study assessed a novel automated approach to quantify hypoperfusion to help in the severity assessment of CTEPH. While descriptions of model design and training were reliable, descriptions of the datasets used in training and testing were more inconsistent. Conclusion In contrast to AI tools for evaluation of acute PE, there has been limited investigation of AI-based approaches to characterising chronic PE and CTEPH on CTPA. Existing studies are limited by inconsistent reporting of the data used to train and test their models. This systematic review highlights an area of potential expansion for the field of AI in medical image interpretation. There is limited knowledge of A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism in CT. This systematic review provides an assessment on research that examined deep learning algorithms in detecting CTEPH on CTPA images, the number of studies assessing the utility of deep learning on CTPA in CTEPH was unclear and should be highlighted.","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism on CT pulmonary angiography\",\"authors\":\"L. Abdulaal, A. Maiter, M. Salehi, M. Sharkey, T. Alnasser, Pankaj Garg, S. Rajaram, C. Hill, Christopher Johns, Alex Rothman, K. Dwivedi, D. Kiely, S. Alabed, Andrew J Swift\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fradi.2024.1335349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Chronic pulmonary embolism (PE) may result in pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Automated CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) interpretation using artificial intelligence (AI) tools has the potential for improving diagnostic accuracy, reducing delays to diagnosis and yielding novel information of clinical value in CTEPH. This systematic review aimed to identify and appraise existing studies presenting AI tools for CTPA in the context of chronic PE and CTEPH. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched on 11 September 2023. Journal publications presenting AI tools for CTPA in patients with chronic PE or CTEPH were eligible for inclusion. Information about model design, training and testing was extracted. Study quality was assessed using compliance with the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). Results Five studies were eligible for inclusion, all of which presented deep learning AI models to evaluate PE. First study evaluated the lung parenchymal changes in chronic PE and two studies used an AI model to classify PE, with none directly assessing the pulmonary arteries. In addition, a separate study developed a CNN tool to distinguish chronic PE using 2D maximum intensity projection reconstructions. While another study assessed a novel automated approach to quantify hypoperfusion to help in the severity assessment of CTEPH. While descriptions of model design and training were reliable, descriptions of the datasets used in training and testing were more inconsistent. Conclusion In contrast to AI tools for evaluation of acute PE, there has been limited investigation of AI-based approaches to characterising chronic PE and CTEPH on CTPA. Existing studies are limited by inconsistent reporting of the data used to train and test their models. This systematic review highlights an area of potential expansion for the field of AI in medical image interpretation. There is limited knowledge of A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism in CT. This systematic review provides an assessment on research that examined deep learning algorithms in detecting CTEPH on CTPA images, the number of studies assessing the utility of deep learning on CTPA in CTEPH was unclear and should be highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1335349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1335349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 慢性肺栓塞(PE)可能导致肺动脉高压(CTEPH)。使用人工智能(AI)工具对 CT 肺血管造影(CTPA)进行自动判读有可能提高诊断准确性、减少诊断延误并获得对 CTEPH 有临床价值的新信息。本系统性综述旨在识别和评估在慢性 PE 和 CTEPH 中使用 CTPA 人工智能工具的现有研究。方法 2023 年 9 月 11 日检索了 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库。符合纳入条件的期刊论文介绍了用于慢性 PE 或 CTEPH 患者 CTPA 的人工智能工具。提取了有关模型设计、训练和测试的信息。根据医学影像人工智能检查表(CLAIM)对研究质量进行评估。结果 有五项研究符合纳入条件,所有这些研究都采用了深度学习人工智能模型来评估肺栓塞。第一项研究评估了慢性 PE 的肺实质变化,两项研究使用人工智能模型对 PE 进行分类,但没有一项研究直接评估肺动脉。此外,另一项研究开发了一种 CNN 工具,利用二维最大强度投影重建来区分慢性 PE。而另一项研究则评估了一种量化低灌注的新型自动方法,以帮助评估 CTEPH 的严重程度。虽然对模型设计和训练的描述是可靠的,但对训练和测试所用数据集的描述却不一致。结论 与评估急性 PE 的人工智能工具不同,基于人工智能的方法对 CTPA 中慢性 PE 和 CTEPH 特征的研究还很有限。现有的研究受到用于训练和测试其模型的数据报告不一致的限制。本系统综述强调了人工智能在医学影像解读领域的潜在扩展领域。对 CT 中慢性肺栓塞人工智能工具的系统综述了解有限。本系统性综述对深度学习算法在 CTPA 图像上检测 CTEPH 的研究进行了评估,但评估深度学习在 CTEPH CTPA 上的实用性的研究数量并不明确,应予以强调。
A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism on CT pulmonary angiography
Background Chronic pulmonary embolism (PE) may result in pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Automated CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) interpretation using artificial intelligence (AI) tools has the potential for improving diagnostic accuracy, reducing delays to diagnosis and yielding novel information of clinical value in CTEPH. This systematic review aimed to identify and appraise existing studies presenting AI tools for CTPA in the context of chronic PE and CTEPH. Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched on 11 September 2023. Journal publications presenting AI tools for CTPA in patients with chronic PE or CTEPH were eligible for inclusion. Information about model design, training and testing was extracted. Study quality was assessed using compliance with the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). Results Five studies were eligible for inclusion, all of which presented deep learning AI models to evaluate PE. First study evaluated the lung parenchymal changes in chronic PE and two studies used an AI model to classify PE, with none directly assessing the pulmonary arteries. In addition, a separate study developed a CNN tool to distinguish chronic PE using 2D maximum intensity projection reconstructions. While another study assessed a novel automated approach to quantify hypoperfusion to help in the severity assessment of CTEPH. While descriptions of model design and training were reliable, descriptions of the datasets used in training and testing were more inconsistent. Conclusion In contrast to AI tools for evaluation of acute PE, there has been limited investigation of AI-based approaches to characterising chronic PE and CTEPH on CTPA. Existing studies are limited by inconsistent reporting of the data used to train and test their models. This systematic review highlights an area of potential expansion for the field of AI in medical image interpretation. There is limited knowledge of A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism in CT. This systematic review provides an assessment on research that examined deep learning algorithms in detecting CTEPH on CTPA images, the number of studies assessing the utility of deep learning on CTPA in CTEPH was unclear and should be highlighted.