利用具有洞察力的公司治理实践提高银行的可持续性:对一个新兴经济体的定性调查

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
David Kofi Wuaku, Samuel Koomson, Ernest Mensah Abraham, Ummu Markwei, Joan-Ark Manu Agyapong
{"title":"利用具有洞察力的公司治理实践提高银行的可持续性:对一个新兴经济体的定性调查","authors":"David Kofi Wuaku, Samuel Koomson, Ernest Mensah Abraham, Ummu Markwei, Joan-Ark Manu Agyapong","doi":"10.1108/jgr-10-2023-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nIn the past few years, researchers across the world have been attracted to corporate governance (CG) and sustainability studies in the banking space. However, inconsistencies remain, which have created a lack of alignment in existing research. To address this problem, this paper aims to re-examines the CG–bank sustainability relationship using a qualitative design, which has been underused in the field, to generate in-depth, useful and novel analysis and insights that may hide behind the numbers.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA qualitative inquiry was conducted using key informants in Ghana’s banking industry. This study made use of purposive and snowball sampling techniques, an interview guide and the thematic approach to qualitative data analysis.\n\nFindings\nFirstly, this research finds that while larger boards do not promote bank sustainability, those who are independent and have diversified expertise and experiences do. Secondly, CEO duality can boost bank sustainability only if the CEO is actively engaged and performing. Thirdly, this study finds that foreign-owned and managed banks make more profits only if they have good knowledge of the local market.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research makes the call that upcoming researchers should replicate this research in other banking settings worldwide to validate the results.\n\nPractical implications\nPractical lessons for local and foreign-owned banks and their shareholders are discussed to advance the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 8.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research shares novel insights that offer clarity to the literature and move the CG and sustainability fields forward.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the sustainability of banks using insightful corporate governance practices: a qualitative inquiry in an emerging economy\",\"authors\":\"David Kofi Wuaku, Samuel Koomson, Ernest Mensah Abraham, Ummu Markwei, Joan-Ark Manu Agyapong\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jgr-10-2023-0164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nIn the past few years, researchers across the world have been attracted to corporate governance (CG) and sustainability studies in the banking space. However, inconsistencies remain, which have created a lack of alignment in existing research. To address this problem, this paper aims to re-examines the CG–bank sustainability relationship using a qualitative design, which has been underused in the field, to generate in-depth, useful and novel analysis and insights that may hide behind the numbers.\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA qualitative inquiry was conducted using key informants in Ghana’s banking industry. This study made use of purposive and snowball sampling techniques, an interview guide and the thematic approach to qualitative data analysis.\\n\\nFindings\\nFirstly, this research finds that while larger boards do not promote bank sustainability, those who are independent and have diversified expertise and experiences do. Secondly, CEO duality can boost bank sustainability only if the CEO is actively engaged and performing. Thirdly, this study finds that foreign-owned and managed banks make more profits only if they have good knowledge of the local market.\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis research makes the call that upcoming researchers should replicate this research in other banking settings worldwide to validate the results.\\n\\nPractical implications\\nPractical lessons for local and foreign-owned banks and their shareholders are discussed to advance the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 8.\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research shares novel insights that offer clarity to the literature and move the CG and sustainability fields forward.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-10-2023-0164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-10-2023-0164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在过去几年中,世界各地的研究人员都被银行业的公司治理和可持续发展研究所吸引。然而,研究中仍存在不一致之处,导致现有研究缺乏一致性。为解决这一问题,本文旨在采用定性设计来重新审视企业管治与银行可持续发展之间的关系,这种设计在该领域一直未得到充分利用,本文希望通过这种设计来产生可能隐藏在数字背后的深入、有用和新颖的分析与见解。本研究采用了目的性抽样和滚雪球抽样技术、访谈指南和专题方法进行定性数据分析。研究结果首先,本研究发现,虽然规模较大的董事会并不能促进银行的可持续发展,但那些独立的、拥有多元化专业知识和经验的董事会却能促进银行的可持续发展。其次,只有当首席执行官积极参与并履行职责时,首席执行官双重身份才能促进银行的可持续发展。第三,本研究发现,只有当外资银行对当地市场非常了解时,外资银行和外资管理银行才能获得更多利润。本研究呼吁未来的研究人员应在全球其他银行业环境中复制本研究,以验证研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the sustainability of banks using insightful corporate governance practices: a qualitative inquiry in an emerging economy
Purpose In the past few years, researchers across the world have been attracted to corporate governance (CG) and sustainability studies in the banking space. However, inconsistencies remain, which have created a lack of alignment in existing research. To address this problem, this paper aims to re-examines the CG–bank sustainability relationship using a qualitative design, which has been underused in the field, to generate in-depth, useful and novel analysis and insights that may hide behind the numbers. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative inquiry was conducted using key informants in Ghana’s banking industry. This study made use of purposive and snowball sampling techniques, an interview guide and the thematic approach to qualitative data analysis. Findings Firstly, this research finds that while larger boards do not promote bank sustainability, those who are independent and have diversified expertise and experiences do. Secondly, CEO duality can boost bank sustainability only if the CEO is actively engaged and performing. Thirdly, this study finds that foreign-owned and managed banks make more profits only if they have good knowledge of the local market. Research limitations/implications This research makes the call that upcoming researchers should replicate this research in other banking settings worldwide to validate the results. Practical implications Practical lessons for local and foreign-owned banks and their shareholders are discussed to advance the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 8. Originality/value This research shares novel insights that offer clarity to the literature and move the CG and sustainability fields forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信