{"title":"斯泰恩河冲击结构内冲击脉形成的压力-温度-时间控制因素","authors":"Randy G. Hopkins, John. G. Spray, Erin L. Walton","doi":"10.1111/maps.14168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Thermodynamic modeling has been applied to determine pressure–temperature–time conditions leading to shock vein formation during the passage of a natural shock wave generated by hypervelocity impact. The approach is novel in considering both shock front and rarefaction pressures, as well as simultaneously forming and cooling the shock veins via two-dimensional steady-state conduction. Model results are tested using shock veins developed in granitic rocks that constitute the central uplift of the Steen River impact structure in Canada. Here, two variants of majoritic garnet were generated in different settings: (1) along the margins of shock veins due to pargasite and biotite breakdown (accompanied by maskelynite formation), and (2) within the originally molten shock vein matrix as newly grown crystals. We determine that during shock vein formation, the shock front pressure and wave width at the reconstructed sample location were 18 GPa and 830 m, respectively, with a dwell time of 160 ms. Intra-vein melting at 2150°C was attained within 1 μs. Melt cooled to the solidus in 150 ms following shock front passage. Majoritic garnet formation was facilitated by the high temperatures realized within the veins as a result of frictional melting that accompanied shock loading. The calculated pressure–temperature–time (<i>P</i>–<i>T</i>–<i>t</i>) path provides constraints on the formation conditions of majoritic garnet at Steen River. The model results independently support previously determined <i>P</i>–<i>T</i> conditions based on mineral stability fields. The vein margin garnets (35–39 mole% majorite) and maskelynite formed first under higher <i>P</i>–<i>T</i> conditions for a longer duration (36 ms). The matrix garnets (11–22 mole% majorite) crystallized from melt under lower <i>P</i>–<i>T</i> conditions and for a shorter duration (22 ms). Our results indicate that shock pressure alone should not be used as a basis for shock classification. Instead, the interplay between pressure and temperature with time and the duration of shock immersion (dwell) must be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":18555,"journal":{"name":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","volume":"59 7","pages":"1546-1558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14168","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure–temperature–time controls on shock vein formation within the Steen River impact structure\",\"authors\":\"Randy G. Hopkins, John. G. Spray, Erin L. Walton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/maps.14168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Thermodynamic modeling has been applied to determine pressure–temperature–time conditions leading to shock vein formation during the passage of a natural shock wave generated by hypervelocity impact. The approach is novel in considering both shock front and rarefaction pressures, as well as simultaneously forming and cooling the shock veins via two-dimensional steady-state conduction. Model results are tested using shock veins developed in granitic rocks that constitute the central uplift of the Steen River impact structure in Canada. Here, two variants of majoritic garnet were generated in different settings: (1) along the margins of shock veins due to pargasite and biotite breakdown (accompanied by maskelynite formation), and (2) within the originally molten shock vein matrix as newly grown crystals. We determine that during shock vein formation, the shock front pressure and wave width at the reconstructed sample location were 18 GPa and 830 m, respectively, with a dwell time of 160 ms. Intra-vein melting at 2150°C was attained within 1 μs. Melt cooled to the solidus in 150 ms following shock front passage. Majoritic garnet formation was facilitated by the high temperatures realized within the veins as a result of frictional melting that accompanied shock loading. The calculated pressure–temperature–time (<i>P</i>–<i>T</i>–<i>t</i>) path provides constraints on the formation conditions of majoritic garnet at Steen River. The model results independently support previously determined <i>P</i>–<i>T</i> conditions based on mineral stability fields. The vein margin garnets (35–39 mole% majorite) and maskelynite formed first under higher <i>P</i>–<i>T</i> conditions for a longer duration (36 ms). The matrix garnets (11–22 mole% majorite) crystallized from melt under lower <i>P</i>–<i>T</i> conditions and for a shorter duration (22 ms). Our results indicate that shock pressure alone should not be used as a basis for shock classification. Instead, the interplay between pressure and temperature with time and the duration of shock immersion (dwell) must be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"volume\":\"59 7\",\"pages\":\"1546-1558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14168\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pressure–temperature–time controls on shock vein formation within the Steen River impact structure
Thermodynamic modeling has been applied to determine pressure–temperature–time conditions leading to shock vein formation during the passage of a natural shock wave generated by hypervelocity impact. The approach is novel in considering both shock front and rarefaction pressures, as well as simultaneously forming and cooling the shock veins via two-dimensional steady-state conduction. Model results are tested using shock veins developed in granitic rocks that constitute the central uplift of the Steen River impact structure in Canada. Here, two variants of majoritic garnet were generated in different settings: (1) along the margins of shock veins due to pargasite and biotite breakdown (accompanied by maskelynite formation), and (2) within the originally molten shock vein matrix as newly grown crystals. We determine that during shock vein formation, the shock front pressure and wave width at the reconstructed sample location were 18 GPa and 830 m, respectively, with a dwell time of 160 ms. Intra-vein melting at 2150°C was attained within 1 μs. Melt cooled to the solidus in 150 ms following shock front passage. Majoritic garnet formation was facilitated by the high temperatures realized within the veins as a result of frictional melting that accompanied shock loading. The calculated pressure–temperature–time (P–T–t) path provides constraints on the formation conditions of majoritic garnet at Steen River. The model results independently support previously determined P–T conditions based on mineral stability fields. The vein margin garnets (35–39 mole% majorite) and maskelynite formed first under higher P–T conditions for a longer duration (36 ms). The matrix garnets (11–22 mole% majorite) crystallized from melt under lower P–T conditions and for a shorter duration (22 ms). Our results indicate that shock pressure alone should not be used as a basis for shock classification. Instead, the interplay between pressure and temperature with time and the duration of shock immersion (dwell) must be considered.
期刊介绍:
First issued in 1953, the journal publishes research articles describing the latest results of new studies, invited reviews of major topics in planetary science, editorials on issues of current interest in the field, and book reviews. The publications are original, not considered for publication elsewhere, and undergo peer-review. The topics include the origin and history of the solar system, planets and natural satellites, interplanetary dust and interstellar medium, lunar samples, meteors, and meteorites, asteroids, comets, craters, and tektites. Our authors and editors are professional scientists representing numerous disciplines, including astronomy, astrophysics, physics, geophysics, chemistry, isotope geochemistry, mineralogy, earth science, geology, and biology. MAPS has subscribers in over 40 countries. Fifty percent of MAPS'' readers are based outside the USA. The journal is available in hard copy and online.