驱逐主义:解决堕胎争议的唯一折中方案

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Walter E. Block
{"title":"驱逐主义:解决堕胎争议的唯一折中方案","authors":"Walter E. Block","doi":"10.12775/szhf.2024.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important philosophical debates now tearing our nation apart is the one concerning abortion. In this matter, there can be little controversy. The present paper is an attempt to patch up this matter by offering a compromise solution, that gives each side, pro-choice and pro-life, half a loaf. Moreover, it is a principled compromise, not merely adding up the two sides and dividing them equally. No cutting babies in half, here.","PeriodicalId":32293,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Historii Filozofii","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evictionism: the only compromise solution to the abortion controversy\",\"authors\":\"Walter E. Block\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/szhf.2024.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most important philosophical debates now tearing our nation apart is the one concerning abortion. In this matter, there can be little controversy. The present paper is an attempt to patch up this matter by offering a compromise solution, that gives each side, pro-choice and pro-life, half a loaf. Moreover, it is a principled compromise, not merely adding up the two sides and dividing them equally. No cutting babies in half, here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia z Historii Filozofii\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia z Historii Filozofii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2024.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Historii Filozofii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2024.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前撕裂我们国家的最重要的哲学辩论之一就是关于堕胎的辩论。在这个问题上,几乎不存在争议。本文试图通过提供一个折中方案来修补这一问题,让支持堕胎和支持生命的双方各得一半。此外,这是一个有原则的折衷方案,而不仅仅是把双方加起来平分。在这里,不能把婴儿切成两半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evictionism: the only compromise solution to the abortion controversy
One of the most important philosophical debates now tearing our nation apart is the one concerning abortion. In this matter, there can be little controversy. The present paper is an attempt to patch up this matter by offering a compromise solution, that gives each side, pro-choice and pro-life, half a loaf. Moreover, it is a principled compromise, not merely adding up the two sides and dividing them equally. No cutting babies in half, here.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia z Historii Filozofii
Studia z Historii Filozofii Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信