Gena Nelson, Derek B. Kosty, Jessica Turtura, Christian T. Doabler, Benjamin Clarke
{"title":"评估用于识别幼儿园数学风险的门控筛查方法。","authors":"Gena Nelson, Derek B. Kosty, Jessica Turtura, Christian T. Doabler, Benjamin Clarke","doi":"10.1037/spq0000630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of different universal screening approaches for identifying mathematics difficulties in kindergarteners. We used extant data from 2,010 kindergarten students from 23 schools across two states. First, we identified the diagnostic accuracy of two individual screeners: (a) a set of three curriculum-based measures (CBM) and (b) a diagnostic measure, the Number Sense Brief (NSB). Then, we determined the diagnostic accuracy of a gated screening approach considering both the CBM and NSB. The criterion measure was a norm-referenced mathematics achievement test. The results indicated that area under the curve values met or exceeded .80 for both individual screeners; however, the number of false positives was high. The gated screening approach yielded fewer false positives at the expense of increasing false negatives. Directions for future research and the practical implications of the results for screening in kindergarten mathematics are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":44991,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a gated screening approach for identifying risk in kindergarten mathematics.\",\"authors\":\"Gena Nelson, Derek B. Kosty, Jessica Turtura, Christian T. Doabler, Benjamin Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/spq0000630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of different universal screening approaches for identifying mathematics difficulties in kindergarteners. We used extant data from 2,010 kindergarten students from 23 schools across two states. First, we identified the diagnostic accuracy of two individual screeners: (a) a set of three curriculum-based measures (CBM) and (b) a diagnostic measure, the Number Sense Brief (NSB). Then, we determined the diagnostic accuracy of a gated screening approach considering both the CBM and NSB. The criterion measure was a norm-referenced mathematics achievement test. The results indicated that area under the curve values met or exceeded .80 for both individual screeners; however, the number of false positives was high. The gated screening approach yielded fewer false positives at the expense of increasing false negatives. Directions for future research and the practical implications of the results for screening in kindergarten mathematics are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000630\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000630","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在考察不同的通用筛查方法在识别幼儿园学生数学困难方面的诊断准确性。我们使用了来自两个州 23 所学校 2 010 名幼儿园学生的现有数据。首先,我们确定了两种个别筛查方法的诊断准确性:(a) 一套基于课程的三项测量(CBM)和 (b) 一项诊断测量--数感简测(NSB)。然后,我们确定了一种同时考虑 CBM 和 NSB 的筛选方法的诊断准确性。标准测量是常模参照数学成绩测验。结果表明,两种筛查方法的曲线下面积值都达到或超过了 0.80;然而,假阳性的数量却很高。有门筛查法的假阳性人数较少,但假阴性人数却有所增加。本文讨论了未来研究的方向以及研究结果对幼儿园数学筛查的实际意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
Evaluating a gated screening approach for identifying risk in kindergarten mathematics.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of different universal screening approaches for identifying mathematics difficulties in kindergarteners. We used extant data from 2,010 kindergarten students from 23 schools across two states. First, we identified the diagnostic accuracy of two individual screeners: (a) a set of three curriculum-based measures (CBM) and (b) a diagnostic measure, the Number Sense Brief (NSB). Then, we determined the diagnostic accuracy of a gated screening approach considering both the CBM and NSB. The criterion measure was a norm-referenced mathematics achievement test. The results indicated that area under the curve values met or exceeded .80 for both individual screeners; however, the number of false positives was high. The gated screening approach yielded fewer false positives at the expense of increasing false negatives. Directions for future research and the practical implications of the results for screening in kindergarten mathematics are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).