专门针对 COVID-19 患者的家庭护理模式:威尼托大区(意大利)地方卫生区的经验。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Silvia Manea, Marco Pinato, Laura Salmaso, S. Vittorii, Michela Biasio, Matteo Rigoni, Vinicio Manfrin, Elisabetta Bertocco, Mirko Zanatta, Mario Saia
{"title":"专门针对 COVID-19 患者的家庭护理模式:威尼托大区(意大利)地方卫生区的经验。","authors":"Silvia Manea, Marco Pinato, Laura Salmaso, S. Vittorii, Michela Biasio, Matteo Rigoni, Vinicio Manfrin, Elisabetta Bertocco, Mirko Zanatta, Mario Saia","doi":"10.7416/ai.2024.2623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nDuring COVID-19 pandemic, health professionals have been working in an extreme uncertainty context. Affected patients needed to be cared at home as long as possible to avoid virus spreading and hospital resources saturation. The Veneto Regional Administration (North-east of Italy) released Regional guidelines about it. The Western Healthcare District of the Local Health Authority of the city of Vicenza (180,000 inhabitants) implemented a healthcare pathway following them. Aim of the study is to describe the results and outcomes of such implementation.\n\n\nMethods\nIn the implemented health care pathway, a new service called \"Special Unit of continuity of care\" (USCA) with physicians and nurses has been dedicated to the prise en charge at home of patients suffering from Sars-CoV-2. They were referred to the USCA by general practitioners or by hospital specialists, and managed through a daily clinical monitoring by regular home visits and phone calls, specialist consultations and therapy management. In order to prevent hospital admission, an oxygen concentrator when possible has been employed and managed at home by the members of the USCA when the oxygen saturation was below 93%. An observational retrospective study has been conducted using anonymized data from different databases: the USCA activity database (from 12/01/20 to 21/31/21), the hospital and Emergency Department discharge databases, and the \"healthcare co-payments exemptions database\". The latter database refers to the people excluded - because of their chronicity - from the co-payment of a list of medical exams and services. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses have been implemented.\n\n\nResults\n1,419 patients suffering from Sars-CoV-2 have been cared and managed by the USCA in the considered period of time (mean 11.4 days), of whom 787 (55.5%) with at least one chronic condition (described in the above quoted \"healthcare co-payments exemption database\") and 261 provided with oxygen concentrator. 275 (19.4%) needed a hospital admission, 39 (2.8%) in intensive unit; 53 died during hospitalization (3.8%). Out of the 261 patients utilizing oxygen concentrator, 103 have been admitted to hospital (39.5%), 7.3% in intensive unit and 8.0% died. In implemented multivariate analyses, the use of oxygen concentrator, proxy measure of the severity of the condition, is the major determinant for the risk of hospital admission (adj OR: 3.2, CI 2.3-4.3) and of dying within 30 days (adj OR: 2.8 CI 1.5-5.1). Among the 261 patients provided with oxygen concentrator, 158 (60,5%) have been managed at home without any admission to emergency department and/or hospitalization.\n\n\nConclusions\nIn an uncertain context such as COVID-19 pandemic, the already-implemented home care model has been modified by integrating the USCA physicians and nurses and specialist care networks to prevent hospitalization and the sense of isolation and abandonment of people as much as possible. Almost 1,500 patients suffering from COVID-19 have been cared for at home over 13 months by such new service with complex and multidisciplinary activities. The risk of hospitalization and death appears determined by the severity of the pathology with high and significant OR 60% of patients with oxygen concentrators who, despite an initial high hyposaturation were not hospitalized, represent, partly, the group of patients who would have been requiring hospital care in the absence of a home care pathway in a standard situation.","PeriodicalId":7999,"journal":{"name":"Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home care models dedicated to COVID-19 patients: the experience of a Local Health District of Veneto Region (Italy).\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Manea, Marco Pinato, Laura Salmaso, S. Vittorii, Michela Biasio, Matteo Rigoni, Vinicio Manfrin, Elisabetta Bertocco, Mirko Zanatta, Mario Saia\",\"doi\":\"10.7416/ai.2024.2623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nDuring COVID-19 pandemic, health professionals have been working in an extreme uncertainty context. Affected patients needed to be cared at home as long as possible to avoid virus spreading and hospital resources saturation. The Veneto Regional Administration (North-east of Italy) released Regional guidelines about it. The Western Healthcare District of the Local Health Authority of the city of Vicenza (180,000 inhabitants) implemented a healthcare pathway following them. Aim of the study is to describe the results and outcomes of such implementation.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nIn the implemented health care pathway, a new service called \\\"Special Unit of continuity of care\\\" (USCA) with physicians and nurses has been dedicated to the prise en charge at home of patients suffering from Sars-CoV-2. They were referred to the USCA by general practitioners or by hospital specialists, and managed through a daily clinical monitoring by regular home visits and phone calls, specialist consultations and therapy management. In order to prevent hospital admission, an oxygen concentrator when possible has been employed and managed at home by the members of the USCA when the oxygen saturation was below 93%. An observational retrospective study has been conducted using anonymized data from different databases: the USCA activity database (from 12/01/20 to 21/31/21), the hospital and Emergency Department discharge databases, and the \\\"healthcare co-payments exemptions database\\\". The latter database refers to the people excluded - because of their chronicity - from the co-payment of a list of medical exams and services. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses have been implemented.\\n\\n\\nResults\\n1,419 patients suffering from Sars-CoV-2 have been cared and managed by the USCA in the considered period of time (mean 11.4 days), of whom 787 (55.5%) with at least one chronic condition (described in the above quoted \\\"healthcare co-payments exemption database\\\") and 261 provided with oxygen concentrator. 275 (19.4%) needed a hospital admission, 39 (2.8%) in intensive unit; 53 died during hospitalization (3.8%). Out of the 261 patients utilizing oxygen concentrator, 103 have been admitted to hospital (39.5%), 7.3% in intensive unit and 8.0% died. In implemented multivariate analyses, the use of oxygen concentrator, proxy measure of the severity of the condition, is the major determinant for the risk of hospital admission (adj OR: 3.2, CI 2.3-4.3) and of dying within 30 days (adj OR: 2.8 CI 1.5-5.1). Among the 261 patients provided with oxygen concentrator, 158 (60,5%) have been managed at home without any admission to emergency department and/or hospitalization.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nIn an uncertain context such as COVID-19 pandemic, the already-implemented home care model has been modified by integrating the USCA physicians and nurses and specialist care networks to prevent hospitalization and the sense of isolation and abandonment of people as much as possible. Almost 1,500 patients suffering from COVID-19 have been cared for at home over 13 months by such new service with complex and multidisciplinary activities. The risk of hospitalization and death appears determined by the severity of the pathology with high and significant OR 60% of patients with oxygen concentrators who, despite an initial high hyposaturation were not hospitalized, represent, partly, the group of patients who would have been requiring hospital care in the absence of a home care pathway in a standard situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2024.2623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2024.2623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医疗专业人员一直在极端不确定的环境中工作。受影响的病人需要尽可能长时间地在家接受治疗,以避免病毒传播和医院资源饱和。威尼托大区政府(意大利东北部)就此发布了大区指南。维琴察市(有 180,000 名居民)地方卫生局的西部医疗保健区按照该指南实施了医疗保健路径。在实施的医疗保健路径中,一项名为 "连续性护理特别小组"(USCA)的新服务专门负责萨斯-CoV-2 患者的家庭护理,该小组由医生和护士组成。这些患者由全科医生或医院专家转介到 USCA,通过定期家访和电话、专家会诊和治疗管理进行日常临床监测。为了避免患者入院,当患者的血氧饱和度低于 93% 时,USCA 成员会尽可能使用制氧机,并在家中进行管理。我们利用不同数据库中的匿名数据开展了一项观察性回顾研究,这些数据库包括:USCA 活动数据库(从 2001 年 1 月 12 日至 2001 年 1 月 21 日)、医院和急诊科出院数据库以及 "医保共付额豁免数据库"。后一个数据库指的是因慢性病而被排除在医疗检查和服务共付额之外的人群。结果1,419 名 Sars-CoV-2 患者在所述期间(平均 11.4 天)接受了 USCA 的护理和管理,其中 787 人(55.5%)至少患有一种慢性病(在上述 "医疗共付额豁免数据库 "中有所描述),261 人配备了氧气浓缩器。275人(19.4%)需要入院治疗,39人(2.8%)住进重症监护室;53人在住院期间死亡(3.8%)。在使用制氧机的 261 名患者中,103 人入院(39.5%),7.3% 入住重症监护室,8.0% 死亡。在实施的多变量分析中,使用制氧机(病情严重程度的替代指标)是入院风险(adj OR:3.2,CI 2.3-4.3)和 30 天内死亡风险(adj OR:2.8,CI 1.5-5.1)的主要决定因素。在 261 名配备了制氧机的患者中,有 158 人(60.5%)在家中接受了治疗,没有进入急诊室和/或住院治疗。 结论在 COVID-19 大流行等不确定的情况下,通过整合 USCA 的医生和护士以及专科护理网络,对已实施的家庭护理模式进行了修改,以尽可能避免住院治疗以及人们的孤立感和被遗弃感。在 13 个月的时间里,近 1500 名 COVID-19 患者在家中得到了这种新服务的照顾,其中包括复杂的多学科活动。住院和死亡的风险似乎取决于病症的严重程度,有60%的患者尽管最初血饱和度较高,但使用制氧机后没有住院治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home care models dedicated to COVID-19 patients: the experience of a Local Health District of Veneto Region (Italy).
Background During COVID-19 pandemic, health professionals have been working in an extreme uncertainty context. Affected patients needed to be cared at home as long as possible to avoid virus spreading and hospital resources saturation. The Veneto Regional Administration (North-east of Italy) released Regional guidelines about it. The Western Healthcare District of the Local Health Authority of the city of Vicenza (180,000 inhabitants) implemented a healthcare pathway following them. Aim of the study is to describe the results and outcomes of such implementation. Methods In the implemented health care pathway, a new service called "Special Unit of continuity of care" (USCA) with physicians and nurses has been dedicated to the prise en charge at home of patients suffering from Sars-CoV-2. They were referred to the USCA by general practitioners or by hospital specialists, and managed through a daily clinical monitoring by regular home visits and phone calls, specialist consultations and therapy management. In order to prevent hospital admission, an oxygen concentrator when possible has been employed and managed at home by the members of the USCA when the oxygen saturation was below 93%. An observational retrospective study has been conducted using anonymized data from different databases: the USCA activity database (from 12/01/20 to 21/31/21), the hospital and Emergency Department discharge databases, and the "healthcare co-payments exemptions database". The latter database refers to the people excluded - because of their chronicity - from the co-payment of a list of medical exams and services. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses have been implemented. Results 1,419 patients suffering from Sars-CoV-2 have been cared and managed by the USCA in the considered period of time (mean 11.4 days), of whom 787 (55.5%) with at least one chronic condition (described in the above quoted "healthcare co-payments exemption database") and 261 provided with oxygen concentrator. 275 (19.4%) needed a hospital admission, 39 (2.8%) in intensive unit; 53 died during hospitalization (3.8%). Out of the 261 patients utilizing oxygen concentrator, 103 have been admitted to hospital (39.5%), 7.3% in intensive unit and 8.0% died. In implemented multivariate analyses, the use of oxygen concentrator, proxy measure of the severity of the condition, is the major determinant for the risk of hospital admission (adj OR: 3.2, CI 2.3-4.3) and of dying within 30 days (adj OR: 2.8 CI 1.5-5.1). Among the 261 patients provided with oxygen concentrator, 158 (60,5%) have been managed at home without any admission to emergency department and/or hospitalization. Conclusions In an uncertain context such as COVID-19 pandemic, the already-implemented home care model has been modified by integrating the USCA physicians and nurses and specialist care networks to prevent hospitalization and the sense of isolation and abandonment of people as much as possible. Almost 1,500 patients suffering from COVID-19 have been cared for at home over 13 months by such new service with complex and multidisciplinary activities. The risk of hospitalization and death appears determined by the severity of the pathology with high and significant OR 60% of patients with oxygen concentrators who, despite an initial high hyposaturation were not hospitalized, represent, partly, the group of patients who would have been requiring hospital care in the absence of a home care pathway in a standard situation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita
Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信