等待奖励对你有好处吗?在一个大型队列样本中,冲动选择、精神病理学和功能结果之间没有关联

JCPP advances Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12231
Patricia P. Bado, Giovanni A. Salum, Luis A. Rohde, Ary Gadelha, Pedro M. Pan, Eurípedes C. Miguel, Gail Tripp, Emi Furukawa
{"title":"等待奖励对你有好处吗?在一个大型队列样本中,冲动选择、精神病理学和功能结果之间没有关联","authors":"Patricia P. Bado,&nbsp;Giovanni A. Salum,&nbsp;Luis A. Rohde,&nbsp;Ary Gadelha,&nbsp;Pedro M. Pan,&nbsp;Eurípedes C. Miguel,&nbsp;Gail Tripp,&nbsp;Emi Furukawa","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A stronger preference for immediate rewards has been reported in individuals with ADHD and other disorders. However, the consistency of the associations between this preference and psychiatric conditions as well as functional outcomes have been questioned. Research on its association with longitudinal outcomes is scarce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The current study used data on a choice delay task (CDT) from a school-based cohort of Brazilian children with those at higher risk for psychiatric disorders over-sampled (<i>n</i> = 1917). The sample included typically developing children (<i>n</i> = 1379), those with ADHD (<i>n</i> = 213), and other disorders. The frequency of the trials where children chose a larger later reward versus a smaller sooner reward was compared for those with ADHD and typically developing children. Cross-sectionally and longitudinally, the study also evaluated whether children's preference for larger delayed rewards at baseline predicted the presence of psychiatric disorders and functional life outcomes (academic performance, alcohol use, early pregnancy, criminal conviction, BMI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Children with ADHD and their typically developing peers performed similarly on the CDT. Their baseline task performance was not related to psychiatric conditions or life outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The current results raise questions regarding the use of the CDT with diverse populations and whether a preference for larger delayed rewards is predictive of positive long-term outcomes as widely assumed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcv2.12231","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is waiting for rewards good for you? No association between impulsive choice, psychopathology, and functional outcomes in a large cohort sample\",\"authors\":\"Patricia P. Bado,&nbsp;Giovanni A. Salum,&nbsp;Luis A. Rohde,&nbsp;Ary Gadelha,&nbsp;Pedro M. Pan,&nbsp;Eurípedes C. Miguel,&nbsp;Gail Tripp,&nbsp;Emi Furukawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcv2.12231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A stronger preference for immediate rewards has been reported in individuals with ADHD and other disorders. However, the consistency of the associations between this preference and psychiatric conditions as well as functional outcomes have been questioned. Research on its association with longitudinal outcomes is scarce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The current study used data on a choice delay task (CDT) from a school-based cohort of Brazilian children with those at higher risk for psychiatric disorders over-sampled (<i>n</i> = 1917). The sample included typically developing children (<i>n</i> = 1379), those with ADHD (<i>n</i> = 213), and other disorders. The frequency of the trials where children chose a larger later reward versus a smaller sooner reward was compared for those with ADHD and typically developing children. Cross-sectionally and longitudinally, the study also evaluated whether children's preference for larger delayed rewards at baseline predicted the presence of psychiatric disorders and functional life outcomes (academic performance, alcohol use, early pregnancy, criminal conviction, BMI).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Children with ADHD and their typically developing peers performed similarly on the CDT. Their baseline task performance was not related to psychiatric conditions or life outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The current results raise questions regarding the use of the CDT with diverse populations and whether a preference for larger delayed rewards is predictive of positive long-term outcomes as widely assumed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCPP advances\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcv2.12231\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCPP advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,多动症和其他疾病患者对即时奖励有更强烈的偏好。然而,这种偏好与精神状况和功能结果之间的关联的一致性一直受到质疑。本研究使用了巴西儿童校本队列中选择延迟任务(CDT)的数据,并对精神障碍高危儿童进行了过度抽样(n = 1917)。样本包括发育正常的儿童(n = 1379)、多动症儿童(n = 213)和其他疾病儿童。对患有多动症的儿童和发育正常的儿童在试验中选择较大的后期奖励和较小的前期奖励的频率进行了比较。该研究还横向和纵向评估了儿童在基线时对较大延迟奖励的偏好是否能预测是否存在精神障碍和生活功能性结果(学习成绩、酗酒、早孕、刑事定罪、体重指数)。目前的研究结果提出了一些问题,如 CDT 在不同人群中的应用,以及对较大延迟奖励的偏好是否如人们普遍认为的那样能预测积极的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is waiting for rewards good for you? No association between impulsive choice, psychopathology, and functional outcomes in a large cohort sample

Is waiting for rewards good for you? No association between impulsive choice, psychopathology, and functional outcomes in a large cohort sample

Background

A stronger preference for immediate rewards has been reported in individuals with ADHD and other disorders. However, the consistency of the associations between this preference and psychiatric conditions as well as functional outcomes have been questioned. Research on its association with longitudinal outcomes is scarce.

Methods

The current study used data on a choice delay task (CDT) from a school-based cohort of Brazilian children with those at higher risk for psychiatric disorders over-sampled (n = 1917). The sample included typically developing children (n = 1379), those with ADHD (n = 213), and other disorders. The frequency of the trials where children chose a larger later reward versus a smaller sooner reward was compared for those with ADHD and typically developing children. Cross-sectionally and longitudinally, the study also evaluated whether children's preference for larger delayed rewards at baseline predicted the presence of psychiatric disorders and functional life outcomes (academic performance, alcohol use, early pregnancy, criminal conviction, BMI).

Results

Children with ADHD and their typically developing peers performed similarly on the CDT. Their baseline task performance was not related to psychiatric conditions or life outcomes.

Conclusions

The current results raise questions regarding the use of the CDT with diverse populations and whether a preference for larger delayed rewards is predictive of positive long-term outcomes as widely assumed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信