大学生学部满意度量表(SADS)的开发与验证:不同性别和专业领域的测量不变性

Eunkyo Jung
{"title":"大学生学部满意度量表(SADS)的开发与验证:不同性别和专业领域的测量不变性","authors":"Eunkyo Jung","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.7.411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aims to develop Satisfaction with Academic Department Scale (SADS) and testing measurement invariance by gender and major field for university students in South Korea. \nMethods The survey dataset of 1,775 students was randomly split into two samples. One of them was used for exploratory factor analysis, and the other one was used for confirmatory factor analysis. \nResults The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated that SADS consisted of four factors (i.e.,‘course satisfaction’, ‘relationship satisfaction’, ‘perception satisfaction’, ‘general satisfaction’). The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the SADS consisted of 4 factors with 20 items in satisfactory model fit indices. Moreover, measurement invariance by gender and major field (humanities⋅social science/natural sciences⋅engineering/ arts⋅physical education) were strictly supported. The internal consistencies of the items for each sub-factor of SADS were also reliable. \nConclusions It is expected that SADS will be useful instrument to measure the satisfaction with academic department for university students regardless of gender and major field. \n","PeriodicalId":414671,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of Satisfaction with Academic Department Scale (SADS) for University Students: Measurement Invariance by Gender and Major Field\",\"authors\":\"Eunkyo Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.7.411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives This study aims to develop Satisfaction with Academic Department Scale (SADS) and testing measurement invariance by gender and major field for university students in South Korea. \\nMethods The survey dataset of 1,775 students was randomly split into two samples. One of them was used for exploratory factor analysis, and the other one was used for confirmatory factor analysis. \\nResults The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated that SADS consisted of four factors (i.e.,‘course satisfaction’, ‘relationship satisfaction’, ‘perception satisfaction’, ‘general satisfaction’). The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the SADS consisted of 4 factors with 20 items in satisfactory model fit indices. Moreover, measurement invariance by gender and major field (humanities⋅social science/natural sciences⋅engineering/ arts⋅physical education) were strictly supported. The internal consistencies of the items for each sub-factor of SADS were also reliable. \\nConclusions It is expected that SADS will be useful instrument to measure the satisfaction with academic department for university students regardless of gender and major field. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":414671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.7.411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.7.411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在编制韩国大学生对学部满意度量表(SADS),并测试不同性别和专业的测量不变性。方法 将 1,775 名学生的调查数据随机分成两个样本。其中一个用于探索性因子分析,另一个用于确认性因子分析。结果 探索性因子分析结果表明,SADS 包含四个因子(即 "课程满意度"、"关系满意度"、"感知满意度 "和 "总体满意度")。确认性因子分析证实,SADS 由 4 个因子和 20 个项目组成,模型拟合指数令人满意。此外,性别和专业领域(人文学科-社会科学/自然科学-工程学/艺术-体育教育)的测量不变性也得到了严格的支持。此外,SADS 各子因子項目的內部一致性也是可靠的。结论 SADS 是测量大学生对学部满意度的有用工具,不论性别和专业领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of Satisfaction with Academic Department Scale (SADS) for University Students: Measurement Invariance by Gender and Major Field
Objectives This study aims to develop Satisfaction with Academic Department Scale (SADS) and testing measurement invariance by gender and major field for university students in South Korea. Methods The survey dataset of 1,775 students was randomly split into two samples. One of them was used for exploratory factor analysis, and the other one was used for confirmatory factor analysis. Results The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated that SADS consisted of four factors (i.e.,‘course satisfaction’, ‘relationship satisfaction’, ‘perception satisfaction’, ‘general satisfaction’). The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the SADS consisted of 4 factors with 20 items in satisfactory model fit indices. Moreover, measurement invariance by gender and major field (humanities⋅social science/natural sciences⋅engineering/ arts⋅physical education) were strictly supported. The internal consistencies of the items for each sub-factor of SADS were also reliable. Conclusions It is expected that SADS will be useful instrument to measure the satisfaction with academic department for university students regardless of gender and major field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信