{"title":"印欧语的分化时间估计","authors":"David Goldstein","doi":"10.1075/dia.22031.gol","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Divergence-time estimation is one of the most important endeavors in historical linguistics. Its importance is\n matched only by its difficulty. As Bayesian methods of divergence-time estimation have become more common over the past two\n decades, a number of critical issues have come to the fore, including model sensitivity, the dependence of root-age estimates on\n uncertain interior-node ages, and the relationship between ancient languages and their modern counterparts. This study addresses\n these issues in an investigation of a particularly fraught case within Indo-European: the diversification of Latin into the\n Romance languages. The results of this study support a gradualist account of their formation that most likely began after 300\n CE. They also bolster the view that Classical Latin is a sampled ancestor of the Romance languages (i.e., it lies\n along the branch leading to the Romance languages).","PeriodicalId":505176,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergence-time estimation in Indo-European\",\"authors\":\"David Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/dia.22031.gol\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Divergence-time estimation is one of the most important endeavors in historical linguistics. Its importance is\\n matched only by its difficulty. As Bayesian methods of divergence-time estimation have become more common over the past two\\n decades, a number of critical issues have come to the fore, including model sensitivity, the dependence of root-age estimates on\\n uncertain interior-node ages, and the relationship between ancient languages and their modern counterparts. This study addresses\\n these issues in an investigation of a particularly fraught case within Indo-European: the diversification of Latin into the\\n Romance languages. The results of this study support a gradualist account of their formation that most likely began after 300\\n CE. They also bolster the view that Classical Latin is a sampled ancestor of the Romance languages (i.e., it lies\\n along the branch leading to the Romance languages).\",\"PeriodicalId\":505176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diachronica\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diachronica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22031.gol\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.22031.gol","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Divergence-time estimation is one of the most important endeavors in historical linguistics. Its importance is
matched only by its difficulty. As Bayesian methods of divergence-time estimation have become more common over the past two
decades, a number of critical issues have come to the fore, including model sensitivity, the dependence of root-age estimates on
uncertain interior-node ages, and the relationship between ancient languages and their modern counterparts. This study addresses
these issues in an investigation of a particularly fraught case within Indo-European: the diversification of Latin into the
Romance languages. The results of this study support a gradualist account of their formation that most likely began after 300
CE. They also bolster the view that Classical Latin is a sampled ancestor of the Romance languages (i.e., it lies
along the branch leading to the Romance languages).