巴拉圭亚松森实现包容性再循环的障碍:公正的过渡?

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Jennifer L. Tucker
{"title":"巴拉圭亚松森实现包容性再循环的障碍:公正的过渡?","authors":"Jennifer L. Tucker","doi":"10.1111/dech.12819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>How can cities upgrade urban waste infrastructures while also supporting the livelihoods of the poor? While development experts now agree that informal recyclers should be included in urban waste systems, many cities struggle to implement inclusive reforms. With a case study of informal recycling in Asunción, Paraguay, which compares dumpsite and street recyclers, this article addresses a gap in the literature by focusing on the policies, politics and frameworks that inhibit the implementation of pro-poor reforms. Proposals to include waste pickers misunderstand key dynamics of informal waste work and locate waste-picker cultures as the key barrier to successful waste-picker integration. However, they overlook the historical production of waste-picker organizing styles and underappreciate the diversity between different groups of informal recyclers. They seek to institute cooperatives, a promising model for segments of highly organized recyclers but one which threatens to exclude a large share of waste pickers who opt to work individually. Successfully integrating informal recyclers into waste management requires significant investments in the sector, meaningfully including waste pickers in proposal design and an epistemic shift to prioritize waste-picker needs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"55 2","pages":"276-301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to Inclusive Recycling in Asunción, Paraguay: A Just Transition?\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L. Tucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dech.12819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>How can cities upgrade urban waste infrastructures while also supporting the livelihoods of the poor? While development experts now agree that informal recyclers should be included in urban waste systems, many cities struggle to implement inclusive reforms. With a case study of informal recycling in Asunción, Paraguay, which compares dumpsite and street recyclers, this article addresses a gap in the literature by focusing on the policies, politics and frameworks that inhibit the implementation of pro-poor reforms. Proposals to include waste pickers misunderstand key dynamics of informal waste work and locate waste-picker cultures as the key barrier to successful waste-picker integration. However, they overlook the historical production of waste-picker organizing styles and underappreciate the diversity between different groups of informal recyclers. They seek to institute cooperatives, a promising model for segments of highly organized recyclers but one which threatens to exclude a large share of waste pickers who opt to work individually. Successfully integrating informal recyclers into waste management requires significant investments in the sector, meaningfully including waste pickers in proposal design and an epistemic shift to prioritize waste-picker needs.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development and Change\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"276-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12819\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市如何才能在升级城市废物基础设施的同时支持贫困人口的生计?尽管发展专家们现在都认为应将非正规回收者纳入城市废物处理系统,但许多城市在实施包容性改革方面却举步维艰。本文通过对巴拉圭亚松森非正规回收的案例研究,对垃圾场和街头回收者进行了比较,重点探讨了阻碍实施扶贫改革的政策、政治和框架,填补了文献中的空白。将拾荒者纳入其中的建议误解了非正规废物处理工作的关键动态,并将拾荒者文化定位为拾荒者成功融入社会的主要障碍。然而,这些建议忽视了拾荒者组织风格的历史形成,低估了不同非正规回收者群体之间的多样性。他们试图建立合作社,这对组织化程度较高的回收者群体来说是一个很有前景的模式,但却有可能将大部分选择个体经营的拾荒者排除在外。要成功地将非正规回收者纳入废物管理,需要对该部门进行大量投资,让拾荒者有意义地参与提案设计,并进行认识上的转变,优先考虑拾荒者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to Inclusive Recycling in Asunción, Paraguay: A Just Transition?

How can cities upgrade urban waste infrastructures while also supporting the livelihoods of the poor? While development experts now agree that informal recyclers should be included in urban waste systems, many cities struggle to implement inclusive reforms. With a case study of informal recycling in Asunción, Paraguay, which compares dumpsite and street recyclers, this article addresses a gap in the literature by focusing on the policies, politics and frameworks that inhibit the implementation of pro-poor reforms. Proposals to include waste pickers misunderstand key dynamics of informal waste work and locate waste-picker cultures as the key barrier to successful waste-picker integration. However, they overlook the historical production of waste-picker organizing styles and underappreciate the diversity between different groups of informal recyclers. They seek to institute cooperatives, a promising model for segments of highly organized recyclers but one which threatens to exclude a large share of waste pickers who opt to work individually. Successfully integrating informal recyclers into waste management requires significant investments in the sector, meaningfully including waste pickers in proposal design and an epistemic shift to prioritize waste-picker needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信