风雨同舟,却不是同一条船:大流行期间亲密关系的变化

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
CJ Eubanks Fleming, Abbey Rose, Kerry Barba, Marli Siciliano
{"title":"风雨同舟,却不是同一条船:大流行期间亲密关系的变化","authors":"CJ Eubanks Fleming,&nbsp;Abbey Rose,&nbsp;Kerry Barba,&nbsp;Marli Siciliano","doi":"10.1111/fare.13034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The current study asked U.S.-based participants to describe how the pandemic had changed their relationship with their intimate partner during the initial lockdown in March–May 2020, and then again in February–March 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has been a major stressor for couples and families.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The study includes 592 partnered individuals drawn from a larger study evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on life at home. Participants were 84.5% women, and 89.8% were White. Responses were coded by a four-person team using a pragmatic coding approach with good reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Codes were grouped together into five categories: stated emotion words, positive changes, negative changes, changes described with mixed emotional descriptors by different participants, and changes in parenting (that did not always have a specific valence). At Time 1, 52% of respondents noted positive changes and 60% of respondents described negative changes. At Time 3, 68% indicated positive changes and 65% indicated negative changes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggest great variability in experiences that couples and families have had over the past few years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This combination of open-ended inquiry and longitudinal study offers a unique perspective on the effects of the pandemic on family life.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 4","pages":"2261-2277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the same storm but not the same boat: Intimate relationship changes across the pandemic\",\"authors\":\"CJ Eubanks Fleming,&nbsp;Abbey Rose,&nbsp;Kerry Barba,&nbsp;Marli Siciliano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fare.13034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The current study asked U.S.-based participants to describe how the pandemic had changed their relationship with their intimate partner during the initial lockdown in March–May 2020, and then again in February–March 2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has been a major stressor for couples and families.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study includes 592 partnered individuals drawn from a larger study evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on life at home. Participants were 84.5% women, and 89.8% were White. Responses were coded by a four-person team using a pragmatic coding approach with good reliability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Codes were grouped together into five categories: stated emotion words, positive changes, negative changes, changes described with mixed emotional descriptors by different participants, and changes in parenting (that did not always have a specific valence). At Time 1, 52% of respondents noted positive changes and 60% of respondents described negative changes. At Time 3, 68% indicated positive changes and 65% indicated negative changes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings suggest great variability in experiences that couples and families have had over the past few years.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>This combination of open-ended inquiry and longitudinal study offers a unique perspective on the effects of the pandemic on family life.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Relations\",\"volume\":\"73 4\",\"pages\":\"2261-2277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13034\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本次研究要求美国的参与者描述在 2020 年 3 月至 5 月的首次封锁期间以及 2021 年 2 月至 3 月的再次封锁期间,大流行如何改变了他们与亲密伴侣的关系。84.5%的参与者为女性,89.8%为白人。回答由一个四人小组进行编码,该小组采用实用编码方法,具有良好的可靠性。编码分为五类:陈述情绪词、积极变化、消极变化、不同参与者用混合情绪描述词描述的变化以及养育子女方面的变化(并不总是具有特定的情感)。在第一阶段,52% 的受访者指出了积极的变化,60% 的受访者描述了消极的变化。研究结果表明,夫妻和家庭在过去几年中的经历存在很大差异。这种开放式调查和纵向研究相结合的方法为了解大流行病对家庭生活的影响提供了一个独特的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the same storm but not the same boat: Intimate relationship changes across the pandemic

Objective

The current study asked U.S.-based participants to describe how the pandemic had changed their relationship with their intimate partner during the initial lockdown in March–May 2020, and then again in February–March 2021.

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a major stressor for couples and families.

Method

The study includes 592 partnered individuals drawn from a larger study evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on life at home. Participants were 84.5% women, and 89.8% were White. Responses were coded by a four-person team using a pragmatic coding approach with good reliability.

Results

Codes were grouped together into five categories: stated emotion words, positive changes, negative changes, changes described with mixed emotional descriptors by different participants, and changes in parenting (that did not always have a specific valence). At Time 1, 52% of respondents noted positive changes and 60% of respondents described negative changes. At Time 3, 68% indicated positive changes and 65% indicated negative changes.

Conclusion

Findings suggest great variability in experiences that couples and families have had over the past few years.

Implications

This combination of open-ended inquiry and longitudinal study offers a unique perspective on the effects of the pandemic on family life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信